An exploration of design thinking across educational domains

To teach design effectively foundational design thinking needs to be understood. Treating the design process as a mysterious mental talent provides little scope for teaching the subject. This study explores the origin of designs and how experience impacts the sophistication of design ideas across educational domains. Secondary and tertiary students were given a common architectural brief and students' outcomes were compared and contrasted to seek commonalities or differences in their approaches to solving design problems. Additionally, interviews were conducted with participants and a panel of design experts to further explore the students' design practices. The results provide insight into design cognition from multiple viewpoints. We argue that designs come from various forms of copying; metaphors, analogies and icons are used as preconceptions by which a design problem is understood. Moreover, experience had a direct link to expertise which is evident across educational domains.

[1]  Martin Heidegger,et al.  What Is Called Thinking , 1954 .

[2]  Philip Roberts,et al.  What is Design , 1982 .

[3]  D. Schoen.  The Reflective Practitioner , 1983 .

[4]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Design cognition: results from protocol and other empirical studies of design activity , 2016 .

[5]  Horst W.J. Rittel,et al.  Zur Planungskrise: Systemanalyse der «ersten und zweiten Generation» / On the Planning Crisis: Systems Analysis of the « First and Second Generations » , 2013 .

[6]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Expertise in engineering design , 1998 .

[7]  D. Spendlove.  We feel therefore we learn : the location of emotion in the creative and learning experience (Part 1). Paper adapted from the Keynote presented on 5 July at the Design and Technology Association Education and International Research Conference 2007 ... , 2008 .

[8]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Descriptive models of creative design: application to an example , 1997 .

[9]  H. Simon,et al.  The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[10]  Lachlan MacPherson,et al.  What Is Design? , 1955, Design Engineering and Science.

[11]  Maurice Merleau-Ponty.  Phenomenology of Perception , 1964 .

[12]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Design method and scientific method , 1981 .

[13]  N. Cross.  The Nature and Nurture of Design Ability , 1990 .

[14]  N. Cross.  Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline Versus Design Science , 2001, Design Issues.

[15]  H. Rittel,et al.  On the Planning Crisis : Systems Analysis of the 'First an d Second Generations ' , 2006 .

[16]  Isabelle Reymen,et al.  Levels of expertise in design education , 2004 .

[17]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , 2001 .

[18]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Expertise in Design: an overview , 2004 .

[19]  Geoffrey Broadbent,et al.  Design in architecture : architecture and the human sciences / Geoffrey Broadbent , 1973 .

[20]  Spendlove David.  Still thinking and feeling: the location of emotion in the creative and learning experience (Part 2) , 2008 .

[21]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  A comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes , 1999 .

[22]  N. Cross.  The Expertise of Exceptional Designers , 2003 .