Two-Stage Screening for Math Problem-Solving Difficulty Using Dynamic Assessment of Algebraic Learning

The purpose of this study was to explore the utility of a dynamic assessment (DA) of algebraic learning in predicting third graders’ development of mathematics word-problem difficulty. In the fall, 122 third-grade students were assessed on a test of math word-problem skill and DA of algebraic learning. In the spring, they were assessed on word-problem performance. Logistic regression was conducted to contrast two models. One relied exclusively on the fall test of math word-problem skill to predict word-problem difficulty on the spring outcome (less than the 25th percentile). The second model relied on a combination of the fall test of math word-problem skill and the fall DA to predict the same outcome. Holding sensitivity at 87.5%, the universal screener alone resulted in a high proportion of false positives, which was practically reduced when DA was included in the prediction model. Findings are discussed in terms of a two-stage process for screening students within a responsiveness-to-intervention prevention model.

[1]  Jeffrey Pope,et al.  State of the art and future directions , 2001 .

[2]  Carol S. Lidz,et al.  Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential. , 1987 .

[3]  Yaacov Rand,et al.  The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments and techniques , 1981 .

[4]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Problem Solving and Computational Skill: Are They Shared or Distinct Aspects of Mathematical Cognition? , 2008, Journal of educational psychology.

[5]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Mathematics Screening and Progress Monitoring at First Grade: Implications for Responsiveness to Intervention , 2007 .

[6]  T. Schack,et al.  Dynamic testing , 2003 .

[7]  Mm. Liabre.  Standard Progressive Matrices , 1984 .

[8]  H. Carl Haywood,et al.  The Development of Interactive-Dynamic Approaches to Assessment of Learning Potential , 1992 .

[9]  David J. Chard,et al.  Using Measures of Number Sense to Screen for Difficulties in Mathematics: Preliminary Findings , 2005 .

[10]  Janet E. Spector.  Predicting Progress in Beginning Reading: Dynamic Assessment of Phonemic Awareness , 1992 .

[11]  Mark R. Shinn,et al.  A Preliminary Investigation Into the Identification and Development of Early Mathematics Curriculum-Based Measurement , 2004 .

[12]  Douglas Fuchs,et al.  Effects of Preventative Tutoring on the Mathematical Problem Solving of Third-Grade Students with Math and Reading Difficulties , 2008, Exceptional children.

[13]  R. Woodcock.  Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised , 1987 .

[14]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Selecting At-Risk Readers in First Grade for Early Intervention: A Two-Year Longitudinal Study of Decision Rules and Procedures , 2006 .

[15]  J A Swets,et al.  The science of choosing the right decision threshold in high-stakes diagnostics. , 1992, The American psychologist.

[16]  J. Campione,et al.  Children's learning and transfer of inductive reasoning rules: studies of proximal development. , 1986, Child development.

[17]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. , 1987 .

[18]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  The Predictive Utility of Kindergarten Screening for Math Difficulty , 2010 .

[19]  R. Feuerstein,et al.  The dynamic assessment of retarded performers , 1979 .

[20]  M. Budoff,et al.  Learning potential among institutionalized young adult retardates. , 1967, American journal of mental deficiency.

[21]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Making “secondary intervention” work in a three-tier responsiveness-to-intervention model: findings from the first-grade longitudinal reading study of the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities , 2008 .

[22]  D. Speece,et al.  Dynamic assessment, individual differences, and academic achievement. , 1990 .

[23]  D. Laplane.  Thought and language. , 1992, Behavioural neurology.

[24]  John A. Swets.  The science of choosing the right decision threshold in high-stakes diagnostics. , 1992 .

[25]  J. Campione.  Assisted Assessment , 1989, Journal of learning disabilities.

[26]  Sheri Berkeley,et al.  Implementation of Response to Intervention , 2009, Journal of learning disabilities.

[27]  Nancy Mather,et al.  Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities. , 2009 .

[28]  H. Lee Swanson,et al.  Children with Reading Disabilities: Does Dynamic Assessment Help in the Classification? , 2005 .

[29]  Ruth Fielding-Barnsley,et al.  Effects of preschool phoneme identity training after six years: Outcome level distinguished from rate of response. , 2000 .

[30]  Bruce A. Murray,et al.  The Test of Phoneme Identities: Predicting Alphabetic Insight in Prealphabetic Readers , 2000 .

[31]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Dynamic Assessment of Algebraic Learning in Predicting Third Graders' Development of Mathematical Problem Solving. , 2008, Journal of educational psychology.