A Network based Blockchain ecosystem for peer review publication

Blockchain as an emerging technology has transformed many traditional and conventional ecosystems and business models. Publication review system is one of the interesting subjects for transformation. The conventional models of publication review besides the urgent criticisms necessitates a transformation. This paper has investigated the most dominant shortcomings of literature review of publication review systems. Investigating the capabilities of Blockchain technology in the literature and its transformative capabilities, a network based Blockchain ecosystem is proposed. The ecosystem is providing a decentralized, transparent, and effective collaboration mechanisms for authors, reviewers, and other stakeholders in publication review processes. The main advantage of the ecosystem is committing the of all stakeholders and recognizing their contributions in a publication. Moreover, the ecosystem profits the stakeholders from the resulted reputation of the publication in future citations with its token model. The architecture of the proposed ecosystem supports the management of publication contents and sharing it for stakeholders. Moreover, it enables the configuration of smart contracts for governance of processes among stakeholders. It uses a token transaction Blockchain model to fulfill the token transactions. The capabilities and details of layers in the ecosystem has been discussed addressing the new paradigm of publication review ecosystem.

[1]  Alex Csiszar,et al.  Peer review: Troubled from the start , 2016, Nature.

[2]  Israa Abu-Elezz,et al.  The benefits and threats of blockchain technology in healthcare: A scoping review , 2020, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[3]  Omid Fatahi Valilai,et al.  Blockchain-based cloud manufacturing platforms: A novel idea for service composition in XaaS paradigm , 2021, PeerJ Comput. Sci..

[4]  Ayoub Bahnasse,et al.  Smart logistics: Study of the application of blockchain technology , 2019, EUSPN/ICTH.

[5]  Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva,et al.  Challenges to open peer review , 2019, Online Inf. Rev..

[6]  S. Nakamoto,et al.  Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System , 2008 .

[7]  Fei-Yue Wang,et al.  Towards blockchain-based intelligent transportation systems , 2016, 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[8]  Seunghwan Kim,et al.  Energy Prosumer Business Model Using Blockchain System to Ensure Transparency and Safety , 2017 .

[9]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Open Evaluation: A Vision for Entirely Transparent Post-Publication Peer Review and Rating for Science , 2012, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[10]  Zhiyu Chen,et al.  A blockchain-based eHealthcare system interoperating with WBANs , 2020, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[11]  Jay Lee,et al.  A blockchain enabled Cyber-Physical System architecture for Industry 4.0 manufacturing systems , 2019, Manufacturing Letters.

[12]  Jonathan P. Tennant,et al.  The state of the art in peer review , 2018, FEMS microbiology letters.

[13]  Omid Fatahi Valilai,et al.  Using blockchain technology to extend the vendor managed inventory for sustainability , 2021, Journal of Construction Materials.

[14]  D. Benos,et al.  The ups and downs of peer review. , 2007, Advances in physiology education.

[15]  JP Vergne,et al.  Decentralized vs. Distributed Organization: Blockchain, Machine Learning and the Future of the Digital Platform , 2020, Organization Theory.

[16]  Richard Walker,et al.  Emerging trends in peer review—a survey , 2015, Front. Neurosci..

[17]  A. Mavrogenis,et al.  The good, the bad and the rude peer-review , 2020, International Orthopaedics.

[18]  E. Irannezhad Is blockchain a solution for logistics and freight transportation problems? , 2020 .

[19]  Joseph E. Kasten,et al.  Engineering and Manufacturing on the Blockchain: A Systematic Review , 2020, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[20]  J. A. Teixeira da Silva,et al.  Open Access Mega-Journals: Quality, Economics and Post-publication Peer Review Infrastructure , 2019, Publishing Research Quarterly.

[21]  Gyanendra Prasad Joshi,et al.  Blockchain-Based Traceability and Visibility for Agricultural Products: A Decentralized Way of Ensuring Food Safety in India , 2020, Sustainability.

[22]  Mark Henderson,et al.  Problems with peer review , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[23]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[24]  Marc Pilkington,et al.  Can Blockchain Improve Healthcare Management? Consumer Medical Electronics and the IoMT , 2017 .

[25]  Lennart Ante Non-fungible token (NFT) markets on the Ethereum blockchain: temporal development, cointegration and interrelations , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[26]  Jacalyn Kelly,et al.  Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide , 2014, EJIFCC.

[27]  Kristin B. Cornelius Betraying Blockchain: Accountability, Transparency and Document Standards for Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) , 2021, Inf..

[28]  Mark Buitenhek Understanding and applying Blockchain technology in banking: Evolution or revolution? , 2016 .

