Design Science and Organization Development Interventions Aligning Business and Humanistic Values

This article discusses a design science approach to organizational development (OD) resulting in some new perspectives about how OD interventions might support more effective organizational change. These relate to the way in which the formal organization is redesigned, the way this design is translated by the members of the organization into their own roles and routines, and the way in which subsequent organizational learning produces the intended performance improvement. The background, nature, and characteristics of design science and design science research are discussed, and using a design science perspective, a process model of planned change projects is presented. Drawing on a case in planned change, it is argued that a design science perspective can provide a powerful combination of the original strengths of OD in human behavior and planned change based on humanistic values on one hand and design competencies involving both humanistic and business values on the other.

[1]  Ian D. Watson,et al.  Applying case-based reasoning - techniques for the enterprise systems , 1997 .

[2]  J. Collins.  Good to great , 2001, The Game Changer.

[3]  G. Robert,et al.  Toward More User-Centric OD , 2007 .

[4]  W. Burke,et al.  Introduction: Is OD in Crisis? , 2004 .

[5]  Assessing the Field of Organization Development , 2004 .

[6]  D. Schoen.  The Reflective Practitioner , 1983 .

[7]  W. French,et al.  Organization development : behavioral science interventions for organization improvement , 1999 .

[8]  Joan Ernst van Aken,et al.  Valid knowledge for the professional design of large and complex design processes , 2005 .

[9]  Michael Hammer,et al.  Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate , 1990 .

[10]  W. Warner Burke.  The new agenda for organization development , 1997 .

[11]  Roy J. Lewicki,et al.  Ideas in Currency and OD Practice , 2004 .

[12]  K. Lewin.  Field theory in social science , 1951 .

[13]  L. Greiner,et al.  Wanted OD More Alive Than Dead , 2004 .

[14]  Donald R. Cooper,et al.  Business Research Methods , 1980 .

[15]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  Introduction to operations research , 1957 .

[16]  M. Hammer,et al.  REENGINEERING THE CORPORATION: A MANIFESTO FOR BUSINESS REVOLUTION , 1995 .

[17]  C. West Churchman,et al.  The Systems Approach , 1979 .

[18]  P. Senge.  The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[19]  Malcolm Higgs,et al.  Building change leadership capability: ‘The quest for change competence’ , 2000 .

[20]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  Fundamentals of operations research , 1968 .

[21]  J. Aken.  Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules , 2004 .

[22]  David Hillel Gelernter.  Machine Beauty: Elegance And The Heart Of Technology , 1998 .

[23]  N. Tichy.  Managing strategic change: Technical, political, and cultural dynamics , 1985 .

[24]  Eric Trist,et al.  The Social Engagement of Social Science, Volume 2: A Tavistock Anthology--The Socio-Technical Perspective , 1993 .

[25]  N. Nohria,et al.  Cracking the code of change. , 2000, Harvard business review.

[26]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[27]  Richard Beckhard,et al.  Organization Development: Strategies and Models , 1969 .

[28]  Christopher G. Worley,et al.  Reflections on the Future of Organization Development , 2003 .

[29]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizational change and development. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[30]  Jean M. Bartunek,et al.  What a Design Approach Offers to Organization Development , 2007 .

[31]  R. W. Boss.  Organization development in health care , 1989 .

[32]  J. Aken.  Management Research as a Design Science: Articulating the Research Products of Mode 2 Knowledge Production in Management , 2005 .

[33]  James D. Thompson.  On Building an Administrative Science , 1956 .

[34]  van Fm Frans Eijnatten.  The paradigm that changed the work place , 1995 .

[35]  J. Alexander,et al.  Images of Organization , 1988 .

[36]  Robert R. Blake.  Change by design , 1989 .

[37]  A. Georges L. Romme,et al.  Making a Difference: Organization as Design , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[38]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[39]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .