Linked data for libraries: benefits of a conceptual shift from library-specific record structures to RDF-based data models

Contemporary metadata principles and standards tended to result in document-centric rather than data-centric; human-readable rather than machine-processable metadata. In order for libraries to create and harness shareable, mashable and re-usable metadata, a conceptual shift can be achieved by adjusting current library models such as Resource Description and Access (RDA) and Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) to models based on Linked Data principles. In relation to technical formats, libraries can leapfrog to Linked Data technical formats such as the Resource Description Framework (RDF), without disrupting current library metadata operations. This paper provides six key recommendations for libraries and standards agencies. These include rising to the challenges and embracing the opportunities presented by current technological trends, adopting minimal requirements of Linked Data principles, developing ontologies, deciding on what needs to be retained from current library models, becoming part of the Linked Data cloud, and developing mixed-metadata (standards-based and socially-constructed) approaches. Finally, the paper concludes by identifying and discussing five major benefits of such metadata re-conceptualisation. The benefits include metadata openness and sharing, serendipitous discovery of information resources, identification of zeitgeist and emergent metadata, facet-based navigation and metadata enriched with links.

[1]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[2]  Marcia Lei Zeng,et al.  Navigating the Intersection of Library Bibliographic Data and Linked Music Information Sources: A Study of the Identification of Useful Metadata Elements for Interlinking , 2013 .

[3]  J. Rothenberg,et al.  Interoperability as a semantic cross-cutting concern , 2009 .

[4]  Adam Mathes,et al.  Folksonomies-Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata , 2004 .

[5]  David Mason,et al.  Building Library 3.0: Issues in Creating a Culture of Participation , 2010 .

[6]  Luciana Lazzeretti,et al.  Desperately seeking serendipity: Exploring the impact of country location on innovation in the wine industry , 2008 .

[7]  Nigel Shadbolt data.gov.uk - The Linked Data Revolution , 2010 .

[8]  Elinor G. Barber,et al.  The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity: A Study in Sociological Semantics and the Sociology of Science , 2004 .

[9]  Seymour Lubetzky Development of Cataloging Rules , 1953 .

[10]  Bruce E. Massis “Serendipitous” browsing versus library space , 2011 .

[11]  James Lappin,et al.  What will be the next records management orthodoxy , 2010 .

[12]  Ethan Zuckerman Desparately Seeking Serendipity , 2011, CHI 2011.

[13]  Thomas Gruber,et al.  Ontology of Folksonomy: A Mash-Up of Apples and Oranges , 2007, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[14]  A. Chris,et al.  Long Tail: How Endless Choice is Creating Unlimited Demand, London: Random House. , 1996 .

[15]  C. Anderson,et al.  Free : how today's smartest businesses profit by giving something for nothing , 2010 .

[16]  James A. Hendler,et al.  The Semantic Web: A new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities , 2001 .

[17]  Marie-France Plassard,et al.  Functional requirements for bibliographic records : final report , 2013 .

[18]  S. Brand The Clock Of The Long Now: Time And Responsibility , 1999 .

[19]  Dean Allemang,et al.  Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist - Effective Modeling in RDFS and OWL, Second Edition , 2011 .

[20]  Mikael Nilsson,et al.  From Interoperability to Harmonization in Metadata Standardization: Designing an Evolvable Framework for Metadata Harmonization , 2010 .

[21]  N. F. Noy,et al.  Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology , 2001 .

[22]  Danny Ayers,et al.  Semantic Marc, MARC21 and The Semantic Web , 2008, LDOW.

[23]  Karen Coyle Chapter 1: Library Data in a Modern Context , 2010 .

[24]  M. Stoskopf Observation and cogitation: how serendipity provides the building blocks of scientific discovery. , 2005, ILAR journal.

[25]  Gordon Dunsire The semantic web and expert metadata: pull apart then bring together , 2009 .

[26]  Gregory J. E. Rawlins Glut: Mastering Information Through the Ages , 2010 .

[27]  T. D. Wilson Review of: Morville, Peter. Ambient findability. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly, 2005 , 2006, Inf. Res..

[28]  James A. Hendler,et al.  The Semantic Web" in Scientific American , 2001 .

[29]  Making Science by Serendipity. A review of Robert K. Merton and Elinor Barber's The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity , 2008 .

