Human radiolabeled mass balance studies: objectives, utilities and limitations.

The determination of metabolic pathways of a drug candidate through the identification of circulating and excreted metabolites is vitally important to understanding its physical and biological effects. Knowledge of metabolite profiles of a drug candidate in animals and humans is essential to ensure that animal species used in toxicological evaluations of new drug candidates are appropriate models of humans. The recent FDA final guidance recommends that human oxidative metabolites whose exposure exceeds 10% of the parent AUC at steady-state should be assessed in at least one of the preclinical animal species used in toxicological assessment. Additional toxicological testing on metabolites that have higher exposure in humans than in preclinical species may be required. The metabolite profiles in laboratory animals and humans are generally accomplished by mass balance and excretion studies in which radiolabeled drugs are administered to these species. The biological fluids are collected, analysed for total radioactivity and evaluated for a quantitative profile of metabolites. Thus, these studies not only determine the rates and routes of excretion but also provide very critical information on the metabolic pathways of drugs in preclinical species and humans. In addition, these studies are required by regulatory agencies for the new drug approval process. Despite the usefulness of these radiolabeled mass balance studies, there is little concrete guidance on how to perform or assess these complex studies. This article examines the objectives, utilities and limitations of these studies and how these studies could be used for the determination of the metabolite exposure in animals and humans.

[1]  D. Gurwitz,et al.  CYP2D6 genotyping for psychiatric patients treated with risperidone: considerations for cost-effectiveness studies. , 2009, Pharmacogenomics.

[2]  Philip Timmerman,et al.  Which human metabolites have we MIST? Retrospective analysis, practical aspects, and perspectives for metabolite identification and quantification in pharmaceutical development. , 2009, Chemical research in toxicology.

[3]  K. Pang,et al.  Disparity in Intestine Disposition between Formed and Preformed Metabolites and Implications: A Theoretical Study , 2009, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[4]  M. Morris,et al.  Formed and preformed metabolites: facts and comparisons , 2008, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[5]  C. Prakash,et al.  Metabolism, Pharmacokinetics, and Excretion of a Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibitor, Torcetrapib, in Rats, Monkeys, and Mice: Characterization of Unusual and Novel Metabolites by High-Resolution Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry and 1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance , 2008, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[6]  C. Prakash,et al.  Disposition of Lasofoxifene, a Next-Generation Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator, in Healthy Male Subjects , 2008, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[7]  Leslie Z Benet,et al.  Predicting drug disposition, absorption/elimination/transporter interplay and the role of food on drug absorption. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[8]  Vinod P. Shah,et al.  The Use of BDDCS in Classifying the Permeability of Marketed Drugs , 2008, Pharmaceutical Research.

[9]  Steven R Tannenbaum,et al.  Application of liquid chromatography-accelerator mass spectrometry (LC-AMS) to evaluate the metabolic profiles of a drug candidate in human urine and plasma. , 2007, Drug metabolism letters.

[10]  Angus Nedderman,et al.  Analytical strategies for identifying drug metabolites. , 2007, Mass spectrometry reviews.

[11]  C. L. Shaffer,et al.  Metabolism of a 14C/3H-labeled GABAA receptor partial agonist in rat, dog and human liver microsomes: evaluation of a dual-radiolabel strategy. , 2007, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[12]  R. Obach,et al.  What is the Objective of the Mass Balance Study? A Retrospective Analysis of Data in Animal and Human Excretion Studies Employing Radiolabeled Drugs , 2007, Drug metabolism reviews.

[13]  Thomayant Prueksaritanont,et al.  Complicating factors in safety testing of drug metabolites: kinetic differences between generated and preformed metabolites. , 2006, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[14]  R Scott Obach,et al.  Metabolites and safety: What are the concerns, and how should we address them? , 2006, Chemical research in toxicology.

[15]  Malcolm Rowland,et al.  Use of microdosing to predict pharmacokinetics at the therapeutic dose: Experience with 5 drugs , 2006, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[16]  C. L. Shaffer,et al.  Using a Tritiated Compound to Elucidate Its Preclinical Metabolic and Excretory Pathways in Vivo: Exploring Tritium Exchange Risk , 2006, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[17]  M. Jemal,et al.  METABOLISM OF [14C]GEMOPATRILAT AFTER ORAL ADMINISTRATION TO RATS, DOGS, AND HUMANS , 2006, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[18]  W. Richter,et al.  The distribution pattern of radioactivity across different tissues in quantitative whole-body autoradiography (QWBA) studies. , 2006, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[19]  P. Sandin,et al.  Introduction to early in vitro identification of metabolites of new chemical entities in drug discovery and development. , 2006, Pharmacological reports : PR.

