Convergence Study of Variational Space-Time Coupled Least-Squares Frameworks in Simulation of Wave Propagation in Viscoelastic Medium

There are many novel applications of space-time decoupled least squares and Galerkin formulations that simulate wave propagation through different types of media. Numerical simulation of stress wave propagation through viscoelastic medium is commonly carried out using the space-time decoupled Galerkin weak form in site response problem, etc. In a recent investigation into accuracy of this formulation in simulating elastic wave propagation, it was shown that the diffusive and dispersive errors are greatly reduced when space-time coupled least squares formulation is used instead in variational form. This paper investigates convergence characteristics of both formulations. To this end, two test cases, which are site response and impact models for viscoelastic medium, are employed, one dominated by dispersive and the other by diffusive numerical error. Convergence studies reveal that, compared to the commonly used space-time decoupled Galerkin and the coupled least squares formulation has much lower numerical errors, higher rates of convergence, and ability to take far larger time increments in the evolution process. In solving such models, coefficient matrices would require updating after each time step, a process that can be very costly. However large time steps allowed by cLs are expected to be a significant feature in reducing the overall computational cost.

[1]  D. Q. Ngo,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Investigations on Flexural Behaviour of Prestressed Textile Reinforced Concrete Slabs , 2021 .

[2]  M. A. Saffarian,et al.  Highly accurate space-time coupled least-squares finite element framework in studying wave propagation , 2020, SN Applied Sciences.

[3]  Hao Wang,et al.  Prediction of Viscoelastic Pavement Responses under Moving Load and Nonuniform Tire Contact Stresses Using 2.5-D Finite Element Method , 2020 .

[4]  G. McMechan,et al.  Modeling the viscoelastic effects in P-waves with modified viscoacoustic wave propagation , 2019, GEOPHYSICS.

[5]  Jingyi Chen,et al.  Simulating Seismic Wave Propagation in Viscoelastic Media with an Irregular Free Surface , 2018, Pure and Applied Geophysics.

[6]  E. Kausel,et al.  Non-linear modeling of seismic isolation systems made of recycled tire-rubber , 2016 .

[7]  Kyriazis Pitilakis,et al.  Numerical investigation of the seismic response of RC buildings on soil replaced with rubber–sand mixtures , 2015 .

[8]  Martin van Driel,et al.  Optimized viscoelastic wave propagation for weakly dissipative media , 2014 .

[9]  M. A. Saffarian,et al.  Seismic response analysis of layered soils considering effect of surcharge mass using HFTD approach.Part I: basic formulation and linear HFTD , 2014 .

[10]  M. A. Saffarian,et al.  Seismic response analysis of layered soils considering effect of surcharge mass using HFTD approach.Part II: Nonlinear HFTD and numerical examples , 2014 .

[11]  H. Banks,et al.  High-order space-time finite element schemes for acoustic and viscodynamic wave equations with temporal decoupling , 2014, International journal for numerical methods in engineering.

[12]  E. Grasso Modelling visco-elastic seismic wave propagation : a fast-multipole boundary element method and its coupling with finite elements , 2012 .

[13]  Roberto Paolucci,et al.  A macro‐element model for non‐linear soil–shallow foundation–structure interaction under seismic loads: theoretical development and experimental validation on large scale tests , 2012 .

[14]  José Manuel Abete,et al.  Dynamics of an exponentially damped solid rod: Analytic solution and finite element formulations , 2012 .

[15]  Zach Liang,et al.  Structural Damping: Applications in Seismic Response Modification , 2011 .

[16]  Chang-Guk Sun,et al.  Assessment of site effects of a shallow and wide basin using geotechnical information-based spatial characterization , 2008 .

[17]  周建平,et al.  Strain analysis of nonlocal viscoelastic Kelvin bar in tension , 2008 .

[18]  J. Reddy,et al.  The k-Version of Finite Element Method for Initial Value Problems: Mathematical and Computational Framework , 2007 .

[19]  K. S. Surana,et al.  On p-Version Hierarchical Interpolation Functions for Higher-Order Continuity Finite Element Models , 2001, Int. J. Comput. Eng. Sci..

[20]  Dominik Schötzau,et al.  hp-discontinuous Galerkin time stepping for parabolic problems , 2001 .

[21]  Rainer Niekamp,et al.  Continuous and discontinuous Galerkin methods with finite elements in space and time for parallel computing of viscoelastic deformation , 2000 .

[22]  Karan S. Surana,et al.  A space–time coupled p‐version least‐squares finite element formulation for unsteady fluid dynamics problems , 1994 .

[23]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Space-time finite element methods for second-order hyperbolic equations , 1990 .

[24]  J. Rauch ON CONVERGENCE OF THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD FOR THE WAVE EQUATION , 1985 .

[25]  T. J.R. Hughes,et al.  ANALYSIS OF TRANSIENT ALGORITHMS WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO STABILITY BEHAVIOR. , 1983 .

[26]  O. C. Zienkiewicz A new look at the newmark, houbolt and other time stepping formulas. A weighted residual approach , 1977 .

[27]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics , 1977 .

[28]  John Argyris,et al.  Finite Elements in Time and Space , 1969, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[29]  R. Moreira,et al.  Viscoelastic Damping Technologies-Part I: Modeling and Finite Element Implementation ⋆ , 2010 .

[30]  Uǧur Dalli,et al.  Longitudinally vibrating elastic rods with locally and non-locally reacting viscous dampers , 2005 .

[31]  Lothar Gaul,et al.  The influence of damping on waves and vibrations , 1999 .

[32]  T. Hughes,et al.  Collocation, dissipation and [overshoot] for time integration schemes in structural dynamics , 1978 .