Intraoperative Sonografie zur Entfernung von nicht-palpablen und palpablen Mammakarzinomen: systematisches Review und Meta-Analyse

Zusammenfassung Drahtlokalisation stellt die am häufigsten verwendete Lokalisationsmethode bei nicht palpablen Mammakarzinomen dar. Zu potenziellen Nachteilen der Technik gehören eine niedrige Rate an R0-Resektionen, die Invasivität und das Risiko der Drahtdislokation. Des Weiteren ist die Notwendigkeit einer Re-Operation mit einem erhöhten Rezidivrisiko assoziiert. Intraoperative Sonografie (IOUS) erlaubt eine direkte Visualisierung der Läsion und des Resektionsvolumens und reduziert die Rate an positiven Rändern bei palpablen und nicht palpablen Tumoren. Wir führten ein systematisches Review der Studien zur IOUS durch. Die randomisierten Studien wurden in 2 Metaanalysen ausgewertet. In nicht palpablen Mammakarzinomen zeigten 3 randomisierte Studien höhere R0- Resektionsraten im IOUS-Arm, verglichen mit Drahtlokalisation. Der signifikante Unterschied konnte in der Metaanalyse bestätigt werden (Risk Ratio 4,34, p < 0,0001, I2 = 0 %). Die meisten der 41 Kohortenstudien mit 3291 Patientinnen zeigten höhere R0-Resektionsraten und niedrigere Nachresektionsraten bei Verwendung von IOUS. Eine Metaanalyse von 3 randomisierten Studien bei palpablem Mammakarzinom zeigte signifikant höhere Raten an positiven Rändern im Palpations-Arm (Risk Ratio 2,84, p=0,0047, I2=0%). In 13 Kohortenstudien mit 942 Patientinnen mit palpablem Mammakarzinom, waren die R0-Resektionsraten meist höher und die Gewebsvolumina niedriger bei Verwendung von IOUS. IOUS ist eine sichere nicht invasive Technik zur Lokalisation von sonografisch sichtbaren Tumoren und verbessert R0-Resektionsraten bei palpablem und nicht palpablem Mammakarzinom. Sonografische Weiterbildung für Brustoperateure erscheint empfehlenswert.

[1]  M. Lux,et al.  AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2021 , 2021, Breast Care.

[2]  S. Crawford,et al.  A decade of intraoperative ultrasound guided breast conservation for margin negative resection - Radioactive, and magnetic, and Infrared Oh My…. , 2020, American journal of surgery.

[3]  S. Lowes,et al.  Use of Hologic LOCalizer radiofrequency identification (RFID) tags to localise impalpable breast lesions and axillary nodes: experience of the first 150 cases in a UK breast unit. , 2020, Clinical radiology.

[4]  B. Srinath,et al.  A comparative study of perioperative techniques to attain negative margins and spare healthy breast tissue in breast conserving surgery. , 2020, Breast disease.

[5]  K. Mokbel,et al.  Savi Scout® Radar Localisation of Non-palpable Breast Lesions: Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of 842 Cases , 2020, AntiCancer Research.

[6]  D. Morgan,et al.  Preoperative Wire Localization of the Breast on the Day Before Surgery , 2020 .

[7]  I. Bennett,et al.  Comparison of intraoperative ultrasound‐guided excision and hookwire‐guided excision of impalpable breast lesions: An economic evaluation , 2020, The breast journal.

[8]  K. Mokbel,et al.  Evolving Role of Magseed in Wireless Localization of Breast Lesions: Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of 1,559 Procedures , 2020, AntiCancer Research.

[9]  Yinan Ji,et al.  Intraoperative ultrasound-guided lumpectomy versus wire-guided excision for nonpalpable breast cancer , 2020, The Journal of international medical research.

[10]  T. Ahern,et al.  Intraoperative Ultrasound Guidance With an Ultrasound‐Visible Clip: A Practical and Cost‐effective Option for Breast Cancer Localization , 2019, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[11]  I. Rubio,et al.  Learning curves in intraoperative ultrasound guided surgery in breast cancer based on complete breast cancer excision and no need for second surgeries. , 2019, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[12]  R. Parshad,et al.  Comparison of resection margins and cosmetic outcome following intraoperative ultrasound-guided excision versus conventional palpation-guided breast conservation surgery in breast cancer: A randomized controlled trial. , 2018, Indian journal of cancer.

[13]  V. Klimberg,et al.  Cutting Healthcare Costs with Hematoma-Directed Ultrasound-Guided Breast Lumpectomy , 2018, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[14]  D. Wallwiener,et al.  Ultrasound-Assisted Tumor Surgery in Breast Cancer – A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Center Study (MAC 001) , 2018, Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound.

