SGRN: A Cas12a-driven Synthetic Gene Regulatory Network System

Gene regulatory networks, which control gene expression patterns in development and in response to stimuli, use regulatory logic modules to coordinate inputs and outputs. One example of a regulatory logic module is the gene regulatory cascade (GRC), where a series of transcription factor genes turn on in order. Synthetic biologists have derived artificial systems that encode regulatory rules, including GRCs. Furthermore, the development of single-cell approaches has enabled the discovery of gene regulatory modules in a variety of experimental settings. However, the tools available for validating these observations remain limited. Based on a synthetic GRC using DNA cutting-defective Cas9 (dCas9), we designed and implemented an alternative synthetic GRC utilizing DNA cutting-defective Cas12a (dCas12a). Comparing the ability of these two systems to express a fluorescent reporter, the dCas9 system was initially more active, while the dCas12a system was more streamlined. Investigating the influence of individual components of the systems identified nuclear localization as a major driver of differences in activity. Improving nuclear localization for the dCas12a system resulted in 1.5-fold more reporter-positive cells and a 15-fold increase in reporter intensity relative to the dCas9 system. We call this optimized system the “Synthetic Gene Regulatory Network” (SGRN, pronounced “sojourn”).

[1]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Synthetic multistability in mammalian cells , 2021, bioRxiv.

[2]  Zhendong Cao,et al.  High-performance CRISPR-Cas12a genome editing for combinatorial genetic screening , 2020, Nature Communications.

[3]  Timothy K. Lu,et al.  Scalable recombinase-based gene expression cascades , 2020, Nature Communications.

[4]  I. Wheeldon,et al.  Guide RNA engineering enables dual purpose CRISPR-Cpf1 for simultaneous gene editing and gene regulation in Yarrowia lipolytica. , 2020, ACS synthetic biology.

[5]  J. Hur,et al.  Enhancement of Target Specificity of CRISPR-Cas12a by Using a Chimeric DNA-RNA Guide , 2020, bioRxiv.

[6]  Carlo C. Campa,et al.  Multiplexed genome engineering by Cas12a and CRISPR arrays encoded on single transcripts , 2019, Nature Methods.

[7]  Lihua Julie Zhu,et al.  Enhanced Cas12a editing in mammalian cells and zebrafish , 2019, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  James R. Rybarski,et al.  Kinetic basis for DNA target specificity of CRISPR-Cas12a , 2018, bioRxiv.

[9]  Greg Finak,et al.  ggCyto: next generation open-source visualization software for cytometry , 2018, Bioinform..

[10]  P. Ingham,et al.  Ribozyme Mediated gRNA Generation for In Vitro and In Vivo CRISPR/Cas9 Mutagenesis , 2016, PloS one.

[11]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  Genome-wide specificities of CRISPR-Cas Cpf1 nucleases in human cells , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[12]  Kira S. Makarova,et al.  Crystal Structure of Cpf1 in Complex with Guide RNA and Target DNA , 2016, Cell.

[13]  David W. Nauen,et al.  Single-Cell RNA-Seq with Waterfall Reveals Molecular Cascades underlying Adult Neurogenesis. , 2015, Cell stem cell.

[14]  A. Regev,et al.  Cpf1 Is a Single RNA-Guided Endonuclease of a Class 2 CRISPR-Cas System , 2015, Cell.

[15]  S. Krishna,et al.  Effects of Four Different Regulatory Mechanisms on the Dynamics of Gene Regulatory Cascades , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[16]  Josef Spidlen,et al.  ISAC's Gating‐ML 2.0 data exchange standard for gating description , 2015, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[17]  L. Nissim,et al.  Multiplexed and programmable regulation of gene networks with an integrated RNA and CRISPR/Cas toolkit in human cells. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[18]  J. Keith Joung,et al.  Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  Emmanuelle Charpentier,et al.  The tracrRNA and Cas9 families of type II CRISPR-Cas immunity systems , 2013, RNA biology.

[20]  Wayne A Moore,et al.  Update for the logicle data scale including operational code implementations , 2012, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[21]  Bruce T. Lahn,et al.  Systematic Comparison of Constitutive Promoters and the Doxycycline-Inducible Promoter , 2010, PloS one.

[22]  Robert Gentleman,et al.  flowCore: a Bioconductor package for high throughput flow cytometry , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[23]  Robert Gentleman,et al.  Using flowViz to visualize flow cytometry data , 2008, Bioinform..

[24]  L. Hood,et al.  A Genomic Regulatory Network for Development , 2002, Science.

[25]  U. Alon,et al.  Ordering Genes in a Flagella Pathway by Analysis of Expression Kinetics from Living Bacteria , 2001, Science.

[26]  D J Segal,et al.  Toward controlling gene expression at will: specific regulation of the erbB-2/HER-2 promoter by using polydactyl zinc finger proteins constructed from modular building blocks. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  C. Nüsslein-Volhard,et al.  The origin of pattern and polarity in the Drosophila embryo , 1992, Cell.

[28]  S. Ho,et al.  Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction. , 1989, Gene.

[29]  A. Cornish-Bowden.  Nomenclature for incompletely specified bases in nucleic acid sequences: recommendations 1984. , 1985, Nucleic acids research.

[30]  B. Glick,et al.  Rapidly maturing variants of the Discosoma red fluorescent protein (DsRed) , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[31]  L. Kedes,et al.  Nomenclature for incompletely specified bases in nucleic acid sequences. Recommendations 1984. Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry (NC-IUB). , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.