[30]  Sarantos Kapidakis,et al.  Preservation Metadata , 2008 .

[31]  Les Carr,et al.  A Research Agenda for Linked Closed Data , 2011 .

[32]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[33]  Dennis Nicholson The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization , 2003 .

[34]  Paul Miller Web 2.0: Building the New Library , 2005 .

[35]  Gordon Dunsire Representing the FR Family in the Semantic Web , 2012 .

[36]  Stewart Brand,et al.  How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They're Built , 1997 .

[37]  Michael J. Day,et al.  Integrating Metadata Schema Registries with Digital Preservation Systems to Support Interoperability: a Proposal , 2003, Dublin Core Conference.

[38]  Antoine Isaac,et al.  data.europeana.eu: The Europeana Linked Open Data Pilot , 2011, Dublin Core Conference.

[39]  David Weinberger,et al.  Tagging and Why it Matters , 2005 .

[40]  D. Weinberger Everything Is Miscellaneous: The Power of the New Digital Disorder , 2007 .

[41]  Bryan N. Alexander Web 2.0: A New Wave of Innovation for Teaching and Learning? , 2006 .

[42]  Michael Day,et al.  Preservation metadata initiatives: practicality, sustainability, and interoperability , 2004 .

[43]  Gordon Dunsire UNIMARC, RDA and the Semantic Web , 2010 .

[44]  William Denton,et al.  FRBR and the History of Cataloging , 2007 .

[45]  Eric Miller Presenter,et al.  Linked Data and Libraries , 2011 .

[46]  Michael Day,et al.  DCC Digital Curation Manual: Instalment on Metadata , 2005 .

[47]  Getaneh Alemu,et al.  Towards a conceptual framework for user‐driven semantic metadata interoperability in digital libraries: A social constructivist approach , 2012 .

[48]  chris-anderson The Long Tail: How Endless Choice is Creating Unlimited Demand , 2007 .

[49]  Leonard R. Rappa,et al.  Desperately Seeking Serendipity: The Past, Present, and Future of Antidepressant Therapy , 2001 .

[50]  Sun Yuan,et al.  The Metadata Architecture , 1999 .

[51]  D. Grant Campbell,et al.  From Pace Layering to Resilience Theory: The Complex Implications of Tagging for Information Architecture , 2006 .

[52]  Sally H. McCallum,et al.  New Metadata Standards for Digital Resources: MODS and METS , 2003 .

[53]  Mirna Willer,et al.  Standard library metadata models and structures for the Semantic Web , 2011 .

[54]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  The Semantic Web: The Roles of XML and RDF , 2000, IEEE Internet Comput..

[55]  Kim H. Veltman,et al.  Syntactic and semantic interoperability: New approaches to knowledge and the semantic web , 2001 .

[56]  Helen K. R. Williams Linked data and libraries , 2010 .

[57]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Linked data , 2020, Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist.

[58]  D. Weinberger Too Big to Know: Rethinking Knowledge Now That the Facts Aren't the Facts, Experts Are Everywhere, and the Smartest Person in the Room Is the Room , 2012 .

[59]  Wendy Hall,et al.  The Semantic Web Revisited , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[60]  Don Tapscott,et al.  Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything , 2006 .

[61]  Les Carr,et al.  A research agenda for linked closed data (vision paper) , 2011 .

[62]  Antoine Isaac,et al.  Library Linked Data Incubator Group Final Report , 2011 .

[63]  Sheila Bair Linked Data—The Right Time? , 2013 .

[64]  Sharon Poggenpohl,et al.  The Laws of Simplicity: Design, Technology, Business, Life , 2007 .

[65]  Nigel Ford,et al.  Serendipity and information seeking: an empirical study , 2003, J. Documentation.

[66]  Carl Lagoze,et al.  Lost Identity: The Assimilation Of Digital Libraries Into The Web , 2010 .

[67]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Collective knowledge systems: Where the Social Web meets the Semantic Web , 2008, J. Web Semant..

[68]  Karen Coyle,et al.  Resource Description and Access (RDA): Cataloging Rules for the 20th Century , 2007 .

[69]  Gordon Dunsire UNIMARÇ RDA and the Semantic Vfeb , 2010 .

[70]  Michael Day,et al.  Resource discovery, interoperability and digital preservation: some aspects of current metadata research and development , 1999 .