Control strategies for the transition from multijoint to single-joint arm movements studied using a simple mechanical constraint.

Changes were studied in neuromotor control that were evoked by constraining the motion of the elbow joint during planar, supported movements of the dominant arm in eight normal human subjects. Electromyograph (EMG) recordings from shoulder and arm muscles were used to determine whether the normal multijoint muscle activity patterns associated with reaching to a visual target were modified when the movement was reduced to a single-joint task, by pinning the elbow to a particular location in the planar work space. Three blocks of 150 movements each were used in the experiments. Subjects were presented with the unconstrained task in the first and third blocks with an intervening block of constrained trials. Kinematic, dynamic, and EMG measures of performance were compared across blocks. The imposition of the pin constraint caused predictable changes in kinematic performance, in that near-linear motions of the hand became curved. This was followed by changes in limb dynamic performance at the elbow. However, changes in EMG activity at the shoulder lagged the kinematic changes substantially (by about 15 trials). The gradual character of the changes in EMG timing does not support a primary role for segmental reflex action in mediating the transition between multijoint and single-joint control strategies. Furthermore, the scope and magnitude of these changes argues against the notion that human motor performance is driven by the optimization of muscle- or joint-related criteria alone. The findings are best described as reflecting the actions of a feedforward adaptive controller that has properties that are modified progressively according to the environmental state.

[1]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN - The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd Edition , 1987 .

[2]  J. Flanagan,et al.  The Origin of Electromyograms - Explanations Based on the Equilibrium Point Hypothesis , 1990 .

[3]  J. McIntyre,et al.  Servo Hypotheses for the Biological Control of Movement. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[4]  Claude Ghez,et al.  Roles of Proprioceptive Input in Control of Reaching Movements , 1992 .

[5]  M L Audu,et al.  The influence of muscle model complexity in musculoskeletal motion modeling. , 1985, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[6]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  Coordinating movement at two joints: a principle of linear covariance. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  John E. Gibson,et al.  Nonlinear Automatic Control , 1963 .

[8]  A G Feldman,et al.  One-trial adaptation of movement to changes in load. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  P. N. Kugler,et al.  Search Strategies and the Acquisition of Coordination , 1989 .

[10]  R. Stein,et al.  Nonlinear behavior of muscle reflexes at the human ankle joint. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  M. Argenta,et al.  Two joint ballistic arm movements in patients with Parkinson's disease , 1985 .

[12]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Time series analysis of motor learning: KR versus No-KR , 1986 .

[13]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Effect of load perturbations on EMG activity and trajectories of pointing movements , 1988, Brain Research.

[14]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Engineering Statistics , 2004, Technometrics.

[15]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[16]  C Ghez,et al.  Roles of proprioceptive input in the programming of arm trajectories. , 1990, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[17]  J C Houk,et al.  Control strategies in physiological systems , 1988, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[18]  W. Rymer,et al.  Robotic devices for physical rehabilitation of stroke patients: fundamental requirements, target therapeutic techniques, and preliminary designs , 1996 .

[19]  P J Cordo,et al.  Kinesthetic control of a multijoint movement sequence. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  C. Ghez,et al.  Loss of proprioception produces deficits in interjoint coordination. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  C. D. MARSDEN,et al.  Servo Action in Human Voluntary Movement , 1972, Nature.

[22]  N. Hogan An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[23]  J R Flanagan,et al.  The Role of Internal Models in Motion Planning and Control: Evidence from Grip Force Adjustments during Movements of Hand-Held Loads , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  M. Kawato Optimization and learning in neural networks for formation and control of coordinated movement , 1993 .

[25]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[26]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C. The art of scientific computing , 1987 .

[27]  R B Stein,et al.  Estimating mechanical parameters of leg segments in individuals with and without physical disabilities. , 1996, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[28]  R L Sainburg,et al.  Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  T. Brashers-Krug,et al.  Functional Stages in the Formation of Human Long-Term Motor Memory , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  D A Hong,et al.  Task dependent patterns of muscle activation at the shoulder and elbow for unconstrained arm movements. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  J. Cooke The role of stretch reflexes during active movements , 1980, Brain Research.