On the Angular Resolution Limit for Array Processing in the Presence of Modeling Errors

In this correspondence, we study the impact of modeling errors on the angular resolution limit (ARL) for two closely spaced sources in the context of array processing. Particularly, we follow two methods based on the well-known Lee and Smith's criteria using the Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRB) to derive closed-form expressions of the ARL with respect to (w.r.t.) the error variance. We show that, as the signal-to-noise ratio increases, the ARL does not fall into zero (contrary to the classical case without modeling errors) and converge to a fixed limit depending on the method for which we give a closed-form expression. One can see that at high SNR, the ARL in the Lee and Smith sense are linear as a function of the error variance. We also investigate the influence of the array geometry on the ARL based on the Lee's and Smith's criteria.

[1]  Anne Ferréol,et al.  Statistical Analysis of the MUSIC Algorithm in the Presence of Modeling Errors, Taking Into Account the Resolution Probability , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[2]  S. T. Smith Statistical resolution limits and the complexified Crame/spl acute/r-Rao bound , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[3]  Harry B. Lee,et al.  The Cramer-Rao bound on frequency estimates of signals closely spaced in frequency , 1992, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[4]  Anthony J. Weiss,et al.  Fundamental Limitations on the Resolution of Deterministic Signals , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[5]  Mohammed Nabil El Korso,et al.  Statistical Resolution Limit of the Uniform Linear Cocentered Orthogonal Loop and Dipole Array , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[6]  Zhi Liu,et al.  Statistical Angular Resolution Limit for Point Sources , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[7]  Anthony J. Weiss,et al.  Array shape calibration using sources in unknown locations-a maximum likelihood approach , 1989, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[8]  H. B. Lee,et al.  The Cramer-Rao bound on frequency estimates of signals closely spaced in frequency (unconditional case) , 1994, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[9]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[10]  H. Chernoff LARGE-SAMPLE THEORY: PARAMETRIC CASE' , 1956 .

[11]  Mohammed Nabil El Korso,et al.  Statistical resolution limit for the multidimensional harmonic retrieval model: hypothesis test and Cramér-Rao Bound approaches , 2011, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[12]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  On the resolvability of sinusoids with nearby frequencies in the presence of noise , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[13]  A. Lee Swindlehurst,et al.  Analysis of the combined effects of finite samples and model errors on array processing performance , 1994, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[14]  S. Kay Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory , 1993 .

[15]  Peter M. Schultheiss,et al.  Array shape calibration using sources in unknown locations-Part I: Far-field sources , 1987, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[16]  Erdogan Dilaveroglu,et al.  Nonmatrix Cramer-Rao bound expressions for high-resolution frequency estimators , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[17]  B. C. Ng,et al.  Sensor-array calibration using a maximum-likelihood approach , 1996 .

[18]  S.T. Smith Statistical Resolution Limits and the Complexified , 2005 .

[19]  Rémy Boyer,et al.  Performance Bounds and Angular Resolution Limit for the Moving Colocated MIMO Radar , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.