Timing of Intravenous Administration Set Changes: A Systematic Review
暂无分享,去创建一个
M. Wallen | D. Gillies | L. O'Riordan | A. Morrison | K. Rankin | S. Nagy
[1] Didier Pittet,et al. Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings. Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HIPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. , 2002, American journal of infection control.
[2] L. Mermel,et al. Guidelines for the Management of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections , 2001, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.
[3] I. Raad,et al. Optimal Frequency of Changing Intravenous Administration Sets: Is It Safe to Prolong Use Beyond 72 Hours? , 2001, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.
[4] M. Corey,et al. A Randomized Trial of 72- Versus 24-Hour Intravenous Tubing Set Changes in Newborns Receiving Lipid Therapy , 1999, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.
[5] J. Van Aerde,et al. Changing parenteral nutrition administration sets every 24 h versus every 48 h in newborn infants. , 1999, Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie.
[6] L. Jensen,et al. Changing i.v. administration sets: is 48 versus 24 hours safe for neutropenic patients with cancer? , 1998, Oncology Nursing Forum.
[7] D. Merante,et al. A prospective study evaluating the effects of extending total parenteral nutrition line changes to 72 hours. , 1995, Journal of Intravenous Nursing.
[8] M. Weiman. Changing central venous catheter lines: evaluation of a modification to clinical practice. , 1992, Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing.
[9] Cohen Dm. A replication study: analysis of bacterial contamination of intravenous administration sets in use for 72 hours. , 1989 .
[10] D. Cohen. A replication study: analysis of bacterial contamination of intravenous administration sets in use for 72 hours. , 1989, The Journal of the New York State Nurses' Association.
[11] D. Maki,et al. Prospective study of replacing administration sets for intravenous therapy at 48- vs 72-hour intervals. 72 hours is safe and cost-effective. , 1987, JAMA.
[12] D. Snydman,et al. Intravenous Tubing Containing Burettes Can Be Safely Changed at 72 Hour Intervals , 1987, Infection Control.
[13] T. Højbjerg,et al. Contamination of intravenous infusion systems--the effect of changing administration sets. , 1986, The Journal of hospital infection.
[14] S. Gallagher,et al. Microbial growth patterns in a total parenteral nutrition formulation containing lipid emulsion. , 1986, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.
[15] M. F. Sierra,et al. The Relationship Between Intravenous Fluid Contamination and the Frequency of Tubing Replacement , 1985, Infection Control.
[16] K. Kudsk,et al. Op-Site dressing study: a prospective randomized study evaluating povidone iodine ointment and extension set changes with 7-day Op-Site dressings applied to total parenteral nutrition subclavian sites. , 1985, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.
[17] E. Jaurrieta,et al. A randomized trial on the effect of tubing changes on hub contamination and catheter sepsis during parenteral nutrition. , 1985, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.
[18] S. Gorman,et al. GROWTH OF MICROORGANISMS IN TOTAL PARENTERAL NUTRITION MIXTURES AND RELATED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS , 1985, Journal of clinical and hospital pharmacy.
[19] D. Snydman,et al. Intravenous tubing with burettes can be safely changed at 48-hour intervals. , 1984, JAMA.
[20] D. Maki,et al. Safety of changing intravenous delivery systems at longer than 24-hour intervals. , 1979, Annals of internal medicine.
[21] A. Buxton,et al. Contamination of intravenous infusion fluid: effects of changing administration sets. , 1979, Annals of internal medicine.
[22] W. Schaffner,et al. Microbiol growth in lipid emulsions used in parenteral nutrition. , 1975, Archives of surgery.