Abstract The Imperial Shag (Phalacrocorax atriceps) is monomorphic in plumage, but males are larger than females. We analyzed the sexual size dimorphism and variability of six morphometric characteristics (bill length, bill depth, head length, tarsus length, wing length, and body mass) measured on 291 breeding Imperial Shags at Punta León colony in coastal Patagonia, Argentina, during 2004 and 2005 breeding seasons. Discriminant analyses were performed on external measurements that we considered potentially useful in sexing Imperial Shags. All the birds were sexed by a distinctive behavior (vocalizations) and a sub sample of fifty were also sexed by DNA-based genetic techniques, showing 100% agreement between the two methods. All measured characteristics differed between the sexes, with males being larger than females. Body mass (17.8-18.0%) and bill depth (12.8-13.2%) showed the highest level of dimorphism whereas bill, head, tarsus, and wing length were less dimorphic (ranging 4.8-6.0%). Dimorphism in body mass for breeding shags was lower than previously reported during winter, prior to the breeding season. Although the wing length showed the lowest degree of dimorphism (5.3-5.4%), it presented the lowest coefficient of variation (1.9-2.0%) resulting in the most accurate single-measurement indicating sex. A cross validation process with a new sample, revealed that discriminant functions comprised by two characteristics were more accurate and reliable for sex determination than single-measurements. We obtained two functions correctly classifying 94-97% of shags. These functions were reliable (similar accuracy for discriminant analysis, Jackknifed validation, and cross-validation with a new sample) and seasonal unbiased, as body mass was not included in the analysis.
[1]
S. Wanless,et al.
Determining food intake by great Cormorants and European shags with electronic balances
,
1996
.
[2]
R. Furness,et al.
Predicting the Sex of Parasitic Jaegers by Discriminant Analysis
,
1997
.
[3]
H. Ellegren,et al.
First gene on the avian W chromosome (CHD) provides a tag for universal sexing of non-ratite birds.
,
1996,
Proceedings. Biological sciences.
[4]
K. Hamer,et al.
Sexing terns using biometrics: the advantage of within-pair comparisons
,
2003
.
[5]
J. A. Franeker,et al.
Applicability of external measurements to sexing of the Cape petrel Daption capense at within-pair, within-population and between-population scales
,
1998
.
[6]
R. Casaux,et al.
Sexual Size Dimorphism in the Antarctic Shag
,
2000
.
[7]
M. Hall,et al.
Sexing Adult King Cormorants (Phalacrocorax albiventer) by Discriminant Analysis
,
1988
.
[8]
R. Murphy.
Oceanic birds of South America
,
1936
.
[9]
R. Lanctot,et al.
Sexing adult black-legged kittiwakes by DNA behavior, and morphology
,
2000
.
[10]
B. Tabachnick,et al.
Using Multivariate Statistics
,
1983
.
[11]
Ricardo Casaux.
Biología reproductiva y ecología alimentaria del Cormorán antártico Phalacrocorax bransfieldensis (Aves: phalacrocoracidae) en las Islas Shetland del Sur, Antártida
,
1998
.
[12]
G. R. Potts.
The Influence of Eruptive Movements, Age, Population Size and Other Factors on the Survival of the Shag (Phalacrocorax aristotelis (L.))
,
1969
.
[13]
J. Croxall.
Sexual size dimorphism in seabirds
,
1995
.