[20]  Joelle M. R. Gola,et al.  Focus on success: using a probabilistic approach to achieve an optimal balance of compound properties in drug discovery , 2006, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[21]  Hua Yang,et al.  EVALUATION OF MICRODOSING TO ASSESS PHARMACOKINETIC LINEARITY IN RATS USING LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY-TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY , 2006, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[22]  J. Schellens,et al.  Mass Balance Studies, with a Focus on Anticancer Drugs , 2006, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[23]  R Scott Obach,et al.  SEEING THROUGH THE MIST: ABUNDANCE VERSUS PERCENTAGE. COMMENTARY ON METABOLITES IN SAFETY TESTING , 2005, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[24]  Weiping Zhao,et al.  Analysis of low level radioactive metabolites in biological fluids using high-performance liquid chromatography with microplate scintillation counting: method validation and application. , 2005, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[25]  C. Prakash,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION OF A NOVEL METABOLITE INTERMEDIATE OF ZIPRASIDONE IN HEPATIC CYTOSOLIC FRACTIONS OF RAT, DOG, AND HUMAN BY ESI-MS/MS, HYDROGEN/DEUTERIUM EXCHANGE, AND CHEMICAL DERIVATIZATION , 2005, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[26]  David Q. Liu,et al.  Strategies for characterization of drug metabolites using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in conjunction with chemical derivatization and on-line H/D exchange approaches. , 2005, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[27]  K. Brune,et al.  Cytochrome P450 Polymorphisms in Geriatric Patients , 2005, Drugs & aging.

[28]  M. P. Baker,et al.  EVALUATION OF MICRODOSING STRATEGIES FOR STUDIES IN PRECLINICAL DRUG DEVELOPMENT: DEMONSTRATION OF LINEAR PHARMACOKINETICS IN DOGS OF A NUCLEOSIDE ANALOG OVER A 50-FOLD DOSE RANGE , 2004, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[29]  A. Palmer,et al.  The pivotal role of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics in the discovery and development of new medicines. , 2004, IDrugs : the investigational drugs journal.

[30]  Andrew M Davis,et al.  Predictive ADMET studies, the challenges and the opportunities. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[31]  I. Kola,et al.  Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[32]  Y. Parmentier,et al.  Liquid chromatography-accurate radioisotope counting and microplate scintillation counter technologies in drug metabolism studies. , 2004, Journal of chromatographic science.

[33]  B. Hughey,et al.  An interface for direct analysis of (14)c in nonvolatile samples by accelerator mass spectrometry. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[34]  Matthew Segall,et al.  In silico prediction of ADME properties: are we making progress? , 2004, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[35]  Leslie Z. Benet,et al.  Predicting Drug Disposition via Application of BCS: Transport/Absorption/ Elimination Interplay and Development of a Biopharmaceutics Drug Disposition Classification System , 2004, Pharmaceutical Research.

[36]  Abigail Jacobs,et al.  Drug metabolites in safety testing. , 2003, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[37]  G. Patonay,et al.  High-throughput inhibition screening of major human cytochrome P450 enzymes using an in vitro cocktail and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. , 2003, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[38]  T. Baillie,et al.  Drug metabolites in safety testing. , 2002, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[39]  E. Solon,et al.  Quantitative whole-body autoradiography in the pharmaceutical industry. Survey results on study design, methods, and regulatory compliance. , 2001, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[40]  K A Bachmann,et al.  The use of in vitro methods to predict in vivo pharmacokinetics and drug interactions. , 2001, Current drug metabolism.

[41]  G. Bruin,et al.  Use of a microplate scintillation counter as a radioactivity detector for miniaturized separation techniques in drug metabolism. , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[42]  L. Lesko,et al.  Optimizing the Science of Drug Development: Opportunities for Better Candidate Selection and Accelerated Evaluation in Humans , 2000, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[43]  D. Tweedie,et al.  Identification of the major human liver cytochrome P450 isoform(s) responsible for the formation of the primary metabolites of ziprasidone and prediction of possible drug interactions. , 2000, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[44]  C. Hop,et al.  Plasma-pooling methods to increase throughput for in vivo pharmacokinetic screening. , 1998, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[45]  The search for orally active medications through combinatorial chemistry , 1998, Medicinal research reviews.

[46]  A. Clifford,et al.  Protocol development for biological tracer studies. , 1998, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[47]  K. Wilner,et al.  Metabolism and excretion of a new antipsychotic drug, ziprasidone, in humans. , 1997, Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals.

[48]  C. Prakash,et al.  Metabolism and excretion of the novel antipsychotic drug ziprasidone in rats after oral administration of a mixture of 14C- and 3H-labeled ziprasidone. , 1997, Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals.

[49]  R A Hamilton,et al.  Determination of mean valproic acid serum level by assay of a single pooled sample , 1981, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.