Parsing and interpreting ambiguous structures in spatial hypermedia

When reflecting on information, spatial hypermedia users express their understanding of the information's structure visually. In order to facilitate this process, spatial hypermedia uses spatial parsers that enable systems to infer the structure of information based on the implicit relationships between components of the representation. This paper describes the two main purposes of spatial parsers in spatial hypermedia systems and how particular parsing approaches and features influence their effectiveness and responsiveness. An alternative approach that provides better support for ambiguity and adaptability is instantiated in FLAPS, an adaptive spatial parser that uses fuzzy-logic in order to infer the implicit structure of spatial hypermedia. The comparison of FLAPS to other parsers reveals benefits of supporting ambiguous structures by computing multiple possible interpretations and identifies limitations that provide goals for future spatial parsers.

[1]  Frank M. Shipman,et al.  Finding and using implicit structure in human-organized spatial layouts of information , 1995, CHI '95.

[2]  Peter Ørbæk,et al.  Finding hyper-structure in space: spatial parsing in 3D , 2001, New Rev. Hypermedia Multim..

[3]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[4]  Satoshi Matsuoka,et al.  Adaptive recognition of implicit structures in human-organized layouts , 1995, Proceedings of Symposium on Visual Languages.

[5]  Peter J. Nürnberg,et al.  CAOS: a collaborative and open spatial structure service component with incremental spatial parsing , 1999, HYPERTEXT '99.

[6]  J. Yen,et al.  Fuzzy Logic: Intelligence, Control, and Information , 1998 .

[7]  Frank M. Shipman,et al.  VIKI: spatial hypertext supporting emergent structure , 1994, ECHT '94.

[8]  Frank M. Shipman,et al.  Instructional information in adaptive spatial hypertext , 2004, DocEng '04.

[9]  Alison Kidd,et al.  The marks are on the knowledge worker , 1994, CHI '94.

[10]  J. Michael Moore,et al.  Communicating requirements using end-user GUI constructions with argumentation , 2003, 18th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings..

[11]  Frank M. Shipman,et al.  The visual knowledge builder: a second generation spatial hypertext , 2001, HYPERTEXT '01.

[12]  George Buchanan,et al.  Integrating information seeking and structuring: exploring the role of spatial hypertext in a digital library , 2004, HYPERTEXT '04.

[13]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  Cognitive coherence relations and hypertext: from cinematic patterns to scholarly discourse , 2001, HYPERTEXT '01.

[14]  Frank M. Shipman,et al.  Managing conflict in multi-model adaptive hypertext , 2004, HYPERTEXT '04.

[15]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  How do people organize their desks?: Implications for the design of office information systems , 1983, TOIS.

[16]  Frank M. Shipman,et al.  Searching for the missing link: discovering implicit structure in spatial hypertext , 1993, Hypertext.

[17]  Shingo Takada,et al.  Two-dimensional spatial positioning as a means for reflection in design , 2000, DIS '00.

[18]  Frank M. Shipman,et al.  WARP: a web-based dynamic spatial hypertext , 2004, HYPERTEXT '04.

[19]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Aquanet: a hypertext tool to hold your knowledge in place , 1991, HYPERTEXT '91.

[20]  Peter Ørbæk,et al.  Towards geo-spatial hypermedia: Concepts and prototype implementation , 2002, HYPERTEXT '02.

[21]  Donald A. Sch The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action , 1983 .

[22]  Frank M. Shipman,et al.  VITE: a visual interface supporting the direct manipulation of structured data using two-way mappings , 2000, IUI '00.

[23]  Donald A. Schön The reflective practitioner : how professionals think in action , 1986 .

[24]  Luis Francisco-Revilla,et al.  Multi-model adaptive spatial hypertext , 2004 .