Coarse Blobs or Fine Edges? Evidence That Information Diagnosticity Changes the Perception of Complex Visual Stimuli

Efficient categorizations of complex visual stimuli require effective encodings of their distinctive properties. However, the question remains of how processes of object and scene categorization use the information associated with different perceptual spatial scales. The psychophysics of scale perception suggests that recognition uses coarse blobs before fine scale edges, because the former is perceptually available before the latter. Although possible, this perceptually determined scenario neglects the nature of the task the recognition system must solve. If different spatial scales transmit different information about the input, an identical scene might be flexibly encoded and perceived at the scale that optimizes information for the considered task-i.e., the diagnostic scale. This paper tests the hypothesis that scale diagnosticity can determine scale selection for recognition. Experiment 1 tested whether coarse and fine spatial scales were both available at the onset of scene categorization. The second experiment tested that the selection of one scale could change depending on the diagnostic information present at this scale. The third and fourth experiments investigated whether scale-specific cues were independently processed, or whether they perceptually cooperated in the recognition of the input scene. Results suggest that a mandatory low-level registration of multiple spatial scales promotes flexible scene encodings, perceptions, and categorizations.

[1]  Journal of the Optical Society of America , 1950, Nature.

[2]  A Pantle,et al.  Size-Detecting Mechanisms in Human Vision , 1968, Science.

[3]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  C Blakemore,et al.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  J. Thomas Model of the function of receptive fields in human vision. , 1970, Psychological review.

[6]  J. Robson,et al.  Spatial-frequency channels in human vision. , 1971, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[7]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Spatial vision. , 1971, Annual review of psychology.

[8]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Some experiments bearing on the hypothesis that the visual system analyses spatial patterns in independent bands of spatial frequency , 1975, Vision Research.

[9]  B G Breitmeyer,et al.  Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing. , 1976, Psychological review.

[10]  M. Potter Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[11]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[12]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[13]  D. Navon Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  M. Posner Chronometric explorations of mind : the third Paul M. Fitts lectures, delivered at the University of Michigan, September 1976 , 1978 .

[15]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  D Marr,et al.  Theory of edge detection , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[17]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  H. Intraub Rapid conceptual identification of sequentially presented pictures. , 1981 .

[20]  Oliver Braddick Spatial frequency analysis in vision , 1981, Nature.

[21]  Irvin Rock,et al.  The effect of inattention on form perception. , 1981 .

[22]  J Sergent,et al.  Theoretical and methodological consequences of variations in exposure duration in visual laterality studies , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  T. Carr,et al.  Words, pictures, and priming: on semantic activation, conscious identification, and the automaticity of information processing. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  P. Merikle,et al.  Unconscious perception revisited , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  I. Biederman,et al.  Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  L M Ward,et al.  Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  The Laplacian Pyramid as a Compact Image Code , 1983, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[28]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[29]  Andrew P. Witkin,et al.  Scale-Space Filtering , 1983, IJCAI.

[30]  A. Marcel Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  C. Schor,et al.  Spatial tuning of static and dynamic local stereopsis , 1984, Vision Research.

[32]  J. Daugman Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortical filters. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[33]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Preattentive processing in vision , 1985, Computer Vision Graphics and Image Processing.

[34]  R. L. de Valois,et al.  Relationship between spatial-frequency and orientation tuning of striate-cortex cells. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[35]  Arnulf Remole,et al.  VISUAL MASKING: AN INTEGRATIVE APPROACH , 1985 .

[36]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  S. Tipper The Negative Priming Effect: Inhibitory Priming by Ignored Objects , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[38]  R. Watt,et al.  A theory of the primitive spatial code in human vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[39]  M C Morrone,et al.  Recognition of Positive and Negative Bandpass-Filtered Images , 1986, Perception.

[40]  G L Shulman,et al.  The Role of Spatial-Frequency Channels in the Perception of Local and Global Structure , 1986, Perception.

[41]  A. Ginsburg Spatial filtering and visual form perception. , 1986 .

[42]  J. Sergent Microgenesis of Face Perception , 1986 .

[43]  Daniel Holender,et al.  Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal , 1986, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[44]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[45]  H. Hughes,et al.  Asymmetric interference between components of suprathreshold compound gratings , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[46]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[48]  Joel Norman,et al.  Spatial frequency filtering and target identification , 1987, Vision Research.