[15]  S. Meijer,et al.  Breast‐specific factors determine cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction after breast‐conserving therapy: Results from the randomized COBALT study , 2018, Journal of surgical oncology.

[16]  Stacey Fisher,et al.  Re-excision and survival following breast conserving surgery in early stage breast cancer patients: a population-based study , 2018, BMC Health Services Research.

[17]  Richard Ha,et al.  Innovations in image-guided preoperative breast lesion localization. , 2018, The British journal of radiology.

[18]  Reshma Jagsi,et al.  Trends in Reoperation After Initial Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer: Addressing Overtreatment in Surgical Management , 2017, JAMA oncology.

[19]  S. Meijer,et al.  Intraoperative ultrasound guidance in breast-conserving surgery shows superiority in oncological outcome, long-term cosmetic and patient-reported outcomes: Final outcomes of a randomized controlled trial (COBALT). , 2017, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[20]  R E Pataky,et al.  Reoperation costs in attempted breast-conserving surgery: a decision analysis. , 2016, Current oncology.

[21]  I. Rubio,et al.  Intraoperative ultrasound guided breast surgery: paving the way for personalized surgery. , 2016, Gland surgery.

[22]  S. Costa,et al.  Ultrasound-Guided Versus Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery for Nonpalpable Breast Cancer. , 2016, Clinical breast cancer.

[23]  A. Schneeweiss,et al.  Do Patients After Reexcision Due to Involved or Close Margins Have the Same Risk of Local Recurrence as Those After One-Step Breast-Conserving Surgery? , 2016, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[24]  Katrin Jensen,et al.  Localization techniques for guided surgical excision of non-palpable breast lesions. , 2015, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[25]  H. Karanlık,et al.  Intraoperative ultrasound reduces the need for re-excision in breast-conserving surgery , 2015, World Journal of Surgical Oncology.

[26]  Juan Pablo Salazar,et al.  Intraoperative Ultrasound-Guided Lumpectomy Versus Mammographic Wire Localization for Breast Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Treatment , 2015, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[27]  M. Ramos,et al.  Intraoperative ultrasound in conservative surgery for non-palpable breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2014, International journal of surgery.

[28]  S. Cawthorn,et al.  Why should breast surgeons use ultrasound? , 2014, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[29]  T. Ignatov,et al.  Ultrasonography-guided breast-conserving surgery is superior to palpation-guided surgery for palpable breast cancer. , 2014, Clinical breast cancer.

[30]  J. Dai,et al.  Intraoperative Ultrasound Guidance Is Associated with Clear Lumpectomy Margins for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2013, PloS one.

[31]  M. Ahmed,et al.  Intra-operative ultrasound versus wire-guided localization in the surgical management of non-palpable breast cancers: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2013, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[32]  S. Meijer,et al.  Ultrasound-guided surgery for palpable breast cancer is cost-saving: results of a cost-benefit analysis. , 2013, Breast.

[33]  J. Kollias,et al.  Evaluation of Office Ultrasound Usage among Australian and New Zealand Breast Surgeons , 2013, World Journal of Surgery.

[34]  S. Meijer,et al.  Intraoperative ultrasound guidance for palpable breast cancer excision (COBALT trial): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[35]  S. Muller,et al.  Optimising surgical accuracy in palpable breast cancer with intra-operative breast ultrasound--feasibility and surgeons' learning curve. , 2011, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[36]  S. Meijer,et al.  Excessive Resections in Breast‐Conserving Surgery: A Retrospective Multicentre Study , 2011, The breast journal.

[37]  S. Meijer,et al.  A comparison of three methods for nonpalpable breast cancer excision. , 2011, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[38]  Kent Westbrook,et al.  Ten-Year Experience with Hematoma-Directed Ultrasound-Guided (HUG) Breast Lumpectomy , 2010, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[39]  Karthik Raghavan,et al.  Intraoperative breast problem--focused sonography a valuable tool in the training of surgical residents. , 2008, Journal of surgical education.

[40]  S. Meijer,et al.  Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast cancer versus wire-guided resection: A randomized clinical trial , 2002, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[41]  G. Rozycki,et al.  An evaluation of the American College of Surgeons' ultrasound education program. , 2006, American journal of surgery.

[42]  I. Rubio,et al.  Surgical use of breast ultrasound. , 2003, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[43]  P. V. van Diest,et al.  Ultrasound‐guided lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast cancers: A feasibility study looking at the accuracy of obtained margins , 1999, Journal of surgical oncology.