Presentation, Clinical Profile, and Prognosis of Young Patients With Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA): Results From the VIRGO Study

Background We compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes of young patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) versus obstructive disease (myocardial infarction due to coronary artery disease [MI‐CAD]) and among patients with MINOCA by sex and subtype. Methods and Results Between 2008 and 2012, VIRGO (Variation in Recovery: Role of Gender on Outcomes of Young AMI Patients) prospectively enrolled acute myocardial infarction patients aged 18 to 55 years in 103 hospitals at a 2:1 ratio of women to men. Using an angiographically driven taxonomy, we defined patients as having MI‐CAD if there was revascularization or plaque ≥50% and as having MINOCA if there was <50% obstruction or a nonplaque mechanism. Patients who did not have an angiogram or who received thrombolytics before an angiogram were excluded. Outcomes included 1‐ and 12‐month mortality and functional (Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ]) and psychosocial status. Of 2690 patients undergoing angiography, 2374 (88.4%) had MI‐CAD, 299 (11.1%) had MINOCA, and 17 (0.6%) remained unclassified. Women had 5 times higher odds of having MINOCA than men (14.9% versus 3.5%; odds ratio: 4.84; 95% confidence interval, 3.29–7.13). MINOCA patients were more likely to be without traditional cardiac risk factors (8.7% versus 1.3%; P<0.001) but more predisposed to hypercoaguable states than MI‐CAD patients (3.0% versus 1.3%; P=0.036). Women with MI‐CAD were more likely than those with MINOCA to be menopausal (55.2% versus 41.2%; P<0.001) or to have a history of gestational diabetes mellitus (16.8% versus 11.0%; P=0.028). The MINOCA mechanisms varied: a nonplaque mechanism was identified for 75 patients (25.1%), and their clinical profiles and management also varied. One‐ and 12‐month mortality with MINOCA and MI‐CAD was similar (1‐month: 1.1% and 1.7% [P=0.43]; 12‐month: 0.6% and 2.3% [P=0.68], respectively), as was adjusted 12‐month SAQ quality of life (76.5 versus 73.5, respectively; P=0.06). Conclusions Young patients with MINOCA were more likely women, had a heterogeneous mechanistic profile, and had clinical outcomes that were comparable to those of MI‐CAD patients. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00597922.

[1]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Sex Differences in the Presentation and Perception of Symptoms Among Young Patients With Myocardial Infarction: Evidence from the VIRGO Study (Variation in Recovery Role of Gender on Outcomes of Young AMI Patients) , 2018, Circulation.

[2]  G. Niccoli,et al.  Patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries: safety and prognostic relevance of invasive coronary provocative tests , 2017, European heart journal.

[3]  Brian A. King,et al.  Current Cigarette Smoking Among Adults — United States, 2016 , 2015, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[4]  P. Mommersteeg Correction on "Impaired health status, psychological distress, and personality in women and men with nonobstructive coronary artery disease. Sex and Gender Differences: The TWIST (Tweesteden Mild Stenosis) Study (vol 10, e003387, 2017)" , 2017 .

[5]  R. Tavella,et al.  Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA): The Past, Present, and Future Management , 2017, Circulation.

[6]  B. Lindahl,et al.  Medical Therapy for Secondary Prevention and Long-Term Outcome in Patients With Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease , 2017, Circulation.

[7]  J. Ferrières,et al.  Editor’s Choice-Medically managed patients with non–ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction have heterogeneous outcomes, based on performance of angiography and extent of coronary artery disease , 2017, European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care.

[8]  J. Denollet,et al.  Impaired Health Status, Psychological Distress, and Personality in Women and Men With Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease , 2017, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[9]  D. Atar,et al.  ESC working group position paper on myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries. , 2016, European heart journal.

[10]  J. Ferrières,et al.  β blockers and mortality after myocardial infarction in patients without heart failure: multicentre prospective cohort study , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[11]  Jiaquan Xu,et al.  Deaths: Final Data for 2014. , 2016, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[12]  G. Niccoli,et al.  Coronary microvascular obstruction in acute myocardial infarction. , 2016, European heart journal.

[13]  J. Beltrame,et al.  The importance of evaluating patients with MINOCA (myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries). , 2015, International journal of cardiology.

[14]  C. Gross,et al.  The Variation in Recovery: Role of Gender on Outcomes of Young AMI Patients (VIRGO) Classification System A Taxonomy for Young Women With Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2015, Circulation.

[15]  M. Carroll,et al.  Hypertension Prevalence and Control Among Adults: United States, 2011-2014. , 2015, NCHS data brief.

[16]  R. Dreyer,et al.  Systematic Review of Patients Presenting With Suspected Myocardial Infarction and Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries , 2015, Circulation.

[17]  G. Niccoli,et al.  Acute myocardial infarction with no obstructive coronary atherosclerosis: mechanisms and management. , 2015, European heart journal.

[18]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Nonobstructive coronary artery disease and risk of myocardial infarction. , 2014, JAMA.

[19]  S. Sirmans,et al.  Epidemiology and Comorbidities of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in an Indigent Population , 2014, Journal of Investigative Medicine.

