On Reference Point Free Weighted Hypervolume Indicators based on Desirability Functions and their Probabilistic Interpretation

Abstract The so-called a posteriori approach to optimization with multiple conflicting objective functions is to compute or approximate a Pareto front of solutions. In case of continuous objective functions a finite approximation to this set can be computed. Indicator-based multiobjective optimization algorithms compute solution sets that are optimal with respect to some quality measure on sets, such as the commonly used hypervolume indicator (HI). The HI measures the size of the space that is dominated by a given set of solutions. It has many favorable monotonicity properties but it requires a reference point the choice of which is often done ad-hoc. In this study the concept of set monotonic functions for dominated subsets is introduced. Moreover, this work presents a reference point free hypervolume indicator that uses a density that is derived from the user's preferences expressed as desirability functions. This approach will bias the distribution of the approximation set towards a set that more densely samples highly desirable solutions of the objective space. We show that the Harrington type and the Derringer-Suich type of desirability functions yield definite integrals and that the Harrington type has also the favorable property to provide a set-monotonic function over the set of dominated subspaces. It is shown that for a product type of aggregation the weighted hypervolume indicator is mathematically equivalent with an approach that computes the standard hypervolume indicator after transformation of the axes. In addition a probabilistic interpretation of desirability functions is discussed and how a correlation parameter can be introduced in order to change the aggregation type. Finally, practical guidelines for using the discussed set indicator in multiobjective search, for instance when searching for interesting subsets from a database, are provided.

[1]  Nicola Beume,et al.  On the Complexity of Computing the Hypervolume Indicator , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[2]  Carlos M. Fonseca,et al.  Artificial Evolution , 2011, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[3]  Timothy M. Chan Klee's Measure Problem Made Easy , 2013, 2013 IEEE 54th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[4]  Heike Trautmann,et al.  On the distribution of the desirability index using Harrington’s desirability function , 2006 .

[5]  Carlos M. Fonseca,et al.  A Fast Dimension-Sweep Algorithm for the Hypervolume Indicator in Four Dimensions , 2012, CCCG.

[6]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Statistical Improvement Criteria for Use in Multiobjective Design Optimization , 2006 .

[7]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[8]  Anne Auger,et al.  Investigating and exploiting the bias of the weighted hypervolume to articulate user preferences , 2009, GECCO.

[9]  José Luis Bermúdez,et al.  Decision Theory and Rationality , 2009 .

[10]  Thomas Bäck,et al.  Combining Aggregation with Pareto Optimization: A Case Study in Evolutionary Molecular Design , 2009, EMO.

[11]  Heike Trautmann,et al.  Integration of Preferences in Hypervolume-Based Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms by Means of Desirability Functions , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[13]  Michael T. M. Emmerich,et al.  Test Problems Based on Lamé Superspheres , 2007, EMO.

[14]  George C. Derringer,et al.  Is the Regression Equation Adequate?-One Criterion , 1977 .

[15]  Michael T. M. Emmerich,et al.  Single- and multiobjective evolutionary optimization assisted by Gaussian random field metamodels , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[16]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  The Hypervolume Indicator Revisited: On the Design of Pareto-compliant Indicators Via Weighted Integration , 2007, EMO.

[17]  Tom Dhaene,et al.  Fast calculation of multiobjective probability of improvement and expected improvement criteria for Pareto optimization , 2014, J. Glob. Optim..

[18]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Nonlinear multiobjective optimization , 1998, International series in operations research and management science.

[19]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.