Processing the spatial configuration of complex actions involves right posterior parietal cortex: An fMRI study with clinical implications

The left hemispheric dominance for complex motor behavior is undisputed. Clinical observations of complex motor deficits in patients with right hemispheric lesions, however, suggest an additional contribution of the right hemisphere to higher motor control. We assessed, using functional MRI (fMRI), which brain regions are implicated in processing the spatial aspects of complex, object‐related actions. Using a blocked, factorial design, 17 healthy volunteers were asked to detect either spatial or sequential errors (factor ERROR) in complex activities of daily living, presented as video sequences with the appropriate object(s) or as pantomimes (factor STIMULUS). Observing complex actions (irrespective of stimulus type) activated a bilateral frontoparietal network. Observing actions with objects (relative to pantomimes) differentially increased neural activity in the fusiform gyrus and inferior occipital cortex bilaterally. Observing pantomimes, i.e., the same actions but without any object, differentially activated right prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, the precuneus, and left cerebellum. The left cingulate cortex was differentially activated when subjects assessed the sequencing of actions. By contrast, assessing the spatial configuration of complex actions differentially increased neural activity in right posterior parietal cortex. A significant interaction of ERROR and STIMULUS was revealed for the right inferior parietal cortex only. These findings suggest a specific role of the right hemisphere, especially of right posterior parietal cortex, in processing spatial aspects of complex actions and thus provide a physiological basis for the observed apraxic motor deficits in patients with right hemispheric damage. Hum Brain Mapp, 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Vittorio Gallese,et al.  Listening to Action-related Sentences Activates Fronto-parietal Motor Circuits , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  G. Goldenberg Defective imitation of gestures in patients with damage in the left or right hemispheres. , 1996, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[3]  C D Frith,et al.  Space-based and object-based visual attention: shared and specific neural domains. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  P. Strick,et al.  Imaging the premotor areas , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[5]  K. Zilles,et al.  Line bisection judgments implicate right parietal cortex and cerebellum as assessed by fMRI , 2000, Neurology.

[6]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex , 1999, Nature.

[7]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  Left inferior parietal cortex integrates time and space during collision judgments , 2003, NeuroImage.

[8]  H. Liepmann,et al.  Die linke Hemisphäre und das Handeln.1) , 1908 .

[9]  G. Fink,et al.  Rumlicher Neglect@@@Spatial neglect , 2004 .

[10]  D. Kimura,et al.  Sex differences in cerebral organization for speech and praxic functions. , 1983, Canadian journal of psychology.

[11]  K. Haaland,et al.  The different types of limb apraxia errors made by patients with left vs. right hemisphere damage , 1984, Brain and Cognition.

[12]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. , 1999, Science.

[13]  A Bartolo,et al.  Pantomimes are special gestures which rely on working memory , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[14]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[15]  P. H. Weiss,et al.  Motor impairment in patients with parietal lesions: disturbances of meaningless arm movement sequences , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  An MRI-Based Probabilistic Atlas of Neuroanatomy , 1994 .

[17]  J. Marshall,et al.  The neural consequences of conflict between intention and the senses. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  K. Zilles,et al.  Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: a physiological basis for clinical dissociations. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[20]  J. Marshall,et al.  Spatial cognition: evidence from visual neglect , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[22]  F. Vidal,et al.  Functional Anatomy of the Attentional Modulation of Time Estimation , 2004, Science.

[23]  J C Mazziotta,et al.  Reafferent copies of imitated actions in the right superior temporal cortex , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  R T Knight,et al.  Neural representations of skilled movement. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Spatial Cognition: Where We Were and Where We Are , 2001, NeuroImage.

[26]  Georg Goldenberg,et al.  Defective pantomime of object use in left brain damage: apraxia or asymbolia? , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  E. Renzi,et al.  Imitating gestures. A quantitative approach to ideomotor apraxia. , 1980, Archives of neurology.

[28]  Thomas Stephan,et al.  Performing allocentric visuospatial judgments with induced distortion of the egocentric reference frame: an fMRI study with clinical implications , 2003, NeuroImage.

[29]  Elisabetta Làdavas,et al.  RIGHT HEMISPHERE DAMAGE. , 2000 .

[30]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[31]  D. Kimura,et al.  Left-hemisphere control of oral and brachial movements and their relation to communication. , 1982, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[32]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Lateralized Cognitive Processes and Lateralized Task Control in the Human Brain , 2003, Science.

[33]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Neural basis of pantomiming the use of visually presented objects , 2004, NeuroImage.

[34]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  Klaas E. Stephan,et al.  Yearning to yawn: the neural basis of contagious yawning , 2005, NeuroImage.

[36]  K. Zilles,et al.  Difficulty of perceptual spatiotemporal integration modulates the neural activity of left inferior parietal cortex , 2005, Neuroscience.

[37]  K. Zilles,et al.  The role of ventral medial wall motor areas in bimanual co-ordination. A combined lesion and activation study. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[38]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[39]  Toshio Inui,et al.  Neural correlates of semantic effects on grasping familiar objects , 2003, Neuroreport.

[40]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[41]  K M Heilman,et al.  Pantomime comprehension and ideomotor apraxia. , 1985, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[42]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Brain Activation Induced by Estimation of Duration: A PET Study , 1996, NeuroImage.

[43]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[44]  D. Kimura,et al.  Motor functions of the left hemisphere. , 1974, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[45]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  Gender differences in the functional neuroanatomy of emotional episodic autobiographical memory , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[46]  G. Goldenberg Matching and imitation of hand and finger posturesin patients with damage in the left or right hemispheres , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  R. Turner,et al.  Characterizing Evoked Hemodynamics with fMRI , 1995, NeuroImage.

[48]  A. Nobre,et al.  Where and When to Pay Attention: The Neural Systems for Directing Attention to Spatial Locations and to Time Intervals as Revealed by Both PET and fMRI , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  Are action and perception in near and far space additive or interactive factors? , 2003, NeuroImage.

[50]  K. Zilles,et al.  Neural mechanisms associated with attention to temporal synchrony versus spatial orientation: an fMRI study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[51]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  Cerebral correlates of alerting, orienting and reorienting of visuospatial attention: an event-related fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[52]  T Shallice,et al.  The domain of supervisory processes and temporal organization of behaviour. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[53]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neural Circuits Underlying Imitation Learning of Hand Actions An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2004, Neuron.

[54]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The Mind's Eye—Precuneus Activation in Memory-Related Imagery , 1995, NeuroImage.

[55]  Georg Goldenberg,et al.  Imitating gestures and manipulating a mannikin—The representation of the human body in ideomotor apraxia , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[56]  J. Cohen,et al.  Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. , 2000, Science.

[57]  K. Poeck Ideational apraxia , 2004, Journal of Neurology.

[58]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[59]  K. Zilles,et al.  The Neural Basis of Vertical and Horizontal Line Bisection Judgments: An fMRI Study of Normal Volunteers , 2001, NeuroImage.

[60]  J. Moll,et al.  Functional MRI correlates of real and imagined tool-use pantomimes , 2000, Neurology.