Performance and Seismic Design of Underground Structures

Underground structures, tunnels, subways, metro stations and parking lots, are crucial components of the build environment and transportation networks. Considering their importance for life save and economy, appropriate seismic design is of prior significance. Their seismic performance during past earthquakes is generally better than aboveground structures. However several cases of severe damage to total collapse have been reported in the literature, with that of the Daikai metro station in Kobe during the Hyogoken-Nambu earthquake (1995) being one of the most characteristic. These recent damages revealed some important weaknesses in the current seismic design practices. The aim of this chapter is not to make another general presentation of the methods used for the seismic design of underground structures, but rather to discuss and highlight the most important needs for an improved seismic performance and design. In that respect it is important to consider that the specific geometric and conceptual features of underground structures make their seismic behavior and performance very distinct from the behavior of aboveground structures, as they are subjected to strong seismic ground deformations and distortions, rather than inertial loads. Several methods are available, from simplified analytical elastic solutions, to sophisticated and in principal more accurate, full dynamic numerical models. Most of them have noticeable weaknesses on the description of the physical phenomenon, the design assumptions and principles and the evaluation of the parameters they need. The chapter presents a short but comprehensive review of the available design methods, denoting the crucial issues and the problems that an engineer could face during the seismic analysis. The main issues discussed herein cover the following topics: (i) force based design against displacement based design, (ii) deformation modes of rectangular underground structures under seismic excitation, (iii) seismic earth pressures on underground structures, (iv) seismic shear stresses distribution on the perimeter of the structure, (v) appropriateness of the presently used impedance functions to model the inertial and the kinematic soil-structure interaction effects, (vi) design seismic input motion, accounting of the incoherence effects and the spatial variation of the motion and (vii) effect of the build environment (i.e. city-effects) on the seismic response of underground structures. The discussion is based on detailed numerical analysis of specific cases and recent experimental results in centrifuge tests. Other important issues like the design of submerged tunnels to liquefaction risk, or the complexity to evaluate the response of the joints of submerged tunnels are also shortly addressed. Finally we present the most recent developments on the evaluation of adequate fragility curves for shallow tunnels.

[1]  G N Owen,et al.  Earthquake engineering of large underground structures , 1981 .

[2]  Francesco Silvestri,et al.  Seismic analyses of shallow tunnels by dynamic centrifuge tests and finite elements , 2009 .

[3]  Daniela Boldini,et al.  Numerical modelling of the transverse dynamic behaviour of circular tunnels in clayey soils , 2009 .

[4]  Ioannis Anastasopoulos,et al.  Response of three Athens metro underground structures in the 1999 Parnitha earthquake , 2005 .

[5]  George Gazetas,et al.  Footings under seismic loading: Analysis and design issues with emphasis on bridge foundations , 2006 .

[6]  Kyriazis Pitilakis,et al.  Numerical simulation of round robin numerical test on tunnels using a simplified kinematic hardening model , 2014 .

[7]  Song Yuan,et al.  Investigation and assessment on mountain tunnels and geotechnical damage after the Wenchuan earthquake , 2009 .

[8]  Ricardo Dobry,et al.  Horizontal Response of Piles in Layered Soils , 1984 .

[9]  S. Kramer Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering , 1996 .

[10]  Ioannis Anastasopoulos,et al.  Analysis of cut-and-cover tunnels against large tectonic deformation , 2010 .

[11]  Antonio Bobet,et al.  EFFECT OF PORE WATER PRESSURE ON TUNNEL SUPPORT DURING STATIC AND SEISMIC LOADING , 2003 .

[12]  Asce,et al.  Guidelines for the Seismic Design of Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems , 1984 .

[13]  Bruce L. Kutter,et al.  Centrifuge Testing of the Seismic Performance of a Submerged Cut-and-Cover Tunnel in Liquefiable Soil , 2008 .

[14]  S. P. Gopal Madabhushi,et al.  A model study on the effects of input motion on the seismic behaviour of tunnels , 2011 .

[15]  T. R. Kuesel EARTHQUAKE DESIGN CRITERIA FOR SUBWAYS , 1969 .

[16]  Sotiris Argyroudis,et al.  Seismic fragility curves of shallow tunnels in alluvial deposits , 2012 .

[17]  S. Samata,et al.  A study of the damage of subway structures during the 1995 Hanshin-Awaji earthquake , 1997 .

[18]  Marius Ghergu,et al.  Structure-soil-structure coupling in seismic excitation and city effect , 2009 .

[19]  Spg Madabhushi,et al.  Dynamic centrifuge tests on shallow tunnel models in dry sand , 2010 .

[20]  George Gazetas,et al.  Winkler model for lateral response of rigid caisson foundations in linear soil , 2006 .

[21]  Youssef M A Hashash,et al.  Ovaling deformations of circular tunnels under seismic loading, an update on seismic design and analysis of underground structures , 2005 .

[22]  Rp Kennedy,et al.  Fault Movement Effects on Buried Oil Pipeline , 1977 .

[23]  R. Kastner,et al.  Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground , 2002 .

[24]  I. M. Idriss,et al.  SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE FOR EVALUATING SOIL LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL , 1971 .

[25]  G. Gazetas,et al.  Behaviour of deep immersed tunnel under combined normal fault rupture deformation and subsequent seismic shaking , 2008 .

[26]  Youssef M A Hashash,et al.  Contact interface in seismic analysis of circular tunnels , 2009 .

[27]  Wang Jing-Ming,et al.  The Distribution of Earthquake Damage to Underground Facilities during the 1976 Tang-Shan Earthquake , 1985 .

