Lambeck calculus and substructural logics

To keep this paper in a reasonable size, I omit many interesting topics, e.g. Curry-Howard isomorphism, Abstract Categorial Grammars (an explicit application of the typed lambda-calculus as a grammar formalism, due to de Groote (2001)), proof nets (a graph-theoretic representation of proofs in multiplicative linear logics), modal categorial grammars, combinatory grammars, and learning theory. For some information on these topics see survey articles (Moortgat, 1997; Buszkowski, 1977, 2003b); also see the books cited above, the collection (Casadio et al, 2005), and two special issues of Studia Logica: 71.3 (2002) and 87.2-3 (2007). Section 2 presents different Lambek systems and their algebraic models. It also provides some basic linguistic interpretations of type logics. Section 3 introduces sequent systems of type logics, discusses cut elimination and its consequences, and shows some applications of sequent systems in proofs of fine completeness theorems. Section 4 is concerned with categorial grammars, based on different type logics; we show how certain proof-theoretic tools (cut elimination, normalization, interpolation) are used to establish basic properties of Lambek systems and grammars (decidability, generative capacity, complexity). Section 5 briefly outlines some ways in the opposite direction: some results on Lambek systems and grammars help to solve problems in substructural logics.

[1]  Mati Pentus,et al.  Lambek grammars are context free , 1993, [1993] Proceedings Eighth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science.

[2]  Nissim Francez,et al.  Commutation-Augmented Pregroup Grammars and Mildly Context-Sensitive Languages , 2007, Stud Logica.

[3]  J. Lambek The Mathematics of Sentence Structure , 1958 .

[4]  Hiroakira Ono,et al.  Logics without the contraction rule , 1985, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[5]  Wojciech Buszkowski Some Decision Problems in the Theory of Syntactic Categories , 1982, Math. Log. Q..

[6]  H. Wansing Substructural logics , 1996 .

[7]  Wojciech Buszkowski,et al.  Pregroup Grammars and Context-free Grammars , 2007 .

[8]  Wojciech Buszkowski,et al.  Infinitary Action Logic: Complexity, Models and Grammars , 2008, Stud Logica.

[9]  V. Michele Abrusci Phase Semantics and Sequent Calculus for Pure Noncommutative Classical Linear Propositional Logic , 1991, J. Symb. Log..

[10]  Vaughan R. Pratt,et al.  Action Logic and Pure Induction , 1990, JELIA.

[11]  Dirk Roorda,et al.  Resource Logics : Proof-Theoretical Investigations , 1991 .

[12]  Makoto Kanazawa The Lambek calculus enriched with additional connectives , 1992, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[13]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  Labelled Deductive Systems: Volume 1 , 1996 .

[14]  Maria Bulinska The Pentus Theorem for Lambek Calculus with Simple Nonlogical Axioms , 2005, Stud Logica.

[15]  Maciej Kandulski The equivalence of Nonassociative Lambek Categorial Grammars and Context-Free Grammars , 1988, Math. Log. Q..

[16]  Peter Jipsen,et al.  Residuated lattices: An algebraic glimpse at sub-structural logics , 2007 .

[17]  M. Moortgat Categorial Investigations: Logical and Linguistic Aspects of the Lambek Calculus , 1988 .

[18]  Anne Preller Linear Processing with Pregroups , 2007, Stud Logica.

[19]  Katarzyna Moroz A Savateev-Style Parsing Algorithm for Pregroup Grammars , 2009, FG.