[29]  Sanjay Misra,et al.  Transformative effects of IoT, Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence on cloud computing: Evolution, vision, trends and open challenges , 2019, Internet Things.

[30]  T. Comes,et al.  Leveraging Partnerships with Logistics Service Providers in Humanitarian Supply Chains by Blockchain-based Smart Contracts , 2019, IFAC-PapersOnLine.

[31]  Martin White,et al.  Internet of Things, Blockchain and Shared Economy Applications , 2016, EUSPN/ICTH.

[32]  Sarah Callaghan,et al.  Citation and Peer Review of Data: Moving Towards Formal Data Publication , 2011, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[33]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Blockchain for next generation services in banking and finance: cost, benefit, risk and opportunity analysis , 2020, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[34]  Zhiqi Shen,et al.  Blockchain and IoT based Food Traceability for Smart Agriculture , 2018, ICCSE'18.

[35]  Mahmud Hasan,et al.  A Case Study for Blockchain in Manufacturing: "FabRec": A Prototype for Peer-to-Peer Network of Manufacturing Nodes , 2018, ArXiv.

[36]  Ioannis Stamelos,et al.  Blockchain 3.0 Smart Contracts in E-Government 3.0 Applications , 2019, ArXiv.

[37]  Marko Hölbl,et al.  EduCTX: A Blockchain-Based Higher Education Credit Platform , 2017, IEEE Access.

[38]  Bodo M Stern,et al.  A proposal for the future of scientific publishing in the life sciences , 2019, PLoS biology.

[39]  Kemafor Ogan,et al.  Hybrid Blockchain Architecture for Cloud Manufacturing-as-a-service (CMaaS) Platforms with Improved Data Storage and Transaction Efficiency , 2021, Procedia Manufacturing.

[40]  Omid Fatahi Valilai,et al.  A novel cloud manufacturing service composition platform enabled by Blockchain technology , 2020, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[41]  Gerd J. Hahn,et al.  Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management: An Application Perspective , 2019, HICSS.

[42]  R. Spier The history of the peer-review process. , 2002, Trends in biotechnology.

[43]  K. Chalkias,et al.  Crypto Collectibles, Museum Funding and OpenGLAM: Challenges, Opportunities and the Potential of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) , 2021, Applied Sciences.

[44]  R. Lee Lyman,et al.  A Three-Decade History of the Duration of Peer Review , 2013 .

[45]  Roger Watson,et al.  Peer review and the publication process , 2016, Nursing open.

[46]  Faten Adel Alabdulwahhab Web 3.0: The Decentralized Web Blockchain networks and Protocol Innovation , 2018, 2018 1st International Conference on Computer Applications & Information Security (ICCAIS).

[47]  Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo,et al.  Blockchain in healthcare applications: Research challenges and opportunities , 2019, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[48]  John D Bowman,et al.  Predatory Publishing, Questionable Peer Review, and Fraudulent Conferences , 2014, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[49]  Asif Nawaz,et al.  BlockChain with IoT, an Emergent Routing Scheme for Smart Agriculture , 2020 .

[50]  Lorenzino Vaccari,et al.  Blockchain for digital government: An assessment of pioneering implementations in public services , 2019 .

[51]  Rok Vrabič,et al.  Distributed logistics platform based on Blockchain and IoT , 2019, Procedia CIRP.

[52]  Rachel Burley,et al.  Peer review in the 21st century , 2017, Inf. Serv. Use.

[53]  Andrea Baronchelli,et al.  Mapping the NFT revolution: market trends, trade networks, and visual features , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[54]  Jameela Al-Jaroodi,et al.  Applying Blockchain in Industry 4.0 Applications , 2019, 2019 IEEE 9th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC).

[55]  Iluminada Baturone,et al.  Secure Combination of IoT and Blockchain by Physically Binding IoT Devices to Smart Non-Fungible Tokens Using PUFs , 2021, Sensors.

[56]  C. Munro,et al.  Criticism and Judgment: A Critical Look at Scientific Peer Review. , 2019, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[57]  Fabio Della Valle,et al.  A Guidance for Blockchain-Based Digital Transition in Supply Chains , 2021, Applied Sciences.

[58]  Shiping Chen,et al.  Non-Fungible Token (NFT): Overview, Evaluation, Opportunities and Challenges , 2021, ArXiv.

[59]  Talha Mahboob Alam,et al.  A journey of WEB and Blockchain towards the Industry 4.0: An Overview , 2019, 2019 International Conference on Innovative Computing (ICIC).