Pit Latrine Emptying Behavior and Demand for Sanitation Services in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania

Pit latrines are the main form of sanitation in unplanned areas in many rapidly growing developing cities. Understanding demand for pit latrine fecal sludge management (FSM) services in these communities is important for designing demand-responsive sanitation services and policies to improve public health. We examine latrine emptying knowledge, attitudes, behavior, trends and rates of safe/unsafe emptying, and measure demand for a new hygienic latrine emptying service in unplanned communities in Dar Es Salaam (Dar), Tanzania, using data from a cross-sectional survey at 662 residential properties in 35 unplanned sub-wards across Dar, where 97% had pit latrines. A picture emerges of expensive and poor FSM service options for latrine owners, resulting in widespread fecal sludge exposure that is likely to increase unless addressed. Households delay emptying as long as possible, use full pits beyond what is safe, face high costs even for unhygienic emptying, and resort to unsafe practices like ‘flooding out’. We measured strong interest in and willingness to pay (WTP) for the new pit emptying service at 96% of residences; 57% were WTP ≥U.S. $17 to remove ≥200 L of sludge. Emerging policy recommendations for safe FSM in unplanned urban communities in Dar and elsewhere are discussed.

[1]  S. Huttly,et al.  The role of conceptual frameworks in epidemiological analysis: a hierarchical approach. , 1997, International journal of epidemiology.

[2]  P. Ferguson,et al.  Is Paris France , 2000 .

[3]  A. Tsing The Global Situation , 2000, Schools of Thought.

[4]  Marc Jeuland,et al.  URBAN EXCRETA MANAGEMENT - SITUATION, CHALLENGES, AND PROMISING SOLUTIONS , 2003 .

[5]  L. Strande The Global Situation , 2014 .

[6]  L. Strande,et al.  Characterization of faecal sludge during dry and rainy seasons in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso , 2013 .

[7]  J. B. Gning,et al.  value proposition : Resource recovery from faecal sludge — Can it be he driver for improved sanitation ? , 2014 .

[8]  Marion W. Jenkins,et al.  Beyond 'improved' towards 'safe and sustainable' urban sanitation: assessing the design, management and functionality of sanitation in poor communities of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania , 2014 .

[9]  Ousmane Sow,et al.  Capital and Operating Costs of Full-Scale Fecal Sludge Management and Wastewater Treatment Systems in Dakar, Senegal , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Aftab Opel,et al.  Inefficient technology or misperceived demand: the failure of Vacutug-based pit-emptying services in Bangladesh , 2013 .

[11]  A. Sajise,et al.  Willingness to pay for sanitation services in Dagupan City, Philippines , 2013 .

[12]  Franklin Obeng-Odoom,et al.  The State of African Cities 2014 , 2016 .

[13]  Steven Sugden The importance of understanding the market when designing pit-emptying devices , 2013 .

[14]  Marion W. Jenkins,et al.  Behavioral indicators of household decision-making and demand for sanitation and potential gains from social marketing in Ghana. , 2007, Social science & medicine.

[15]  D. Koné,et al.  Making urban excreta and wastewater management contribute to cities' economic development: a paradigm shift , 2010 .

[16]  Financial Transfers and Responsibility in Faecal Sludge Management Chains , 2014 .

[17]  Markus Starkl,et al.  Evaluation of Community and Household Based Sanitation Systems in Ethekwini Municipality, South Africa: Lessons Learned and Recommendations , 2010 .

[18]  Mansoor Ali,et al.  A Critical Review of Technologies for Pit Latrine Emptying in Developing Countries , 2011 .