Who Wants to Deliberate - and Why?

Interest in deliberative theories of democracy has grown tremendously among political theorists over the last twenty years. Many scholars in political behavior, however, are skeptical that it is a practically viable theory, even on its own terms. They argue (inter alia) that most people dislike politics, and that deliberative initiatives would amount to a paternalistic imposition. Using two large, representative samples investigating people's hypothetical willingness to deliberate and their actual behavior in response to a real invitation to deliberate with their member of Congress, we find: 1) that willingness to deliberate in the U.S. is much more widespread than expected; and 2) that it is precisely people who are less likely to participate in traditional partisan politics who are most interested in deliberative participation. They are attracted to such participation as a partial alternative to "politics as usual."

[1]  C. Sunstein Republic.com 2.0 , 2007 .

[2]  Stephen K. White,et al.  Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy@@@The Cambridge Companion to Habermas , 1997 .

[3]  G. Marcus The Sentimental Citizen: Emotion in Democratic Politics , 2002 .

[4]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[5]  P. Abramson,et al.  Race-Related Differences in Self-Reported and Validated Turnout , 1984, The Journal of Politics.

[6]  Richard Williams Generalized Ordered Logit/Partial Proportional Odds Models for Ordinal Dependent Variables , 2006 .

[7]  D. Lazer,et al.  Means, Motive, and Opportunity in Becoming Informed about Politics: A Deliberative Field Experiment with Members of Congress and Their Constituents , 2011 .

[8]  C. Pateman Participation and democratic theory , 1970 .

[9]  Jane J. Mansbridge Beyond Adversary Democracy , 1980 .

[10]  Thomas Brambor,et al.  Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses , 2006, Political Analysis.

[11]  Diana C. Mutz The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation , 2002 .

[12]  R. Posner Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy , 2003 .

[13]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society , 1989 .

[14]  L. Sanders,et al.  Against Deliberation , 1997 .

[15]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  B. Sweetman Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy , 1997 .

[17]  James S. Fishkin,et al.  The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy , 1995 .

[18]  Nancy Burns,et al.  The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation , 2001 .

[19]  Diana C. Mutz Is Deliberative Democracy a Falsifiable Theory , 2008 .

[20]  Dean Lacy,et al.  A Theory of Nonseparable Preferences in Survey Responses , 2001 .

[21]  Dana Ward,et al.  Right-Wing Authoritarianism , 1982 .

[22]  Richard E Petty,et al.  The impact of personality on cognitive, behavioral, and affective political processes: the effects of need to evaluate. , 2004, Journal of personality.

[23]  Tali Mendelberg THE DELIBERATIVE CITIZEN: THEORY AND EVIDENCE , 2009 .

[24]  L. Sanders Democratic Politics and Survey Research , 1999 .

[25]  D. Lazer,et al.  Estimating Treatment Effects in the Presence of Noncompliance and Nonresponse: The Generalized Endogenous Treatment Model , 2011, Political Analysis.

[26]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[27]  Nina Eliasoph,et al.  Avoiding Politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life , 2000 .

[28]  Dennis F. Thompson Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science , 2008 .

[29]  Mark Conner,et al.  Moderator effects of attitudinal ambivalence on attitude-behaviour relationships , 2002 .

[30]  Michael X. Delli Carpini,et al.  Talking Together: Public Deliberation and Political Participation in America, by Lawrence R. Jacobs, Fay Lomax Cook, and Michael X. Delli Carpini , 2010 .

[31]  Michael A. Neblo,et al.  Thinking through Democracy: Between the Theory and Practice of Deliberative Politics , 2005 .

[32]  J. Dewey,et al.  The Public and its Problems , 1927 .

[33]  Alain Boyer Democracy and Disagreement , 1995 .

[34]  Stephen Macedo,et al.  Deliberative politics : essays on democracy and disagreement , 1999 .

[35]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiryinto a category of bourgeois society , 1991 .

[36]  S. Rosenberg Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern? , 2007 .

[37]  John S. Dryzek,et al.  Handle with Care: The Deadly Hermeneutics of Deliberative Instrumentation , 2005 .

[38]  Diana C. Mutz Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy , 2006 .

[39]  Tali Mendelberg,et al.  Race and Public Deliberation , 2000 .

[40]  M. D. Carpini,et al.  Who Deliberates? Discursive Participation in America , 2007 .

[41]  M. D. Carpini,et al.  Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature , 2004 .

[42]  Benjamin I. Page Who Deliberates?: Mass Media in Modern Democracy , 1996 .

[43]  Jason Barabas Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. , 2007, The Journal of Politics.

[44]  S. Keeter,et al.  What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters , 1996 .

[45]  Elizabeth Theiss-Morse,et al.  Stealth Democracy: Americans' Desire for Stealth Democracy , 2002 .

[46]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics , 1996 .

[47]  Family Disputes: Diversity in Defining and Measuring Deliberation , 2007 .

[48]  D. Lazer,et al.  Deliberative Ripples: The Network Effects of Political Events , 2010 .