Theoretical actinide molecular science.

Interest in the chemistry of the early actinide elements (notably uranium through americium) usually results either from the nuclear waste problem or the unique chemistry of these elements that result from 5f contributions to bonding. Computational actinide chemistry provides one useful tool for studying these processes. Theoretical actinide chemistry is challenging because three principal axes of approximation have to be optimized. These are the model chemistry (the choice of approximate electron-electron correlation method and basis sets), the approximate relativistic method, and a method for modeling solvent (condensed phase) effects. In this Account, we arrange these approximations in a three-dimensional diagram, implying that they are relatively independent of each other. A fourth level of approximation concerns the choice of suitable models for situations too complex to treat in their entirety. We discuss test cases for each of these approximations. Gas-phase data for uranium fluorides and oxofluorides such as UF(6) and UO(2)F(2) show that GGA functionals provide accurate geometries and frequencies while hybrid density functional theory (DFT) functionals are superior for energetics. MP2 is seen to be somewhat erratic for this set of compounds, and CCSD(T) gives the most accurate results. Three different relativistic methods, small-core effective core potentials (SC-ECP), ZORA, and all-electron scalar, provide comparable results. The older large-core ECP (LC-ECP) approach is consistently worse and should not be used. We confirmed these conclusions through studies of the actinyl aquo complexes [AnO(2)(OH(2))(5)](n+), (An = U, Np, or Pu and n = 1 or 2) that are also used to test solvation models. As long as the first coordination sphere of the metal is included explicitly, continuum solvation models are reliable, and we found no clear advantage for the (costly) explicit treatment of the second coordination sphere. Spin-orbit effects must be included to reproduce the correct trend in An(VI)/An(V) reduction potentials. We propose a multistep mechanism for the experimentally observed oxygen exchange of UO(2)(2+) cations in highly alkaline solutions present in tank wastes. This process involves an equilibrium between [UO(2)(OH)(4)](2-) and [UO(2)(OH)(5)](3-), followed by formation of the stable [UO(3)(OH)(3)](3-) intermediate that forms from [UO(2)(OH)(5)](3-) through intramolecular water elimination. The [UO(3)(OH)(3)](3-) intermediate facilitates oxygen exchange through proton shuttling. We explain the experimentally observed stabilization of the pentavalent oxidation state of actinyl ions by macrocyclic ligands (such as 18-crown-6) as an effect of solvation: the large macrocycle screens the positive charge of the ion from the polarizable solvent. Alkyl-substituted isoamethyrin complexes are bent despite being aromatic because of steric factors, rather than fit/misfit criteria regarding the actinyl ion. By application of an efficient DFT code, actinide molecules with more than 100 atoms can now be studied routinely. "Real" chemical questions can be answered as long as we take great care to apply methods that are accurate with respect to the three axes of approximation described above. While the exclusive focus of this Account has been on the early actinide elements, these conclusions also apply elsewhere in the periodic table.

[1]  Michael Dolg,et al.  Energy‐adjusted pseudopotentials for the actinides. Parameter sets and test calculations for thorium and thorium monoxide , 1994 .

[2]  V. Lynch,et al.  Actinide expanded porphyrin complexes , 2001 .

[3]  C. Hennig,et al.  Electrochemical and complexation behavior of neptunium in aqueous perchlorate and nitrate solutions. , 2008, Inorganic chemistry.

[4]  P. Dirac The quantum theory of the electron , 1928 .

[5]  Richard L. Martin,et al.  Theoretical studies of the structures and vibrational frequencies of actinide compounds using relativistic effective core potentials with Hartree–Fock and density functional methods: UF6, NpF6, and PuF6 , 1998 .

[6]  G. Schreckenbach,et al.  Theoretical Study of Stable Trans and Cis Isomers in [UO(2)(OH)(4)](2-) Using Relativistic Density Functional Theory. , 1998, Inorganic chemistry.

[7]  B. Scott,et al.  Hexaphyrin(1.0.1.0.0.0): An Expanded Porphyrin Ligand for the Actinide Cations Uranyl (UO(2)(2+)) and Neptunyl (NpO(2)(+)) This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant CHE-9725399 to J.L.S.), the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, and Defense Program , 2001, Angewandte Chemie.

