Using stochastic risk assessment in setting information priorities for managing dioxin impact from a municipal waste incinerator.

The objectives of this study were to assess site-specific carcinogenic risk of incinerator-emitted dioxins in a manner reflecting pollutant transfer across multimedia and multi-pathways. The study used site-specific environmental and exposure information and combined the Monte Carlo method with multimedia modeling to produce probability distributions of risk estimates. The risk estimates were further categorized by contaminated environmental media and exposure pathways that are experienced by human receptors in order to pinpoint significant sources of risk. Rank correlation coefficients were also calculated along with the Monte Carlo sampling to identify key factors that influenced estimation of risk. The results showed that ingestion accounted for more than 90% of the total risk and that risk control on ingestion of eggs, aboveground vegetables, and poultry should receive priority. It was also found that variation of parameters with variability accounted for around 35% of the total risk variance, while uncertainty contributed to the remaining 65%. Intake rates of aboveground vegetables, eggs, and poultry were the key parameters with the largest contribution to variance. In addition, sufficient sampling and analysis of dioxin contents in eggs, aboveground vegetables, poultry, soil, and fruit should be performed to improve risk estimation because the variation in concentrations in these media accounted for the largest overall risk variance. Finally, focus should be placed on reduction of uncertainty associated with the risk estimation through ingestion of aboveground vegetables, eggs, poultry, fruit, and soil because the risk estimates associated with these exposure pathways had the largest variance.

[1]  L. Tuxen,et al.  Integrated risk information system (IRIS) , 1990 .

[2]  L Fradkin,et al.  Comparative analysis of health risk assessments for municipal waste combustors. , 1991, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[3]  D. Crawford‐Brown,et al.  Risk-Based Environmental Decisions , 1999 .

[4]  James L. Repace,et al.  Air Nicotine and Saliva Cotinine as Indicators of Workplace Passive Smoking Exposure and Risk 1 , 1998, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  D. L. Strenge,et al.  Multimedia Environmental Pollutant Assessment System (MEPAS{reg_sign}): Exposure pathway and human health impact assessment models , 1995 .

[6]  J. C. Helton,et al.  An Investigation of Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Techniques for Computer Models , 1988 .

[7]  A. Scialli,et al.  Risk assessment methods: Approaches for assessing health and environmental risks , 1995 .

[8]  W B Mills,et al.  Sensitivity of Concentration and Risk Predictions in the PRESTO and MMSOILS Multimedia Models: Regression Technique Assessment , 1999, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[9]  T E McKone,et al.  Estimating human exposure through multiple pathways from air, water, and soil. , 1991, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[10]  Ann Y. Watson,et al.  Evaluating the health impacts of incinerator emissions , 1996 .

[11]  Kay H. Jones,et al.  Toxic trace pollutants from incineration , 1991 .

[12]  Jones,et al.  Improvements to the UK PCDD/F and PCB atmospheric emission inventory following an emissions measurement programme , 1999, Chemosphere.

[13]  Hwong-Wen Ma The incorporation of stochasticity in risk analysis and management: a case study , 2000 .

[14]  C. R. Dempsey,et al.  Incineration of Hazardous Waste: A Critical Review Update , 1993 .

[15]  T. E. McKone,et al.  CalTOX, a multimedia total exposure model for hazardous-waste sites; Part 1, Executive summary , 1993 .