Response of microbial adhesives and biofilm matrix polymers to chemical treatments as determined by interference reflection microscopy and light section microscopy

The polymers involved in the adhesion of Pseudomonas fluorescens H2S to solid surfaces were investigated to determine whether differences between cell surface adhesives and biofilm matrix polymers could be detected. Two optical techniques, i.e., interference reflection microscopy (IRM) and light section microscopy (LSM), were used to compare the responses of the two types of polymer to treatment with electrolytes, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and Tween 20. To evaluate initial adhesive polymers, P. fluorescens H2S cells were allowed to attach to glass cover slip surfaces and were immediately examined with IRM, and their response to chemical solutions was tested. With IRM, changes in cell-substratum separation distance between 0 and ca. 100 nm are detectable as changes in relative light intensity of the image; a contraction of the polymer would be detected as a darkening of the image, whereas expansion would appear as image brightening. To evaluate the intercellular polymer matrix in biofilms, 3-day-old biofilms were exposed to similar solutions, and the resultant change in biofilm thickness was measured with LSM, which measures film thicknesses between 10 and 1,000 microns. The initial adhesive and biofilm polymers were similar in that both appeared to contract when treated with electrolytes and to expand when treated with Tween 20. However, with DMSO treatment, the initial adhesive polymer appeared to contract, whereas there was no change in thickness of the biofilm polymer. These results indicate that both polymers bear acidic groups and thus act electrostatically with cations and are able to enter into hydrophobic interactions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[1]  M. Fletcher Effects of electrolytes on attachment of aquatic bacteria to solid surfaces , 1988 .

[2]  M. Fletcher Attachment of Pseudomonas fluorescens to glass and influence of electrolytes on bacterium-substratum separation distance , 1988, Journal of bacteriology.

[3]  J. B. Guckert,et al.  Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopic methods for microbial ecology: analysis of bacteria, bacteria-polymer mixtures and biofilms. , 1985, Journal of microbiological methods.

[4]  J. Paul,et al.  Evidence for Separate Adhesion Mechanisms for Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Surfaces in Vibrio proteolytica , 1985, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[5]  A. J. Wicken Bacterial Cell Walls and Surfaces , 1985 .

[6]  Thomas J. Marrie,et al.  Phenomena of Bacterial Adhesion , 1985 .

[7]  T. Preston,et al.  Amoeboid locomotion of Acanthamoeba castellanii with special reference to cell-substratum interactions. , 1984, Journal of general microbiology.

[8]  M. Fletcher,et al.  Selection of Attachment Mutants during the Continuous Culture of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Relationship between Attachment Ability and Surface Composition , 1983 .

[9]  J. Pringle,et al.  Influence of Substratum Wettability on Attachment of Freshwater Bacteria to Solid Surfaces , 1983, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[10]  M. Fletcher,et al.  Bubble Contact Angle Method for Evaluating Substratum Interfacial Characteristics and Its Relevance to Bacterial Attachment , 1982, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[11]  D. Gingell,et al.  Cell-Glass Separation Depends on Salt Concentration and Valency: Measurements on Dictyostelium Amoebae by Finite Aperture Interferometry , 1982 .

[12]  K. Marshall Microorganisms and Interfaces , 1980 .

[13]  B. Norkrans,et al.  On Bacterial Adhesion – The Effect of Certain Enzymes on Adhered Cells of a Marine Pseudomonas sp. , 1977 .

[14]  C. S. Izzard,et al.  Cell-to-substrate contacts in living fibroblasts: an interference reflexion study with an evaluation of the technique. , 1976, Journal of cell science.

[15]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  Adhesions of fibroblasts to substratum during contact inhibition observed by interference reflection microscopy. , 1975, Experimental cell research.

[16]  R. Henderson,et al.  EFFECTS OF DIMETHYL SULFOXIDE ON SUBUNIT PROTEINS * , 1975, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[17]  M. Fletcher,et al.  An Electron-microscopic Demonstration of an Acidic Polysaccharide Involved in the Adhesion of a Marine Bacterium to Solid Surfaces , 1973 .

[18]  A. S. G. Curtis,et al.  THE MECHANISM OF ADHESION OF CELLS TO GLASS , 1964, The Journal of cell biology.

[19]  S. Tolansky A light‐profile microscope for surface studies , 1952 .