Citizen satisfaction with contacting government on the internet

This study looks at the satisfaction with their contact experience of citizens using the internet to contact government. Due to the internet, the volume of citizen contacts with government has increased. Presumably the ease and convenience compared to traditional contact modes has stimulated government contacting via the internet. Analysis of the July 2003 Pew E-Government Survey finds that Americans who use the internet to contact government express higher satisfaction levels with their contact experience when controlling for demographics, level of government contacted, reason for the contact, and assessments of the contact process and outcome. However, many internet users also complain of problems in using the internet for contacting government. These problems may outweigh the ease and convenience of internet contacting and may imperil the internet as a way of connecting citizens and government. Suggestions for improving the internet as a medium through which citizens contact government are discussed.

[1]  J. C. Thomas,et al.  The New Face of Government: Citizen-Initiated Contacts in the Era of E-Government , 2003 .

[2]  Kenneth R. Mladenka.  Citizen Demands and Urban Services: The Distribution of Bureaucratic Response in Chicago and Houston , 1981 .

[3]  George Serra,et al.  Citizen-Initiated Contact and Satisfaction With Bureaucracy: A Multivariate Analysis , 1995 .

[4]  Steven A. Peterson.  Close Encounters of the Bureaucratic Kind: Older Americans and Bureaucracy , 1986 .

[5]  Gerald Grant,et al.  Developing a Generic Framework for E-Government , 2005, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[6]  J. C. Thomas,et al.  Citizen-initiated Contacts with Government Agencies: A Test of Three Theories , 1982 .

[7]  S. W. Yackee,et al.  Understanding public support for the US federal bureaucracy , 2005 .

[8]  Caroline J. Tolbert,et al.  Virtual Inequality: Beyond the Digital Divide , 2004, Perspectives on Politics.

[9]  Jonathan P. West,et al.  Citizens' Contacts with Bureaucratic and Legislative Officials , 1993 .

[10]  Carl J. Cuneo,et al.  Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2003 .

[11]  N. Nie,et al.  Participation in America : Political Democracy and Social Equality , 1972 .

[12]  P. Norris.  Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2001 .

[13]  Bryan D. Jones,et al.  Bureaucratic Response to Citizen-Initiated Contacts: Environmental Enforcement in Detroit , 1977, American Political Science Review.

[14]  P. Norris,et al.  Digital Divide: Civic Engagement , 2001 .

[15]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics , 1996 .

[16]  Elaine B. Sharp,et al.  Citizen Perceptions of Channels for Urban Service Advocacy , 1980 .

[17]  C. Hood,et al.  The Middle Aging of New Public Management: Into the Age of Paradox? , 2004 .

[18]  H. Brinton Milward,et al.  Electronic Government: Linking Citizens to Public Organizations Through Technology , 1996 .

[19]  Agneta Ranerup,et al.  Consumerism revisited: The emergent roles of new electronic intermediaries between citizens and the public sector , 2003, Inf. Polity.

[20]  Marc J. Hetherington,et al.  Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism , 2004 .

[21]  Bruce Bimber.  The Internet and Citizen Communication With Government: Does the Medium Matter? , 1999 .

[22]  C. Goodsell.  The Case For Bureaucracy , 1983 .

[23]  Gordon Tullock,et al.  The Politics of Bureaucracy. , 1966 .