Novel active personal nanoparticle sampler for the exposure assessment of nanoparticles in workplaces.

A novel active personal nanoparticle sampler (PENS), which enables the collection of both respirable particulate mass (RPM) and nanoparticles (NPs) simultaneously, was developed to meet the critical demand for personal sampling of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) in workplaces. The PENS consists of a respirable cyclone and a micro-orifice impactor with the cutoff aerodynamic diameter (d(pa50)) of 4 μm and 100 nm, respectively. The micro-orifice impactor has a fixed micro-orifice plate (137 nozzles of 55 μm in the inner diameter) and a rotating, silicone oil-coated Teflon filter substrate at 1 rpm to achieve a uniform particle deposition and avoid solid particle bounce. A final filter is used after the impactor to collect the NPs. Calibration results show that the d(pa50) of the respirable cyclone and the micro-orifice impactor are 3.92 ± 0.22 μm and 101.4 ± 0.1 nm, respectively. The d(pa50) at the loaded micro-Al(2)O(3) mass of 0.36-3.18 mg is shifted to 102.9-101.2 nm, respectively, while it is shifted to 98.9-97.8 nm at the loaded nano-TiO(2) mass of 0.92-1.78 mg, respectively. That is, the shift of d(pa50) due to solid particle loading is small if the PENS is not overloaded. Both NPs and RPM concentrations were found to agree well with those of the IOSH respirable cyclone and MOUDI. By using the present PENS, the collected samples can be further analyzed for chemical species concentrations besides gravimetric analysis to determine the actual exposure concentrations of ENMs in both RPM and NPs fractions in workplaces, which are often influenced by the background or incident pollution sources.

[1]  Yoshio Otani,et al.  Development of a Personal Sampler for Evaluating Exposure to Ultrafine Particles , 2010 .

[2]  J. J. Collins,et al.  Design and evaluation of a new low-pressure impactor. 2 , 1979 .

[3]  T Renée Anthony,et al.  A personal nanoparticle respiratory deposition (NRD) sampler. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Richard C. Flagan,et al.  Design and evaluation of new low-pressure impactor. I , 1978 .

[5]  Heinz Burtscher,et al.  A Thermophoretic Precipitator for the Representative Collection of Atmospheric Ultrafine Particles for Microscopic Analysis , 2007 .

[6]  D. Pui,et al.  Laboratory and Field Tests of a Novel Three-Stage Personal Dust Sampler for Sampling Three Dust Fractions Simultaneously , 2008 .

[7]  V A Marple,et al.  A personal cascade impactor: design, evaluation and calibration. , 1987, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[8]  Jorma Keskinen,et al.  Electrical low pressure impactor , 1992 .

[9]  Peng-Chi Tsai,et al.  Dustiness test of nanopowders using a standard rotating drum with a modified sampling train , 2009 .

[10]  Benjamin Y. H. Liu,et al.  Characteristics of laminar jet impactors , 1974 .

[11]  Chuen-Jinn Tsai,et al.  Field Study of the Accuracy of Two Respirable Sampling Cyclones , 1999 .

[12]  Carl Sunderman,et al.  A Handheld Electrostatic Precipitator for Sampling Airborne Particles and Nanoparticles , 2010 .

[13]  Kenneth L. Rubow,et al.  A Microorifice Uniform Deposit Impactor (MOUDI): Description, Calibration, and Use , 1991 .

[14]  Jay R. Turner,et al.  Greased and oiled substrates as bounce-free impaction surfaces , 1987 .

[15]  Anthony J. Marchese,et al.  A Personal, Thermophoretic Sampler for Airborne Nanoparticles , 2011 .

[16]  Chuen-Jinn Tsai,et al.  SOLID PARTICLE COLLECTION CHARACTERISTICS ON IMPACTION SURFACES OF DIFFERENT DESIGNS , 1995 .

[17]  T. Shih,et al.  Characteristics of lead aerosols in different work environments. , 1997, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[18]  David Y. H. Pui,et al.  Editorial: Recent advances and new challenges of occupational and environmental health of nanotechnology , 2009 .

[19]  Michael J. Ellenbecker,et al.  Exposure assessment of nano-sized and respirable particles at different workplaces , 2011 .

[20]  Chuen-Jinn Tsai,et al.  Solid particle collection characteristics on impaction surfaces of different designs , 1996 .

[21]  Laura Hodson,et al.  Approaches to safe nanotechnology; managing the health and safety concerns associated with engineered nanomaterials , 2009 .

[22]  Benjamin Y. H. Liu,et al.  Effect of Coating Thickness on Particle Bounce in Inertial Impactors , 1992 .

[23]  M Lippmann,et al.  Performance characteristics of the multicyclone aerosol sampler. , 1974, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[24]  K. Willeke,et al.  IMPACTOR DESIGN , 2002 .

[25]  M. L. Laucks.  Aerosol Technology Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles , 2000 .

[26]  Tung-Sheng Shih,et al.  Effect of deposited particles and particle charge on the penetration of small sampling cyclones , 1999 .

[27]  Christof Asbach,et al.  Optimisation of a thermophoretic personal sampler for nanoparticle exposure studies , 2009 .

[28]  Chuen-Jinn Tsai,et al.  Use of porous foam as the substrate of an impactor for respirable aerosol sampling , 2005 .

[29]  Paul Schulte,et al.  Occupational Risk Management of Engineered Nanoparticles , 2008, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.