Decision support for diffuse pollution management

The effort to manage diffuse pollution at the catchment scale is an ongoing challenge that needs to take into account trade-offs between environmental and economic objectives. Best Management Practices (BMPs) are gaining ground as a means to address the problem, but their application (and impact) is highly dependant on the characteristics of the crops and of the land in which they are to be applied. In this paper, we demonstrate a new methodology and associated decision support tool that suggests the optimal location for placing BMPs to minimise diffuse surface water pollution at the catchment scale, by determining the trade-off among economic and multiple environmental objectives. The decision support tool consists of a non-point source (NPS) pollution estimator, the SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model, a genetic algorithm (GA), which serves as the optimisation engine for the selection and placement of BMPs across the agricultural land of the catchment, and of an empirical economic function for the estimation of the mean annual cost of BMP implementation. In the proposed decision support tool, SWAT was run a number of times equal to the number of tested BMPs, to predict nitrates nitrogen (N-NO3) and total phosphorus (TP) losses from all the agricultural Hydrologic Response Units (HRUs) and possible BMPs implemented on them. The results were then saved in a database which was subsequently used for the optimisation process. Fifty different BMPs, including sole or combined changes in livestock, crop, soil and nutrient application management in alfalfa, corn and pastureland fields, were evaluated in the reported application of the tool in a catchment in Greece, by solving a three-objective optimisation process (cost, TP and N-NO3). The relevant two-dimensional trade-off curves of cost-TP, cost-N-NO3 and N-NO3-TP are presented and discussed. The strictest environmental target, expressed as a 45% reduction of TP at the catchment outlet, which also resulted in a 25% reduction of the annual N-NO3 yield was met at an affordable annual cost of 25 @?/person by establishing an optimal combination of BMPs. The methodology could be used to assist in a more cost-effective implementation of environmental legislation.

[1]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multi-objective Genetic Algorithms: Problem Difficulties and Construction of Test Problems , 1999, Evolutionary Computation.

[2]  M. Donatelli,et al.  Integrated assessment of agricultural systems: a component - based framework for the European Union (Seamless) , 2008 .

[3]  Peter Strauss,et al.  AgriBMPWater: systems approach to environmentally acceptable farming , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[4]  Carlo Giupponi,et al.  Towards the development of a decision support system for water resource management , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[5]  Tommy Dalgaard,et al.  Monitoring strategies and scale-appropriate hydrologic and biogeochemical modelling for natural resource management: Conclusions and recommendations from a session held at the iEMSs 2008 , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[6]  Horst Behrendt,et al.  Retention of nutrients in river systems: dependence on specific runoff and hydraulic load , 1999, Hydrobiologia.

[7]  Silvia Secchi,et al.  Least-cost control of agricultural nutrient contributions to the Gulf of Mexico hypoxic zone. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[8]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions , 2007 .

[9]  S. Mooney,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of actions to mitigate nutrient loss from agriculture: a review of methods. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  M. Arabi,et al.  Cost‐effective allocation of watershed management practices using a genetic algorithm , 2006 .

[11]  Carlo Giupponi,et al.  A decision support tool for simulating the effects of alternative policies affecting water resources: an application at the European scale , 2005 .

[12]  Avi Ostfeld,et al.  State of the Art for Genetic Algorithms and Beyond in Water Resources Planning and Management , 2010 .

[13]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Scenario analysis and management options for sustainable river basin management: Application of the Elbe DSS , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  Graeme J. Doole,et al.  Evaluating Input Standards for Non‐Point Pollution Control under Firm Heterogeneity , 2010 .

[15]  Christos Makropoulos,et al.  Diffuse Surface Water Pollution: Driving Factors for Different Geoclimatic Regions , 2011 .

[16]  Tong Heng Lee,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms for Multi-Objective Optimization: Performance Assessments and Comparisons , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat. No.01TH8546).

[17]  Christos Makropoulos,et al.  A multi-objective evolutionary programming approach to the ‘object location’ spatial analysis and optimisation problem within the urban water management domain , 2005 .

[18]  Boris Kompare,et al.  Environmental Modelling & Software , 2014 .

[19]  Martin Volk,et al.  Integrated ecological-economic modelling of water pollution abatement management options in the Upper Ems River Basin , 2008 .

[20]  A. R. Jarrett,et al.  WATERSHED LEVEL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE SELECTION AND PLACEMENT IN THE TOWN BROOK WATERSHED, NEW YORK1 , 2006 .