[28]  Kyriazis Pitilakis,et al.  Seismic performance of circular tunnels: centrifuge testing versus numerical analysis , 2012 .

[29]  Charles H. Dowding,et al.  Damage to Rock Tunnels from Earthquake Shaking , 1978 .

[30]  Kyriazis Pitilakis,et al.  Physical Modeling for the Evaluation of the Seismic Behavior of Square Tunnels , 2014 .

[31]  Joseph Penzien,et al.  Stresses in linings of bored tunnels , 1998 .

[32]  Antonio Bobet,et al.  Analytical solution for deep rectangular structures subjected to far-field shear stresses , 2006 .

[33]  Kyung-Ho Park,et al.  Analytical solution for seismic-induced ovaling of circular tunnel lining under no-slip interface conditions : A revisit , 2009 .

[34]  William Barclay,et al.  Seismic Design of Tunnels A Simple State-of-the-Art Design Approach , 1993 .

[35]  Mjn Priestley,et al.  Myths and Fallacies in Earthquake Engineering--Conflicts Between Design and Reality , 1995, SP-157: Recent Developments In Lateral Force Transfer In Buildings.

[36]  Kazuhiko Kawashima,et al.  Seismic Design of Underground Structures in Soft Ground--A Review , 1999 .

[37]  Ricardo Dobry,et al.  Spring and Dashpot Coefficients for Machine Foundations on Piles , 1982 .

[38]  Joseph Penzien,et al.  Seismically induced racking of tunnel linings , 2000 .

[39]  Ioannis Anastasopoulos,et al.  Nonlinear Response of Deep Immersed Tunnel to Strong Seismic Shaking , 2007 .

[40]  Jui-Ching Chou,et al.  Centrifuge Modeling of Seismically Induced Uplift for the BART Transbay Tube , 2011 .

[41]  K Hoeg STRESSES AGAINST UNDERGROUND STRUCTURAL CYLINDERS , 1968 .

[42]  Sunil Sharma,et al.  Underground opening damage from earthquakes , 1991 .

[43]  土木学会耐震工学委員会 The 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake : investigation into damage to Civil Engineering Structures , 1996 .

[44]  O. Kiyomiya EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT DESIGN FEATURES OF IMMERSED TUNNELS IN JAPAN , 1995 .

[45]  G. Gazetas FORMULAS AND CHARTS FOR IMPEDANCES OF SURFACE AND EMBEDDED FOUNDATIONS , 1991 .

[46]  Anestis S. Veletsos,et al.  Dynamic soil pressures on rigid vertical walls , 1994 .

[47]  S. P. Gopal Madabhushi,et al.  EFFECT OF DEPTH ON THE SEISMIC RESPONSE OF SQUARE TUNNELS , 2011 .

[48]  Mourad Zeghal,et al.  Analysis of Site Liquefaction Using Earthquake Records , 1994 .

[49]  A. Ang,et al.  Lifeline response to spatially variable ground motions , 1988 .

[50]  A. Zerva,et al.  Spatial variation of seismic ground motions: An overview , 2002 .

[51]  S. P. Gopal Madabhushi,et al.  Effect of depth on seismic response of circular tunnels , 2011 .

[52]  N. Newmark Problems in Wave Propagation in Soil and Rock , 1975 .

[53]  Kyriazis Pitilakis,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigation of the seismic behavior of rectangular tunnels in soft soils , 2014 .

[54]  Aspasia Zerva,et al.  On the spatial variation of seismic ground motions and its effects on lifelines , 1994 .

[55]  James R. Gingery A SIMPLIFIED METHOD FOR ESTIMATING SHEAR STRAINS FOR OVALING AND RACKING ANALYSIS OF TUNNELS , 2007 .

[56]  W. L. Wang,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGE IN MOUNTAIN TUNNELS DUE TO THE TAIWAN CHI-CHI EARTHQUAKE , 2001 .

[57]  James L. Beck,et al.  Identification of parametric ground motion random fields from spatially recorded seismic data , 2003 .

[58]  Birger Schmidt,et al.  SEISMIC DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES , 2001 .

[59]  R. Clough,et al.  Dynamics Of Structures , 1975 .

[60]  C. M. St John,et al.  Aseismic design of underground structures , 1987 .

[61]  Hiroshi Yoshimura,et al.  Centrifuge model tests on the dynamic response of sewer trunk culverts , 2010 .

[62]  Antonio Bobet,et al.  Load Transfer Mechanisms between Underground Structure and Surrounding Ground: Evaluation of the Failure of the Daikai Station , 2005 .

[63]  Xiaojun Shi,et al.  Shaking table test of utility tunnel under non-uniform earthquake wave excitation , 2010 .

[64]  George Gazetas,et al.  Kinematic seismic response and bending of free-head piles in layered soil , 1993 .

[65]  A. Zerva Pipeline response to directionally and spatially correlated seismic ground motions , 1993 .

[66]  P. B. Schnabel SHAKE-A Computer Program for Earthquake Response Analysis of Horizontally Layered Sites , 1970 .

[67]  D. Wells,et al.  New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[68]  Jean-François Semblat,et al.  Seismic-Wave Propagation in Alluvial Basins and Influence of Site-City Interaction , 2008 .

[69]  Lidija Zdravković,et al.  Case study on seismic tunnel response , 2008 .

[70]  Francesco Silvestri,et al.  Centrifuge Modeling of Seismic Loading on Tunnels in Sand , 2012 .

[71]  Koichi Maekawa,et al.  THE COLLAPSE MECHANISM OF A SUBWAY STATION DURING THE GREAT HANSHIN EARTHQUAKE , 1997 .

[72]  N. Yoshida,et al.  Damage to Daikai Subway Station , 1996 .