Evaluating the efficacy of semi-pelagic trawl gear to harvest demersal fishes in the U.S

This study involved catch comparison sampling and analyses to determine how changing from a conventional trawl rigged with bottom tending doors to a semi-pelagic trawl rigged with midwater doors affect the catch efficiency of demersal fishes in the West Coast groundfish bottom trawl fishery. For both trawl designs, the most abundant species caught by weight were sablefish, Dover sole, shortspine thornyhead, petrale sole, and lingcod. Mean CPUE values for Dover sole, lingcod, and petrale sole were slightly higher in the semi-pelagic trawl, whereas the conventional trawl showed a slightly higher mean CPUE effort value for shortspine thornyhead. However, these results were only trends and not significant. For sablefish, a significant catch result was observed with the semi-pelagic trawl catching significantly more sablefish (a mean CPUE increase of 169.8% [95% CLs: 38.9-327.9]) than the conventional trawl. Trawl door sensors showed the semi-pelagic trawl exhibited a 42.1 m increase in door spread compared to the conventional trawl, while bottom contact sensors showed the midwater trawl doors outfitted on the semi-pelagic trawl fished on average a minimum of 0.8 m above the seafloor; Thus, providing sufficient height for lower-profile epifaunal and infaunal organisms to pass under the door without contact or disturbance. Our research demonstrates that semi-pelagic trawl gear can effectively harvest demersal groundfishes in the West Coast groundfish bottom trawl fishery while significantly reducing trawl-seafloor interactions.

[1]  M. Sköld,et al.  Physical Disturbance by Bottom Trawling Suspends Particulate Matter and Alters Biogeochemical Processes on and Near the Seafloor , 2021, Frontiers in Marine Science.

[2]  Mark J. M. Lomeli,et al.  Evaluating off-bottom sweeps of a U.S. West Coast groundfish bottom trawl: Effects on catch efficiency and seafloor interactions , 2019, Fisheries Research.

[3]  B. Herrmann,et al.  Catch Efficiency of Groundgears in a Bottom Trawl Fishery: A Case Study of the Barents Sea Haddock , 2018, Marine and Coastal Fisheries.

[4]  Claire L. Szostek,et al.  Response of benthic fauna to experimental bottom fishing: A global meta‐analysis , 2018 .

[5]  F. Meysman,et al.  Anthropogenic disturbance keeps the coastal seafloor biogeochemistry in a transient state , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[6]  E. Grimaldo,et al.  Energy consumption of three different trawl configurations used in the Barents Sea demersal trawl fishery , 2015 .

[7]  Bent Herrmann,et al.  Understanding the Size Selectivity of Redfish (Sebastes spp.) in North Atlantic Trawl Codends , 2012 .

[8]  Pingguo He,et al.  Effect of trawling on the seabed and mitigation measures to reduce impact. , 2010 .

[9]  M. Hixon,et al.  Comparison of trawled vs untrawled mud seafloor assemblages of fishes and macroinvertebrates at Coquille Bank, Oregon , 2007 .

[10]  Jeremy S. Collie,et al.  Modification of marine habitats by trawling activities: prognosis and solutions , 2002 .

[11]  Craig S. Rose,et al.  Effective herding of flatfish by cables with minimal seafloor contact , 2010 .

[12]  John Willy Valdemarsen,et al.  Options to mitigate bottom habitat impact of dragged gears , 2007 .

[13]  Michel J. Kaiser,et al.  The effects of fishing on marine ecosystems , 1998 .

[14]  International Council for the Exploration of the Sea , 1949, Nature.