Call to Action for Advancing Equitable Genomic Newborn Screening

Newborn screening (NBS) facilitates early detection and treatment of infants with rare, treatable conditions, improving their health and well-being. Integrating genomic sequencing into NBS (genomic newborn screening, or gNBS) is an approach being considered by an increasing number of jurisdictions worldwide. Despite the potential benefits of gNBS, there remain substantial challenges to its global implementation. The purpose of this perspective paper is to discuss four pressing challenges to the equitable implementation of gNBS at a population level, and to present calls to action for each challenge. The four pressing challenges are selecting conditions for gNBS, respecting self-determination through informed consent and parent education, protecting privacy and confidentiality, and mitigating adverse psychosocial sequelae. All of these topics highlight significant disparities between high-income and low- and middle-income countries in implementing gNBS, which will make its equitable implementation even more challenging. The proposed calls to action acknowledge and provide recommendations for addressing these disparities. Across all of the challenges, the impact of local and community resources, priorities, policies, and infrastructure on implementation of gNBS is an especially important consideration. Differences between jurisdictions will influence whether, when, and how gNBS is implemented. Substantial gaps in empirical knowledge of gNBS remain, underscoring opportunities for innovative research. The pressing challenges discussed in this perspective paper must be addressed for the equitable and just implementation of gNBS and advancement of global health equity.

[1]  D. Bick,et al.  Genomic newborn screening: Are we entering a new era of screening? , 2023, Journal of inherited metabolic disease.

[2]  R. Scott,et al.  Genomic newborn screening for rare diseases , 2023, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[3]  C. Chapman,et al.  Protect newborn screening programs , 2023, Science.

[4]  Anne L. Ersig,et al.  Psychosocial Issues Related to Newborn Screening: A Systematic Review and Synthesis , 2022, International journal of neonatal screening.

[5]  R. Currier Newborn Screening Is on a Collision Course with Public Health Ethics , 2022, International journal of neonatal screening.

[6]  R. Scott,et al.  Newborn Screening by Genomic Sequencing: Opportunities and Challenges , 2022, International journal of neonatal screening.

[7]  B. Knoppers,et al.  Exome/Genome-Wide Testing in Newborn Screening: A Proportionate Path Forward , 2022, Frontiers in Genetics.

[8]  B. Biesecker,et al.  Education and Consent for Population-Based DNA Screening: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of the Early Check Newborn Screening Pilot Study , 2022, Frontiers in Genetics.

[9]  M. Khoury,et al.  Health equity in the implementation of genomics and precision medicine: A public health imperative. , 2022, Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics.

[10]  Aashish N. Adhikari,et al.  The Use of Whole Genome and Exome Sequencing for Newborn Screening: Challenges and Opportunities for Population Health , 2021, Frontiers in Pediatrics.

[11]  R. Bradshaw,et al.  Patient Interactions With an Automated Conversational Agent Delivering Pretest Genetics Education: Descriptive Study , 2021, Journal of medical Internet research.

[12]  L. Henneman,et al.  Informing Parents about Newborn Screening: A European Comparison Study , 2021, International journal of neonatal screening.

[13]  G. Feldman,et al.  The Current State of Newborn Screening in the United States. , 2019, Pediatric clinics of North America.

[14]  K. Machaczek,et al.  Family planning decisions for parents of children with a rare genetic condition: A scoping review. , 2017, Sexual & reproductive healthcare : official journal of the Swedish Association of Midwives.

[15]  S. Saha,et al.  African American experiences in healthcare: "I always feel like I'm getting skipped over". , 2016, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[16]  S. Fullerton,et al.  Using Genetic Technologies To Reduce, Rather Than Widen, Health Disparities. , 2016, Health affairs.

[17]  L. Bell Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. , 2015, The Alabama nurse.

[18]  Natalie Williams Responsible conduct of research , 2014 .

[19]  A. Tluczek,et al.  Newborn screening policy and practice issues for nurses. , 2013, Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN.

[20]  T. Ørntoft,et al.  Robustness of genome-wide scanning using archived dried blood spot samples as a DNA source , 2011, BMC Genetics.

[21]  A. Tluczek,et al.  Psychosocial Consequences of False-Positive Newborn Screens for Cystic Fibrosis , 2011, Qualitative health research.

[22]  D. Bowen,et al.  Communicating Genetic and Genomic Information: Health Literacy and Numeracy Considerations , 2010, Public Health Genomics.

[23]  Roger L. Brown,et al.  Newborn Screening: An Appeal for Improved Parent Education , 2009, The Journal of perinatal & neonatal nursing.

[24]  S. Robertson,et al.  Maternal Psychological Reaction to Newborn Genetic Screening for Type 1 Diabetes , 2007, Pediatrics.

[25]  Rachel Grob Parenting in the genomic age: the ‘cursed blessing’ of newborn screening , 2006 .

[26]  Dimitri A Christakis,et al.  State Newborn Screening in the Tandem Mass Spectrometry Era: More Tests, More False-Positive Results , 2006, Pediatrics.

[27]  R. Koscik,et al.  Psychosocial Risk Associated With Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis: Parents’ Experience While Awaiting the Sweat-Test Appointment , 2005, Pediatrics.

[28]  S. Oliver,et al.  Disclosing to parents newborn carrier status identified by routine blood spot screening. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[29]  H. Cuckle,et al.  Psychosocial aspects of genetic screening of pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review. , 2004, Health technology assessment.

[30]  THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION , 1954 .