[8]  G. Choppin,et al.  Actinides in Solution: Complexation and Kinetics , 2008 .

[9]  R. Rogers,et al.  Chemical Speciation of the Uranyl Ion under Highly Alkaline Conditions. Synthesis, Structures, and Oxo Ligand Exchange Dynamics. , 1999 .

[10]  F. Matthias Bickelhaupt,et al.  Chemistry with ADF , 2001, J. Comput. Chem..

[11]  J. Pople Two‐Dimensional Chart of Quantum Chemistry , 1965 .

[12]  G. Schreckenbach,et al.  Crown ether inclusion complexes of the early actinide elements, [AnO2(18-crown-6)]n+, An = U, Np, Pu and n = 1, 2: a relativistic density functional study. , 2008, Inorganic chemistry.

[13]  C. Marsden,et al.  Examining the performance of DFT methods in uranium chemistry: does core size matter for a pseudopotential? , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[14]  Patricia J. Melfi,et al.  Uranium complexes of multidentate N-donor ligands , 2006 .

[15]  Dimitri N. Laikov,et al.  PRIRODA-04: a quantum-chemical program suite. New possibilities in the study of molecular systems with the application of parallel computing , 2005 .

[16]  B. Scott,et al.  Hexaphyrin(1.0.1.0.0.0): An Expanded Porphyrin Ligand for the Actinide Cations Uranyl (UO22+ ) and Neptunyl (NpO2+ ). , 2001, Angewandte Chemie.

[17]  A. Streitwieser,et al.  Bis(cyclooctatetraenyl)uranium (uranocene). A new class of sandwich complexes that utilize atomic f orbitals , 1968 .

[18]  Richard L. Martin,et al.  Theoretical Studies of the Properties and Solution Chemistry of AnO22+and AnO2+Aquo Complexes for An = U, Np, and Pu , 2000 .

[19]  Richard L. Martin,et al.  Density functional calculations on actinide compounds: Survey of recent progress and application to [UO2X4]2− (X=F, Cl, OH) and AnF6 (An=U, Np, Pu) , 1999 .

[20]  Georg Schreckenbach,et al.  A comparative relativistic DFT and ab initio study on the structure and thermodynamics of the oxofluorides of uranium(IV), (V) and (VI). , 2007, Chemistry.

[21]  B. Scott,et al.  Synthesis and Structure of the First Transuranium Crown Ether Inclusion Complex: [NpO2([18]Crown‐6)]ClO4 , 1998 .

[22]  Georg Schreckenbach,et al.  Density functional calculations on actinide compounds: Survey of recent progress and application to [UO2X4]2- (X=F, Cl, OH) and AnF6 (An=U, Np, Pu) , 1999, J. Comput. Chem..

[23]  Pekka Pyykkö,et al.  Relativistic effects in structural chemistry , 1988 .

[24]  G. Schreckenbach,et al.  Density functional studies of actinyl aquo complexes studied using small-core effective core potentials and a scalar four-component relativistic method. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[25]  J. Stakebake,et al.  Handling, Storage, and Disposition of Plutonium and Uranium , 2008 .

[26]  G. Schreckenbach,et al.  Theoretical study of the oxygen exchange in uranyl hydroxide. An old riddle solved? , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[27]  M. Bühl,et al.  Effect of hydration on coordination properties of uranyl(VI) complexes. A first-principles molecular dynamics study. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[28]  P. Scott,et al.  The f Elements , 1999 .

[29]  G. Schreckenbach,et al.  Relativistic density functional theory study of dioxoactinide(VI) and -(V) complexation with alaskaphyrin and related Schiff-base macrocyclic ligands. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[30]  C. Barnes,et al.  A cis-dioxido uranyl: fluxional carboxylate activation from a reversible coordination polymer. , 2007, Angewandte Chemie.

[31]  D. Dixon,et al.  Predicting the energy of the water exchange reaction and free energy of solvation for the uranyl ion in aqueous solution. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[32]  Wolfram Koch,et al.  A Chemist's Guide to Density Functional Theory , 2000 .

[33]  Donald G. Truhlar,et al.  Implicit Solvation Models: Equilibria, Structure, Spectra, and Dynamics , 1999 .

[34]  Evert Jan Baerends,et al.  Relativistic regular two‐component Hamiltonians , 1993 .