The new fisheries multibeam echosounder ME70: description and expected contribution to fisheries research

Recently, Simrad in collaboration with Ifremer developed a calibrated, multibeam, vertical echosounder (ME70) for fisheries research. We describe its capabilities and technical limitations. The ME70 has up to 45 beams with distinct frequencies in the range 70–120 kHz, spanning at most 150°. All beams are stabilized in vessel roll and pitch. It has reduced side-lobe levels, up to –70 dB (twoway) instead of the –25 dB (one-way) of conventional systems. We outline research areas for which the ME70 might provide new types of information and hence lead to novel insights. We illustrate the potential contributions with datasets collected in the English Channel and on the continental-shelf break of the Bay of Biscay. Finally, future research and developments using the new system are outlined.

[1]  Paul G. Fernandes,et al.  Proposals for the collection of multifrequency acoustic data , 2008 .

[2]  George R. Cutter,et al.  Accounting for scattering directivity and fish behaviour in multibeam-echosounder surveys , 2007 .

[3]  Nils Olav Handegard,et al.  Observing individual fish behavior in fish aggregations: tracking in dense fish aggregations using a split-beam echosounder. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Noël Diner,et al.  Evaluating uncertainty in measurements of fish shoal aggregate backscattering cross-section caused by small shoal size relative to beam width , 2007 .

[5]  O. Godø,et al.  Silent research vessels are not quiet. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  L. N. Andersen,et al.  New scientific multibeam systems (ME70 and MS70) for fishery research applications , 2006 .

[7]  Hans Petter Knudsen,et al.  First data from sea trials with the new MS70 multibeam sonar , 2006 .

[8]  K. Foote,et al.  Optimizing Two Targets for Calibrating a Broadband Multibeam Sonar , 2006, OCEANS 2006.

[9]  Christophe Collet,et al.  Omnidirectional multibeam sonar monitoring: applications in fisheries science , 2006 .

[10]  P. Brehmer,et al.  Fisheries Acoustics: Theory and Practice, 2nd edn , 2006 .

[11]  Dag Tjøstheim,et al.  When fish meet a trawling vessel : examining the behaviour of gadoids using a free-floating buoy and acoustic split-beam tracking , 2005 .

[12]  B. Würsig,et al.  DUSKY DOLPHIN (LAGENORHYNCHUS OBSCURUS) FORAGING IN TWO DIFFERENT HABITATS: ACTIVE ACOUSTIC DETECTION OF DOLPHINS AND THEIR PREY , 2004 .

[13]  M. Iglesias,et al.  Spatio-temporal patterns and morphological characterisation of multispecies pelagic fish schools in the North-Western Mediterranean Sea , 2003 .

[14]  François Gerlotto,et al.  The three-dimensional morphology and internal structure of clupeid schools as observed using vertical scanning multibeam sonar , 2003 .

[15]  R. Mitson,et al.  Causes and effects of underwater noise on fish abundance estimation , 2003 .

[16]  Marc Soria,et al.  Effect of external factors (environment and survey vessel) on fish school characteristics observed by echosounder and multibeam sonar in the Mediterranean Sea , 2003 .

[17]  Ingvar Huse,et al.  The effect of vessel avoidance of wintering Norwegian spring spawning herring , 2002 .

[18]  Noël Diner,et al.  Correction on school geometry and density: approach based on acoustic image simulation , 2001 .

[19]  Rodney D. Hale,et al.  Acoustic species identification in the Northwest Atlantic using digital image processing , 2000 .

[20]  Pierre Petitgas,et al.  Standard protocols for the analysis of school based data from echo sounder surveys , 2000 .

[21]  E. Simmonds,et al.  Oceanography: Fish do not avoid survey vessels , 2000, Nature.

[22]  S. Mackinson,et al.  Variation in structure and distribution of pre‐spawning Pacific herring shoals in two regions of British Columbia , 1999 .

[23]  A. Aglen,et al.  How vertical fish distribution may affect survey results , 1999 .

