PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY

Summary From the postwar period until the present time, the development of project managementhas radically changed structures and processes within car manufacturing companies. But onthe reverse, we can say that project management had been changed by its implementationwithin the automotive context: from technique and tool orientation to more strategic andorganizational approaches, from highly precise contractualized relation patterns to proce-dural open learning ‘‘meta-rules.’’ The auto industry was a latecomer to project manage-ment, compared to military equipment or construction business. But these sectors are nowtrying to transform there project management tradition and adopt the project managementpractices that were developed in the late 1980s and 1990s in the auto sector. We can seevarious reasons behind such a dragging effect: the economic importance and symbolic no-toriety of the auto sector, of course, but also the importance of researches in managementscience and economics in the field, that happened to evaluate the performances of variousproject patters and to trace the transformations round the world.This process is not yet complete, since performance limits are constantly increasing.

[1]  C. Midler L'auto qui n'existait pas : management des projets et transformation de l'entreprise , 1993 .

[2]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[3]  James Richardson Beyond Partnership: Strategies for Innovation and Lean Supply , 1994 .

[4]  Philippe Piron L'alliance en convergence , 2000 .

[5]  Rolf A. Lundin,et al.  Projects as Arenas for Renewal and Learning Processes , 1998 .

[6]  Christophe Midler,et al.  Project Management Learning: A Contingent Approach , 1998 .

[7]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Product development performance : strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry / Kim B. Clark, Tahahiro Fujimoto , 1991 .

[8]  Pierre-Jean Benghozi,et al.  Innovation based competition et design systems dynamics , 2000 .

[9]  Christophe Midler,et al.  Management Tools for RetD Project Portfolios in Complex Organizations – the case of an international pharmaceutical firm , 2000 .

[10]  Steven Ashley,et al.  Keys to Chrysler's comeback , 1997 .

[11]  Karen Ayas,et al.  Design for learning for innovation , 1997 .

[12]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  A framework for analyzing project dyads: the case of discontinuity, uncertainty and trust , 1998 .

[13]  T. Keelin,et al.  How SmithKline Beecham makes better resource-allocation decisions. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[14]  R. Cooper,et al.  Best Practices for Managing R&D Portfolios , 1998 .

[15]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Product Development Performance in the Auto Industry: 1990s Update , 1995 .

[16]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[17]  Jean-Pierre Ponssard,et al.  Planning in firms as an interactive process , 1993 .

[18]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. , 1987 .

[19]  Christian Navarre,et al.  Large-scale projects, self-organizing and meta-rules: towards new forms of management , 1996 .

[20]  George Jr. Stalk Hout Competing Against Time : How Time Based Competition Is Reshaping Global Markets , 2002 .

[21]  Anders Söderholm,et al.  A theory of the temporary organization , 1995 .

[22]  Peter W. G. Morris,et al.  The management of projects , 1994 .

[23]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .

[24]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[25]  Nalin Kulatilaka,et al.  Options Thinking and Platform Investments: Investing in Opportunity , 1994 .

[26]  Gilles Garel,et al.  Front-Loading Problem-Solving in Co-Development: Managing the Contractual, Organizational and Cognitive Dimensions , 2000 .

[27]  Christophe Midler,et al.  Globalising the firm through cooperative projects: the case of Renault , 2002 .

[28]  Michael Burda,et al.  Revolutionizing product development , 1993 .

[29]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[30]  Christophe Midler,et al.  Innovation-Based Competition and the Dynamics of Design in Upstream Suppliers , 2001 .