[21]  Bruno Cheviron,et al.  Vegetated filter effects on sedimentological connectivity of agricultural catchments in erosion modelling: a review , 2011 .

[22]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[23]  Misgana K. Muleta,et al.  Evolutionary algorithms for multiobjective evaluation of watershed management decisions , 2002 .

[24]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[25]  N. C. Thanasoulias,et al.  Assessment of River Water Quality in Northwestern Greece , 2005 .

[26]  E. G. Bekele,et al.  Multiobjective management of ecosystem services by integrative watershed modeling and evolutionary algorithms , 2005 .

[27]  M. Arabi,et al.  Representation of agricultural conservation practices with SWAT , 2008 .

[28]  P. Stålnacke.  Nutrient loads to the Baltic Sea , 1996 .

[29]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  A modeling approach to evaluate the impacts of water quality management plans implemented in a watershed in Texas , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[30]  Indrajeet Chaubey,et al.  Development of a multiobjective optimization tool for the selection and placement of best management practices for nonpoint source pollution control , 2009 .

[31]  Hans Peter Schwefel.  Advantages (and Disadvantages) of Evolutionary Computation Over Other Approaches , 1997 .

[32]  C. Makropoulos,et al.  Reducing surface water pollution through the assessment of the cost-effectiveness of BMPs at different spatial scales. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[33]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  An integrated approach to linking economic valuation and catchment modelling , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[34]  Christos Makropoulos,et al.  SWAT Parameterization for the Identification of Critical Diffuse Pollution Source Areas under Data Limitations , 2011 .

[35]  W. J. Gburek,et al.  FARM-LEVEL OPTIMIZATION OF BMP PLACEMENT FOR COST-EFFECTIVE POLLUTION REDUCTION , 2004 .

[36]  N. Skoulikidis,et al.  Analysis of factors driving stream water composition and synthesis of management tools--a case study on small/medium Greek catchments. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[37]  Carlo Giupponi,et al.  Decision Support Systems for implementing the European Water Framework Directive: The MULINO approach , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[38]  Misgana K. Muleta,et al.  Decision Support for Watershed Management Using Evolutionary Algorithms , 2005 .

[39]  G. Zervas.  Quantifying and optimizing grazing regimes in Greek mountain systems , 2008 .

[40]  Tong Heng Lee,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms for Multi-Objective Optimization: Performance Assessments and Comparisons , 2004, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[41]  Mary Leigh Wolfe,et al.  Cost-effective BMP placement: Optimization versus targeting , 2004 .

[42]  R. K. Ursem.  Multi-objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms , 2009 .

[43]  Ilona Bärlund,et al.  Assessing SWAT model performance in the evaluation of management actions for the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in a Finnish catchment , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[44]  Philip W. Gassman,et al.  Optimal placement of conservation practices using genetic algorithm with SWAT. , 2009 .

[45]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2009 , 2011 .

[46]  L. M. Svendsen,et al.  Retention of nutrients in river basins , 1999, Aquatic Ecology.

[47]  B. Kronvang,et al.  Mitigation options for nutrient reduction in surface water and groundwaters , 2007 .

[48]  Lachlan T. H. Newham,et al.  Integrating farming systems and landscape processes to assess management impacts on suspended sediment loads , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[49]  Jimmy R. Williams.  Sediment Routing for Agricultural Watersheds , 1975 .

[50]  Brian Kronvang,et al.  Mitigation options for reducing nutrient emissions from agriculture : a study amongst European member states of Cost action 869 , 2011 .

[51]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[52]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[53]  Lei Wang,et al.  A Review of Modelling Tools for Implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive in Handling Diffuse Water Pollution , 2010 .

[54]  Mary Leigh Wolfe,et al.  Optimization Procedure for Cost Effective BMP Placement at a Watershed Scale , 2003 .

[55]  Martin Volk,et al.  A SDSS-based Ecological-economic Modelling Approach for Integrated River Basin Management on Different Scale Levels – The Project FLUMAGIS , 2007 .

[56]  Steven Broekx,et al.  Coupling a hydrological water quality model and an economic optimization model to set up a cost-effective emission reduction scenario for nitrogen , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[57]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  A GIS‐Coupled Hydrological Model System for the Watershed Assessment of Agricultural Nonpoint and Point Sources of Pollution , 2004, Trans. GIS.