[24]  David A. Demer,et al.  A multiple-frequency method for potentially improving the accuracy and precision of in situ target strength measurements , 1999 .

[25]  L. V. M. Traykovski,et al.  Effects of orientation on acoustic scattering from Antarctic krill at 120 kHz , 1998 .

[26]  Ole Arve Misund,et al.  Underwater acoustics in marine fisheries and fisheries research , 1997, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[27]  Egil Ona,et al.  Acoustic sampling and signal processing near the seabed: the deadzone revisited , 1996 .

[28]  Alain Hillion,et al.  Narrowband acoustic identification of monospecific fish shoals , 1996 .

[29]  Jacques Masse,et al.  Acoustic detection of the spatial and temporal distribution of fish shoals in the Bay of Biscay , 1993 .

[30]  Pierre Fréon,et al.  Some elements on vertical avoidance of fish schools to a vessel during acoustic surveys , 1992 .

[31]  Ole Arve Misund,et al.  Swimming behaviour of fish schools in the North Sea during acoustic surveying and pelagic trawl sampling , 1992 .

[32]  Myounghee Kang,et al.  Age characteristics of walleye pollock school echoes , 2006 .

[33]  T. Knutsen,et al.  Fish behaviour and orientation-dependent backscatter in acoustic Doppler profiler data , 2005 .

[34]  Other.  Description of the ICES HAC Standard Data Exchange Format, Version 1.60 , 2005 .

[35]  Egil Ona,et al.  Recommendations for the collection of multi- frequency acoustic data , 2004 .

[36]  P. Petitgas.  A method for the identification and characterization of clusters of schools along the transect lines of fisheries-acoustic surveys , 2003 .

[37]  Christopher D. Wilson,et al.  Interactions Between Commercial Fishing and Walleye Pollock , 2003 .

[38]  A. Brierley,et al.  Identification of Southern Ocean acoustic targets using aggregation backscatter and shape characteristics , 2003 .

[39]  John K. Horne,et al.  A method for evaluating the effects of biological factors on fish target strength , 2003 .

[40]  E. Ona.  An expanded target-strength relationship for herring , 2003 .

[41]  Gary D. Melvin,et al.  Extraction and comparison of acoustic backscatter from a calibrated multi- and single-beam sonar , 2003 .

[42]  Stéphane G. Conti,et al.  Wide-bandwidth acoustical characterization of anchovy and sardine from reverberation measurements in an echoic tank , 2003 .

[43]  E. Ona,et al.  Synthetic echograms generated from the relative frequency response , 2003 .

[44]  P. Petitgas,et al.  Consistency in the correlation of school parameters across years and stocks , 2003 .

[45]  Paul G. Fernandes,et al.  Acoustic applications in fisheries science: the ICES contribution , 2002 .

[46]  Larry A. Mayer,et al.  3D visualization for pelagic fisheries research and assessment , 2002 .

[47]  E. Ona,et al.  An operational system for processing and visualizing multi-frequency acoustic data , 2002 .

[48]  M. Barangé,et al.  Species identification of pelagic fish schools on the South African continental shelf using acoustic descriptors and ancillary information , 2001 .

[49]  David G. Reid.  Report on Echo Trace Classification , 2000 .

[50]  Pierre Fréon,et al.  From two dimensions to three: the use of multibeam sonar for a new approach in fisheries acoustics , 1999 .

[51]  Jacques Masse,et al.  Acoustic observations in the Bay of Biscay: Schooling, vertical distribution, species assemblages and behaviour , 1996 .

[52]  E. John Simmonds,et al.  Fisheries Acoustics , 1992, Fish & Fisheries Series.

[53]  K. Foote.  Calibration of acoustic instruments for fish density estimation : a practical guide , 1987 .

[54]  Pierre Freon,et al.  La variabilité des tailles individuelles à l'intérieur des cohortes et des bancs de poissons I : Observations et interprétation , 1984 .