The time course of working memory effects on visual attention

Previous work has generated inconsistent results with regard to what extent working memory (WM) content guides visual attention. Some studies found effects of easy to verbalize stimuli, whereas others only found an influence of visual memory content. To resolve this, we compared the time courses of memory-based attentional guidance for different memory types. Participants first memorized a colour, which was either easy or difficult to verbalize. They then looked for an unrelated target in a visual search display and finally completed a memory test. One of the distractors in the search display could have the memorized colour. We varied the time between the to-be-remembered colour and the search display, as well as the ease with which the colours could be verbalized. We found that the influence of easy to verbalize WM content on visual search decreased with increasing time, whereas the influence of visual WM content was sustained. However, visual working memory effects on attention also decreased when the duration of visual encoding was limited by an additional task or when the memory item was presented only briefly. We propose that for working memory effects on visual attention to be sustained, a sufficiently strong visual representation is necessary.

[1]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Common neural substrates for visual working memory and attention , 2007, NeuroImage.

[2]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[3]  R H Logie,et al.  Interference with visual short-term memory. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[4]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  A Solution to the Effect of Sample Size on Outlier Elimination , 1994 .

[5]  Min-Shik Kim,et al.  The guidance effect of working memory load on visual search , 2010 .

[6]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Min-Shik Kim,et al.  Do the contents of working memory capture attention? Yes, but cognitive control matters. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Munsell Color The munsell book of color , 1993 .

[9]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  The mind and brain of short-term memory. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[11]  E. Vogel,et al.  Interactions between attention and working memory , 2006, Neuroscience.

[12]  A. Baddeley Working memory: looking back and looking forward , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  Paul E. Downing,et al.  Competition in visual working memory for control of search , 2003 .

[14]  A. Baddeley,et al.  The multi-component model of working memory: Explorations in experimental cognitive psychology , 2006, Neuroscience.

[15]  R. Desimone,et al.  Responses of Neurons in Inferior Temporal Cortex during Memory- Guided Visual Search , 1998 .

[16]  Christian N L Olivers,et al.  Interactions between visual working memory and visual attention. , 2008, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[17]  C. Frith,et al.  Neural Correlates of Attentional Capture in Visual Search , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[19]  David Soto,et al.  Automatic guidance of visual attention from verbal working memory. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Dissociating the neural mechanisms of memory-based guidance of visual selection , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  A Baddeley,et al.  The fractionation of working memory. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Processing of color words activates color representations , 2009, Cognition.

[23]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[24]  G. Altmann,et al.  Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm , 2005, Cognition.

[25]  P. Roelfsema,et al.  The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Stressing the mind: The effect of cognitive load and articulatory suppression on attentional guidance from working memory , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  G. Woodman,et al.  Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  M. Chun,et al.  Interactions between attention and memory , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[30]  C. Bundesen A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[31]  G. Woodman,et al.  Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[33]  C. Olivers What drives memory-driven attentional capture , 2010 .