[20]  H. White,et al.  Prognosis of Patients With Non–ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Propensity-Matched Analysis From the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy Trial , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[21]  F. Crea,et al.  Acute Coronary Syndromes Without Obstructive Coronary Atherosclerosis: The Tiles of a Complex Puzzle , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[22]  J. Es,et al.  Evidence of myocardial scarring and microvascular obstruction on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in a series of patients presenting with myocardial infarction without obstructed coronary arteries , 2014, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[23]  C. Ananth,et al.  Pre-eclampsia rates in the United States, 1980-2010: age-period-cohort analysis , 2013, BMJ.

[24]  J. Beltrame Assessing patients with myocardial infarction and nonobstructed coronary arteries (MINOCA) , 2013, Journal of internal medicine.

[25]  J. Spertus,et al.  Perceived stress in myocardial infarction: long-term mortality and health status outcomes. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  L. Mitchell Use of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with coronary artery spasm as the apparent cause of spontaneous life-threatening ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation: crossing the spasm sudden death chasm. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  S. Curtin,et al.  Estimated pregnancy rates and rates of pregnancy outcomes for the United States, 1990-2008. , 2012, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[28]  W. Rathmann,et al.  Age at menarche is associated with prediabetes and diabetes in women (aged 32–81 years) from the general population: the KORA F4 Study , 2012, Diabetologia.

[29]  W. Rathmann,et al.  Age at Menarche and Its Association with the Metabolic Syndrome and Its Components: Results from the KORA F4 Study , 2011, PloS one.

[30]  R. Kaaks,et al.  Pregnancy loss and risk of cardiovascular disease: a prospective population-based cohort study (EPIC-Heidelberg) , 2010, Heart.

[31]  J. Rumsfeld,et al.  Utilization of Secondary Prevention Therapies in Patients With Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease Identified During Cardiac Catheterization: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Cath-PCI Registry , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[32]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Variation in Recovery: Role of Gender on Outcomes of Young AMI Patients (VIRGO) Study Design , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[33]  Pamela S Douglas,et al.  Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[34]  L. Newby,et al.  Characterization and outcomes of women and men with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and nonobstructive coronary artery disease: results from the Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes with Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CRU , 2009, American heart journal.

[35]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Economic Impact of Angina After an Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the MERLIN-TIMI 36 Trial , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[36]  E. Vittinghoff,et al.  Depressive symptoms, health behaviors, and risk of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary heart disease. , 2008, JAMA.

[37]  J. Redfern,et al.  Low utilisation of cardiovascular risk reducing therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes and non-obstructive coronary artery disease. , 2008, International journal of cardiology.

[38]  R. de Caterina,et al.  Myocardial infarction with normal coronary arteries: a conundrum with multiple aetiologies and variable prognosis: an update , 2007, Journal of internal medicine.

[39]  B. Gersh,et al.  Microcirculatory dysfunction in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: cause, consequence, or both? , 2007, European heart journal.

[40]  S. Karumanchi,et al.  Endothelial Dysfunction: A Link Among Preeclampsia, Recurrent Pregnancy Loss, and Future Cardiovascular Events? , 2007, Hypertension.

[41]  Manesh R. Patel,et al.  Prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and insignificant coronary artery disease: results from the Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CR , 2006, American heart journal.

[42]  R. Bugiardini,et al.  Unanswered questions for management of acute coronary syndrome: risk stratification of patients with minimal disease or normal findings on coronary angiography. , 2006, Archives of internal medicine.

[43]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Depressive symptoms after acute myocardial infarction: evidence for highest rates in younger women. , 2006, Archives of internal medicine.

[44]  C Noel Bairey Merz,et al.  Angina with "normal" coronary arteries. , 2005 .

[45]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Prognostic implications of elevated troponin in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome but no critical epicardial coronary disease: a TACTICS-TIMI-18 substudy. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[46]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Anginal symptoms consistently predict total mortality among outpatients with coronary artery disease. , 2003, American heart journal.

[47]  J. Rumsfeld,et al.  Depressive symptoms and health-related quality of life: the Heart and Soul Study. , 2003, JAMA.

[48]  R. Spitzer,et al.  The PHQ-9: A new depression diagnostic and severity measure , 2002 .

[49]  J. Spertus,et al.  Health Status Predicts Long-Term Outcome in Outpatients With Coronary Disease , 2002, Circulation.

[50]  Helen Brown,et al.  Applied Mixed Models in Medicine , 2000, Technometrics.

[51]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Clinical and therapeutic profile of patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes who do not have significant coronary artery disease.The Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy (PURSUIT) Trial Investigators. , 2000, Circulation.

[52]  Harlan M. Krumholz,et al.  Sex-Based Differences in Early Mortality after Myocardial Infarction , 1999 .

[53]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Sex-based differences in early mortality after myocardial infarction. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Participants. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[54]  R A Deyo,et al.  Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[55]  J. Spertus,et al.  Monitoring the quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. , 1994, The American journal of cardiology.

[56]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Clinical and arteriographic characterization of patients with unstable angina without critical coronary arterial narrowing (from the TIMI-IIIA Trial). , 1994, The American journal of cardiology.

[57]  E. Falk Unstable angina with fatal outcome: dynamic coronary thrombosis leading to infarction and/or sudden death. Autopsy evidence of recurrent mural thrombosis with peripheral embolization culminating in total vascular occlusion. , 1985, Circulation.

[58]  T. Kamarck,et al.  A global measure of perceived stress. , 1983, Journal of health and social behavior.

[59]  M S Golden,et al.  Prevalence of total coronary occlusion during the early hours of transmural myocardial infarction. , 1980, The New England journal of medicine.