Quantitative model of the driver's reaction time during daytime fog – application to a head up display-based advanced driver assistance system

Road accidents because of fog are relatively rare but their severity is greater and the risk of pile-up is higher. However, processing the images grabbed by cameras embedded in the vehicles can restore some visibility. Tarel et al. (2012) proposed to implement head up displays (HUD) to help drivers anticipate potential collisions by displaying dehazed images of the road scene. In the present study, three experiments have been designed to quantify the expected gain of such a system in terms of the driver's reaction time (RT). The first experiment compares the RT with and without dehazing, giving quantitative evidence that such an advanced driving assistance system (ADAS) may improve road safety. Then, based on a modified Pieron's law, a quantitative model is proposed, linking the RT to the target visibility (V t), which can be computed from onboard camera images. Two additional experiments have been conducted, giving evidence that the proposed RT model, computed from V t, is robust with respect to contextual cues, to contrast polarity and to population sample. The authors finally propose to use this predictive model to switch on/off the proposed HUD-based ADAS. Language: en

[1]  Zehang Sun,et al.  On-road vehicle detection: a review , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  Jean-Philippe Tarel,et al.  Mitigation of Visibility Loss for Advanced Camera-Based Driver Assistance , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[3]  Jean-Philippe Tarel,et al.  Vision Enhancement in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Fog , 2012, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[4]  Anaïs Mayeur,et al.  Effects of the viewing context on target detection. Implications for road lighting design. , 2010, Applied ergonomics.

[5]  Jean-Philippe Tarel,et al.  Automatic fog detection and estimation of visibility distance through use of an onboard camera , 2006, Machine Vision and Applications.

[6]  K Rumar,et al.  The basic driver error: late detection. , 1990, Ergonomics.

[7]  W. Adrian Visibility Levels under Night-time Driving Conditions , 1987 .

[8]  R. Snowden,et al.  Speed perception fogs up as visibility drops , 1998, Nature.

[9]  V. Cavallo,et al.  La surestimation de la distance intervéhiculaire dans le brouillard , 2000 .

[10]  H. Hecht,et al.  Luminance and contrast in visual perception of time to collision , 2013, Vision Research.

[11]  R. Mansfield,et al.  Latency functions in human vision. , 1973, Vision research.

[12]  W. Adrian,et al.  Visibility of targets: Model for calculation , 1989 .

[13]  H R BLACKWELL,et al.  Contrast thresholds of the human eye. , 1946, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[14]  H. Piéron,et al.  II. Recherches sur les lois de variation des temps de latence sensorielle en fonction des intensités excitatrices , 1913 .