A quantum gate between a flying optical photon and a single trapped atom

The steady increase in control over individual quantum systems supports the promotion of a quantum technology that could provide functionalities beyond those of any classical device. Two particularly promising applications have been explored during the past decade: photon-based quantum communication, which guarantees unbreakable encryption but which still has to be scaled to high rates over large distances, and quantum computation, which will fundamentally enhance computability if it can be scaled to a large number of quantum bits (qubits). It was realized early on that a hybrid system of light qubits and matter qubits could solve the scalability problem of each field—that of communication by use of quantum repeaters, and that of computation by use of an optical interconnect between smaller quantum processors. To this end, the development of a robust two-qubit gate that allows the linking of distant computational nodes is “a pressing challenge”. Here we demonstrate such a quantum gate between the spin state of a single trapped atom and the polarization state of an optical photon contained in a faint laser pulse. The gate mechanism presented is deterministic and robust, and is expected to be applicable to almost any matter qubit. It is based on reflection of the photonic qubit from a cavity that provides strong light–matter coupling. To demonstrate its versatility, we use the quantum gate to create atom–photon, atom–photon–photon and photon–photon entangled states from separable input states. We expect our experiment to enable various applications, including the generation of atomic and photonic cluster states and Schrödinger-cat states, deterministic photonic Bell-state measurements, scalable quantum computation and quantum communication using a redundant quantum parity code.

[1]  J. Feist,et al.  Coupling a Single Trapped Atom to a Nanoscale Optical Cavity , 2013, Science.

[2]  H. Kimble,et al.  Scalable photonic quantum computation through cavity-assisted interactions. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[3]  D. Hunger,et al.  Strong atom–field coupling for Bose–Einstein condensates in an optical cavity on a chip , 2007, Nature.

[4]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Going Beyond Bell’s Theorem , 2007, 0712.0921.

[5]  F. Verstraete,et al.  Sequential generation of entangled multiqubit states. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[6]  D. Awschalom,et al.  Quantum Spintronics: Engineering and Manipulating Atom-Like Spins in Semiconductors , 2013, Science.

[7]  S. Olmschenk,et al.  Quantum Teleportation Between Distant Matter Qubits , 2009, Science.

[8]  Andreas Reiserer,et al.  Nondestructive Detection of an Optical Photon , 2013, Science.

[9]  Zheng-Fu Han,et al.  Realizing quantum controlled phase flip through cavity QED (5 pages) , 2004 .

[10]  Jaeyoon Cho,et al.  Generation of atomic cluster states through the cavity input-output process. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[11]  Takao Aoki,et al.  A Photon Turnstile Dynamically Regulated by One Atom , 2008, Science.

[12]  P. Bertet,et al.  Step-by-step engineered multiparticle entanglement , 2000, Science.

[13]  H. J. Kimble,et al.  Robust quantum gates on neutral atoms with cavity-assisted photon scattering , 2005 .

[14]  Ruediger Schack,et al.  Unknown Quantum States and Operations, a Bayesian View , 2004, quant-ph/0404156.

[15]  Dirk Englund,et al.  Controlled Phase Shifts with a Single Quantum Dot , 2008, Science.

[16]  A. Rauschenbeutel,et al.  Strong coupling between single atoms and non-transversal photons , 2013, 2013 Conference on Lasers & Electro-Optics Europe & International Quantum Electronics Conference CLEO EUROPE/IQEC.

[17]  Todd A. Brun,et al.  Quantum Computing , 2011, Computer Science, The Hardware, Software and Heart of It.

[18]  A. Rauschenbeutel,et al.  Fiber-optical switch controlled by a single atom. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[19]  Luming Duan,et al.  Colloquium: Quantum networks with trapped ions , 2010 .

[20]  L.-M. Duan,et al.  Engineering superpositions of coherent states in coherent optical pulses through cavity-assisted interaction , 2005 .

[21]  Christoph Becher,et al.  Control and Measurement of Three-Qubit Entangled States , 2004, Science.

[22]  Gilles Brassard,et al.  Quantum Cryptography , 2005, Encyclopedia of Cryptography and Security.

[23]  G. Rempe,et al.  An elementary quantum network of single atoms in optical cavities , 2012, Nature.

[24]  William J. Munro,et al.  Deterministic photon entangler using a charged quantum dot inside a microcavity , 2008 .

[25]  P. Zoller,et al.  Photonic channels for quantum communication , 1998, Science.

[26]  Kae Nemoto,et al.  Quantum communication without the necessity of quantum memories , 2012, Nature Photonics.

[27]  Christian Nölleke,et al.  Ground-state cooling of a single atom at the center of an optical cavity. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[28]  Jakob Reichel,et al.  Measurement of the internal state of a single atom without energy exchange , 2011, Nature.

[29]  C. Monroe,et al.  Scaling the Ion Trap Quantum Processor , 2013, Science.

[30]  Cristian Bonato,et al.  CNOT and Bell-state analysis in the weak-coupling cavity QED regime. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[31]  Archil Avaliani,et al.  Quantum Computers , 2004, ArXiv.

[32]  Wolfgang Dür,et al.  Quantum Repeaters: The Role of Imperfect Local Operations in Quantum Communication , 1998 .

[33]  Hood,et al.  Measurement of conditional phase shifts for quantum logic. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[34]  Pedram Khalili Amiri,et al.  Quantum computers , 2003 .

[35]  L-M Duan,et al.  Efficient quantum computation with probabilistic quantum gates. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[36]  Yun-Feng Xiao,et al.  Universal quantum computation in decoherence-free subspace with neutral atoms. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[37]  Christian Nölleke,et al.  Efficient teleportation between remote single-atom quantum memories. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[38]  Christopher Monroe,et al.  Quantum Networks with Trapped Ions , 2007 .