Self-collection of samples as an additional approach to deliver testing services for sexually transmitted infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Self-collection of samples for diagnostic testing offers the advantages of patient autonomy, confidentiality and convenience. Despite data showing their feasibility and accuracy, there is a need to better understand how to implement such interventions for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). To support WHO guidelines on self-care interventions, we conducted a systematic review to investigate whether self-collection of samples should be made available as an additional approach to deliver STI testing services. Methods Peer-reviewed studies were included if they compared individuals who self-collected samples for chlamydia, gonorrhoea, syphilis and/or trichomonas testing to individuals who had samples collected by clinicians on the following outcomes: uptake/frequency of STI testing, social harms/adverse events, positive yield (case finding), linkage to clinical assessment/treatment and reported sexual risk behaviour. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS and EMBASE for articles published through July 2018. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and the Evidence Project tool for non-RCTs. Meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models to generate pooled estimates of relative risk (RR). Results Eleven studies, including five RCTs and six observational studies with a total of 202 745 participants, met inclusion criteria. Studies were conducted in Australia, Denmark and the USA. Meta-analysis found that programmes offering self-collection of samples increased overall uptake of STI testing services (RR: 2.941, 95% CI 1.188 to 7.281) and case finding (RR: 2.166, 95% CI 1.043 to 4.498). No studies reported measuring STI testing frequency, social harms/adverse events, linkage to care or sexual risk behaviour. Discussion While greater diversity in study designs, outcomes and settings would strengthen the evidence base, findings from this review suggest that self-collection of STI samples could be an effective additional strategy to increase STI testing uptake. Prospero registration number PROSPERO CRD42018114866.

[1]  J. Denison,et al.  The Evidence Project risk of bias tool: assessing study rigor for both randomized and non-randomized intervention studies , 2019, Systematic Reviews.

[2]  M. Dybul,et al.  Advancing global health and strengthening the HIV response in the era of the Sustainable Development Goals: the International AIDS Society—Lancet Commission , 2018, The Lancet.

[3]  N. Garrett,et al.  Beyond syndromic management: Opportunities for diagnosis-based treatment of sexually transmitted infections in low- and middle-income countries , 2018, PloS one.

[4]  Hongyun Fu,et al.  Expanding syphilis testing: a scoping review of syphilis testing interventions among key populations , 2018, Expert review of anti-infective therapy.

[5]  S. Kulasingam,et al.  Optimizing Screening for Sexually Transmitted Infections in Men Using Self-Collected Swabs: A Systematic Review , 2017, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[6]  R. Peeling,et al.  Advancing point of care diagnostics for the control and prevention of STIs: the way forward , 2017, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[7]  R. Peeling,et al.  Performance and operational characteristics of point-of-care tests for the diagnosis of urogenital gonococcal infections , 2017, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[8]  R. Peeling,et al.  Point-of-care tests for STIs: the way forward , 2017, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[9]  R. Peeling,et al.  Systematic reviews of point-of-care tests for the diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections , 2017, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[10]  K. Brookmeyer,et al.  THE REALWORLD OF STD PREVENTION Creating Innovative Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing Options for University Students : The Impact of an STI Self-testing Program , 2018 .

[11]  R. Peeling,et al.  Role of dual HIV/syphilis test kits in expanding syphilis screening , 2017, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[12]  R. Peeling,et al.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating the performance and operational characteristics of dual point-of-care tests for HIV and syphilis , 2017, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[13]  R. Peeling,et al.  Rapid and point-of-care tests for the diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis in women and men , 2017, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[14]  R. Peeling,et al.  Point-of-Care Sexually Transmitted Infection Diagnostics: Proceedings of the STAR Sexually Transmitted Infection—Clinical Trial Group Programmatic Meeting , 2017, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[15]  H. Mohammed,et al.  Self-sampling and self-testing for STIs and HIV: the case for consistent nomenclature , 2016, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[16]  C. Abraham,et al.  Brief interventions to prevent sexually transmitted infections suitable for in-service use: A systematic review. , 2016, Preventive medicine.

[17]  J. Marrazzo,et al.  Implementation and Operational Research: Effectiveness and Patient Acceptability of a Sexually Transmitted Infection Self-Testing Program in an HIV Care Setting , 2016, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[18]  N. McGrath,et al.  Advancing STI care in low/middle-income countries: has STI syndromic management reached its use-by date? , 2016, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[19]  K. Bernstein,et al.  Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Disease Screening Outside the Clinic—Implications for the Modern Sexually Transmitted Disease Program , 2016, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[20]  Marleen Temmerman,et al.  Global Estimates of the Prevalence and Incidence of Four Curable Sexually Transmitted Infections in 2012 Based on Systematic Review and Global Reporting , 2015, PloS one.

