Defaults and Normality in Causal Structures

A serious defect with the Halpern-Pearl (HP) definition of causality is repaired by combining a theory of causality with a theory of defaults. In addition, it is shown that (despite a claim to the contrary) a cause according to the HP condition need not be a single conjunct. A definition of causality motivated by Wright's NESS test is shown to always hold for a single conjunct. Moreover, conditions that hold for all the examples considered by HP are given that guarantee that causality according to (this version) of the NESS test is equivalent to the HP definition.

[1]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Possibilistic Logic, Preferential Models, Non-monotonicity and Related Issues , 1991, IJCAI.

[2]  Li Sheng-mei,et al.  On the Structure of "秀才秀才,错字布袋 , 2003 .

[3]  R. W. Wright.  Causation, Responsibility, Risk, Probability, Naked Statistics, and Proof: Pruning the Bramble Bush by Clarifying the Concepts, translated into Italian by Federico Stella , 1988 .

[4]  J. Pearl,et al.  Clarifying the Usage of Structural Models for Commonsense Causal Reasoning , 2003 .

[5]  Ned Hall.  Two Concepts of Causation , 2001 .

[6]  E. W. Adams,et al.  The logic of conditionals , 1975 .

[7]  Ned Hall,et al.  Causation and counterfactuals , 2004 .

[8]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic Semantics for Nonmonotonic Reasoning: A Survey , 1989, KR.

[9]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives , 1986 .

[10]  Joseph Y. Halpern,et al.  Causes and explanations: A structural-model approach , 2000 .

[11]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Preferential Models and Cumulative Logics , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[12]  Eric Hiddleston,et al.  Causal Powers , 2005, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[13]  Wolfgang Spohn,et al.  Ordinal Conditional Functions: A Dynamic Theory of Epistemic States , 1988 .

[14]  J. Mackie,et al.  I . CAUSES AND CONDITIONS , 2008 .

[15]  Thomas Lukasiewicz,et al.  Complexity results for structure-based causality , 2001, Artif. Intell..

[16]  Christopher Hitchcock,et al.  Structural equations and causation: six counterexamples , 2009 .

[17]  Fangzhen Lin,et al.  Embracing Causality in Specifying the Indirect Effects of Actions , 1995, IJCAI.

[18]  Eric Neufeld,et al.  The structural model interpretation of the NESS test , 2004, NMR.

[19]  J. Pearl.  Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[20]  D. Lewis.  Causation as Influence , 2000 .

[21]  Joseph Y. Halpern,et al.  Causes and Explanations: A Structural-Model Approach. Part I: Causes , 2000, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[22]  Joseph Y. Halpern.  Axiomatizing Causal Reasoning , 1998, UAI.

[23]  Hector Geffner,et al.  High-probabilities, model-preference and default arguments , 1992, Minds and Machines.

[24]  J. Bennett,et al.  Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding , 2010 .

[25]  Fangzhen Lin,et al.  Embracing Causality in Specifying the Indeterminate Effects of Actions , 1996, AAAI/IAAI, Vol. 1.

[26]  Christopher R. Hitchcock.  Prevention, Preemption, and the Principle of Sufficient Reason , 2007 .

[27]  T. Troward.  Causes and conditions. , 1919 .

[28]  R. W. Wright,et al.  Once More into the Bramble Bush: Duty, Causal Contribution, and the Extent of Legal Responsibility , 2001 .

[29]  Alex M. Andrew,et al.  Knowledge in Action: Logical Foundations for Specifying and Implementing Dynamical Systems , 2002 .

[30]  Moisés Goldszmidt,et al.  Rank-based Systems: A Simple Approach to Belief Revision, Belief Update, and Reasoning about Evidence and Actions , 1992, KR.

[31]  G. Williams.  Causation in the Law , 1961, The Cambridge Law Journal.

[32]  Ned Hall.  Structural equations and causation , 2007 .

[33]  Eric Neufeld,et al.  On the Structure Model Interpretation of Wright's NESS Test , 2003, Canadian Conference on AI.

[34]  R. W. Wright,et al.  Causation in Tort Law , 1985 .

[35]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  A semantical approach to nonmonotonic logics , 1987, LICS 1987.