[49]  R. Watt Scanning from coarse to fine spatial scales in the human visual system after the onset of a stimulus. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[50]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Temporal changes in the distribution of attention in the visual field in response to precues , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[51]  J Wilson,et al.  Spatial Frequency and Selective Attention to Local and Global Information , 1987, Perception.

[52]  S. Tipper,et al.  Negative priming between pictures and words in a selective attention task: Evidence for semantic processing of ignored stimuli , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[53]  P. Merikle,et al.  Global precedence in attended and nonattended objects. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[55]  M J Farah,et al.  Semantic and perceptual priming: how similar are the underlying mechanisms? , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[56]  K. Rayner,et al.  The effect of background information on object identification , 2017 .

[57]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[58]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Stereopsis and contrast , 1989, Vision Research.

[59]  D R Badcock,et al.  Low-Frequency Filtering and the Processing of Local—Global Stimuli , 1990, Perception.

[60]  P. Reuter-Lorenz,et al.  Global Versus Local Processing in the Absence of Low Spatial Frequencies , 1990, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[61]  Philippe G. Schyns,et al.  The ontogeny of units in object categories , 1991 .

[62]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Zero-crossings of a wavelet transform , 1991, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[63]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[64]  R. Kimchi Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: a critical review. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[65]  J. Lishman,et al.  Apparent duration and spatial structure , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[66]  M. J. Morgan,et al.  Spatial filtering precedes motion detection , 1992, Nature.

[67]  Robert J. Snowden,et al.  Subtractive and divisive adaptation in the human visual system , 1992, Nature.

[68]  J. Henderson Object identification in context: the visual processing of natural scenes. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[69]  J R Lishman,et al.  Temporal Integration of Spatially Filtered Visual Images , 1992, Perception.

[70]  G E Legge,et al.  Color improves object recognition in normal and low vision. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[71]  H D Ellis,et al.  Covert face recognition without prosopagnosia. , 1993, Behavioural neurology.

[72]  John M. Findlay,et al.  The spatial signal for saccadic eye movements emphasizes visual boundaries , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[73]  E W Yund,et al.  The role of spatial frequency in the processing of hierarchically organized stimuli , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[74]  N Kanwisher,et al.  Negative priming for spatial locations: identity mismatching, not distractor inhibition. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[75]  P. Schyns,et al.  The Ontogeny of Part Representation in Object Concepts , 1994 .

[76]  Robert L. Goldstone Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[77]  A. Oliva,et al.  From Blobs to Boundary Edges: Evidence for Time- and Spatial-Scale-Dependent Scene Recognition , 1994 .

[78]  I. Craw,et al.  Spatial Content and Spatial Quantisation Effects in Face Recognition , 1994, Perception.

[79]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Unconscious priming of association judgments. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[80]  M. Lamb Spatial Frequency and Interference Between Global and Local Levels of Structure , 1996 .

[81]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness , 1996, Nature.

[82]  A. Treisman,et al.  Object tokens, attention, and visual memory. , 1996 .

[83]  J R Lishman,et al.  Role of coarse and fine spatial information in face and object processing. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[84]  E. William Yund,et al.  Spatial frequency and attention: Effects of level-, target-, and location-repetition on the processing of global and local forms , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[85]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Information integration in perception and communication , 1996 .

[86]  A. Treisman,et al.  Visual memory for novel shapes: implicit coding without attention. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[87]  L. Robertson,et al.  Attentional persistence for features of hierarchical patterns. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[88]  H. Hughes,et al.  Global Precedence, Spatial Frequency Channels, and the Statistics of Natural Images , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[89]  Richard L. Abrams,et al.  Three Cognitive Markers of Unconscious Semantic Activation , 1996, Science.

[90]  W. Singer,et al.  In search of common foundations for cortical computation , 1997, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[91]  A. Oliva,et al.  Flexible, Diagnosticity-Driven, Rather Than Fixed, Perceptually Determined Scale Selection in Scene and Face Recognition , 1997, Perception.

[92]  P. Schyns,et al.  Information and viewpoint dependence in face recognition , 1997, Cognition.

[93]  P. Schyns,et al.  Categorization creates functional features , 1997 .

[94]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The development of features in object concepts , 1998, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[95]  Philippe G Schyns,et al.  Diagnostic recognition: task constraints, object information, and their interactions , 1998, Cognition.