[21]  N. Low,et al.  Home-based versus clinic-based specimen collection in the management of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections. , 2015, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[22]  L. Hoang,et al.  Self-Collected versus Clinician-Collected Sampling for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Screening: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2015, PloS one.

[23]  P. Paudyal,et al.  Obtaining Self-Samples to Diagnose Curable Sexually Transmitted Infections: A Systematic Review of Patients’ Experiences , 2015, PloS one.

[24]  S. Lensing,et al.  Could Home Sexually Transmitted Infection Specimen Collection With e-Prescription Be a Cost-Effective Strategy for Clinical Trials and Clinical Care? , 2015, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[25]  W. Geisler.  Diagnosis and Management of Uncomplicated Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Adolescents and Adults: Summary of Evidence Reviewed for the 2015 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines. , 2011, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[26]  Yvonne L. Potter.  Self-screening for sexually transmitted infections. , 2014, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[27]  S. P. Wasti,et al.  Comparative effectiveness and acceptability of home-based and clinic-based sampling methods for sexually transmissible infections screening in females aged 14-50 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2013, Sexual health.

[28]  Fiona Stewart,et al.  The Cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias , 2013 .

[29]  J. Kaldor,et al.  Home-based chlamydia and gonorrhoea screening: a systematic review of strategies and outcomes , 2013, BMC Public Health.

[30]  Rosanna W. Peeling,et al.  Point-of-care testing for sexually transmitted infections: recent advances and implications for disease control , 2013, Current opinion in infectious diseases.

[31]  R. Guy,et al.  New Xpress Sexually Transmissible Infection Screening Clinic Improves Patient Journey and Clinic Capacity at a Large Sexual Health Clinic , 2013, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[32]  C. Gaydos,et al.  Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Chlamydia trachomatis Screening Via Internet-based Self-collected Swabs Compared With Clinic-based Sample Collection , 2011, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[33]  J. Papp,et al.  Use of Home-Obtained Vaginal Swabs to Facilitate Rescreening for Chlamydia trachomatis Infections: Two Randomized Controlled Trials , 2011, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[34]  J. Peipert,et al.  Screening for sexually transmitted infections at home or in the clinic? , 2011, Current opinion in infectious diseases.

[35]  C. Gaydos,et al.  Chlamydia trachomatis Age-Specific Prevalence in Women Who Used an Internet-Based Self-screening Program Compared to Women Who Were Screened in Family Planning Clinics , 2011, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[36]  J. Peipert,et al.  Home versus clinic-based specimen collection for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae , 2011, Expert review of anti-infective therapy.

[37]  D. Scholes,et al.  Acceptability of Urine-Based Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in Asymptomatic Young Men: A Systematic Review , 2008, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[38]  R. Ness,et al.  Home screening for sexually transmitted diseases in high-risk young women: randomised controlled trial , 2007, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[39]  E. Lackritz,et al.  Sexually transmitted infections in developing countries: Current concepts and strategies on improving STI prevention treatment and control. , 2007 .

[40]  Rhian Parker,et al.  Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature , 2006, BMC public health.

[41]  S. Garland,et al.  Screening injecting drug users for sexually transmitted infections and blood borne viruses using street outreach and self collected sampling , 2005, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[42]  S. Garland,et al.  Diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections (STI) using self-collected non-invasive specimens. , 2004, Sexual health.

[43]  W. Miller,et al.  Testing for Chlamydial and Gonorrheal Infections Outside of Clinic Settings: A Summary of the Literature , 2004, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[44]  L. Markowitz,et al.  Developments in the screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review. , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America.

[45]  F. Olesen,et al.  Managing partners of people diagnosed with Chlamydia trachomatis: a comparison of two partner testing methods , 2003, Sexually transmitted infections.

[46]  Margaret-Mary G. Wilson,et al.  Sexually transmitted diseases. , 2003, Clinics in geriatric medicine.

[47]  P. Murray,et al.  Self-collected vaginal swabs for the detection of multiple sexually transmitted infections in adolescent girls. , 2002, Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology.

[48]  F. Olesen,et al.  Efficacy of home sampling for screening of Chlamydia trachomatis: randomised study , 1998, BMJ.

[49]  F. Olesen,et al.  Home sampling versus conventional contact tracing for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male partners of infected women: randomised study , 1998, BMJ.