Operating point selection for primary and secondary users in cognitive radio networks

This paper addresses the problem of opportunistic access of secondary users to licensed spectrum in cognitive radio networks. In order to avoid interference to the licensed primary users, efficient spectrum detection methods need to be developed. For this purpose, in recent years several sensing techniques have been proposed to monitor and regulate the spectrum access to the shared spectrum resources. However, spectrum sensing may be affected by errors in the form of missed-detections (i.e., an occupied spectrum is erroneously detected as free) or false-alarms (i.e., a free spectrum is erroneously detected as occupied). These two magnitudes pose a tradeoff on the design of the spectrum sensing mechanisms meaning that low missed-detection can only be achieved at the expense of high false-alarm and vice versa. Thus, the network designers should adaptively tune the sensing techniques such that the highest perceived Quality of Service (QoS) is achieved by both primary and secondary users. In this paper, a framework is introduced for determining the sensing operating points. Also the definition of Grade-of-Service (GoS) metrics is adopted to the case of primary/secondary users spectrum sharing. It is shown that the operating points of the sensing mechanisms can be easily adjusted according to the current traffic load of both primary and secondary users so that the perceived GoS is maximized. In addition, the Erlang Capacity of the spectrum sharing system for both primary and secondary users is also evaluated considering the effects of erroneous sensing.

[1]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  On the Energy Detection of Unknown Signals Over Fading Channels , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[2]  Ekram Hossain,et al.  Radio Resource Management in Wireless Networks , .

[3]  Huang Hai,et al.  Dynamic Channel Allocation Scheme for Hybrid Cognitive Network , 2007, 2007 International Workshop on Anti-Counterfeiting, Security and Identification (ASID).

[4]  Ananthram Swami,et al.  Decentralized cognitive MAC for opportunistic spectrum access in ad hoc networks: A POMDP framework , 2007, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[5]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[6]  Yong Huat Chew,et al.  On the Grade-of-Services in the Sharing of Radio Spectrum , 2007, 2007 2nd International Conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks and Communications.

[7]  Jon M. Peha,et al.  Providing secondary access to licensed spectrum through coordination , 2008, Wirel. Networks.

[8]  Xiaorong Zhu,et al.  Analysis of Cognitive Radio Spectrum Access with Optimal Channel Reservation , 2007, IEEE Communications Letters.

[9]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Data Networks , 1986 .

[10]  Brian M. Sadler,et al.  Optimal Dynamic Spectrum Access via Periodic Channel Sensing , 2007, 2007 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[11]  Brian L. Mark,et al.  An Analytical Performance Model of Opportunistic Spectrum Access in a Military Environment , 2008, 2008 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[12]  Debasis Mitra,et al.  Erlang capacity and uniform approximations for shared unbuffered resources , 1994, TNET.

[13]  Oriol Sallent,et al.  A novel on-demand cognitive pilot channel enabling dynamic spectrum allocation , 2007, 2007 2nd IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks.

[14]  Beibei Wang,et al.  Primary-Prioritized Markov Approach for Dynamic Spectrum Access , 2007, 2007 2nd IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks.

[15]  R.W. Brodersen,et al.  Spectrum Sensing Measurements of Pilot, Energy, and Collaborative Detection , 2006, MILCOM 2006 - 2006 IEEE Military Communications conference.

[16]  Brian M. Sadler,et al.  A Survey of Dynamic Spectrum Access , 2007, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[17]  Rajarathnam Chandramouli,et al.  Dynamic spectrum access in open spectrum wireless networks , 2006, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[18]  Yonghong Zeng,et al.  Sensing-Throughput Tradeoff for Cognitive Radio Networks , 2008, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun..

[19]  Ying-Chang Liang,et al.  Dynamic Spectrum Access with Imperfect Sensing in Open Spectrum Wireless Networks , 2008, 2008 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[20]  M. Raspopovic,et al.  Finite Population Model for Performance Evaluation Between Narrowband and Wideband Users in the Shared Radio Spectrum , 2007, 2007 2nd IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks.

[21]  A. Ghasemi,et al.  Collaborative spectrum sensing for opportunistic access in fading environments , 2005, First IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2005. DySPAN 2005..

[22]  Milind M. Buddhikot,et al.  DIMSUMnet: new directions in wireless networking using coordinated dynamic spectrum , 2005, Sixth IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless Mobile and Multimedia Networks.

[23]  R.W. Brodersen,et al.  Implementation issues in spectrum sensing for cognitive radios , 2004, Conference Record of the Thirty-Eighth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2004..

[24]  Sai Shankar Nandagopalan,et al.  Sensing-based opportunistic channel access , 2006, Mob. Networks Appl..

[25]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  NeXt generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey , 2006, Comput. Networks.

[26]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Optimal spectrum sensing framework for cognitive radio networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.