Seeing Two as One: Linking Apparent Motion and Repetition Blindness

Object tokens are episodic visual representations that mediate the ability to track visual events as they move about and change over time. Multiple tokens also allow the viewer to individuate multiple instances of a single type of object. In the present study, we established a functional link for object tokens in two seemingly disparate visual phenomena: apparent motion and repetition blindness (RB). In RB, repeated items are more difficult to perceive than unrepeated items. Using displays in which two sets of alphanumeric characters streamed in opposite directions across a computer screen in apparent motion, we found increased RB for targets appearing within a single apparent motion stream, relative to targets in different apparent motion streams. The results are inconsistent with refractory period or memory retrieval accounts of RB and support the role of object tokens in both apparent motion and RB.

[1]  Josef Ternus,et al.  The problem of phenomenal identity. , 1938 .

[2]  M. Wertheimer.  Experimental studies on the seeing of motion , 1961 .

[3]  Thorne Shipley,et al.  Classics in Psychology , 1964 .

[4]  D. Navon,et al.  Irrelevance of figural identity for resolving ambiguities in apparent motion. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Elizabeth L Bjork,et al.  On the nature of input channels in visual processing. , 1977, Psychological review.

[6]  S. Anstis.  The perception of apparent movement. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[7]  Howard E. Egeth,et al.  Conceptual and perceptual components of interletter inhibition. , 1981 .

[8]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  The perception of apparent motion. , 1986, Scientific American.

[9]  Marc Green,et al.  What determines correspondence strength in apparent motion? , 1986, Vision Research.

[10]  N. Kanwisher.  Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation , 1987, Cognition.

[11]  L. Hochhaus,et al.  Different-case repetition still leads to perceptual blindness , 1988 .

[12]  A. Treisman.  Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[13]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[14]  Z. Pylyshyn.  The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model , 1989, Cognition.

[15]  Marc Green,et al.  Color correspondence in apparent motion , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  M. Mozer.  Types and tokens in visual letter perception. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  M. Potter,et al.  Repetition blindness: levels of processing. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Repetition blindness and illusory conjunctions: errors in binding visual types with visual tokens. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  D Bavelier,et al.  Visual and phonological codes in repetition blindness. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Objects, Attributes, and Visual Attention: Which, What, and Where , 1992 .

[21]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  M. Potter,et al.  Visual and phonological codes in repetition blindness , 1992 .

[23]  N Kanwisher,et al.  Determinants of repetition blindness. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. , 1994, Psychological review.

[25]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Types and tokens unscathed: a reply to Whittlesea, Dorken, and Podrouzek (1995) and Whittlesea and Podrouzek (1995). , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  H Pashler,et al.  Repetition blindness: perception or memory failure? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Spatial Repetition Blindness Is Modulated by Selective Attention to Color or Shape , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  B. W. Whittlesea,et al.  Repeated events in rapid lists: I. Encoding and representation. , 1995 .

[29]  Attention Based Visual Processes , 1996 .

[30]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Perceptual repetition blindness effects. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  M. Wertheimer,et al.  A source book of Gestalt psychology. , 1939 .

[33]  M. Chun,et al.  Types and tokens in visual processing: a double dissociation between the attentional blink and repetition blindness. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.