Timing of Intravenous Administration Set Changes: A Systematic Review

Abstract Objective: To determine the optimal time interval for the routine replacement of intravenous administration sets when crystalloids or parenteral nutrition are administered via a central or peripheral catheter in an acute care setting. Design: Systematic review of all randomized or systematically allocated controlled trials addressing the frequency of replacing intravenous administration sets. Methods: The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (June 2001) and the Ovid databases (Medline, CINAHL, and CancerLit-July 2001) were searched. Bibliographies, relevant conference proceedings, and any product information were also checked for references. Results: Eighteen studies were selected for review. The 12 included studies were separated into 3 intravenous administration set change comparisons; 24 hours versus 48 hours or more; 48 hours versus 72 hours or more; and 72 hours versus 96 hours or more. There was good evidence that changing intravenous administration sets every 72 hours or more does not increase the risk of infusate-related bloodstream infection (BSI) in patients with central or peripheral catheters and a fair level of evidence that it does not increase the risk of catheter-related BSI. There were insufficient data regarding the incidence of BSI among patients receiving parenteral nutrition, particularly lipid-containing parenteral nutrition. Conclusions: It appears that intravenous administration sets containing crystalloids can be changed in patients with central or peripheral catheters every 72 hours or more without increasing the risk of BSI. However, it is not possible to conclude that intravenous administration sets containing parenteral nutrition, particularly lipid-containing parenteral nutrition, can be changed at this interval.

[1]  Didier Pittet,et al.  Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings. Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HIPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. , 2002, American journal of infection control.

[2]  L. Mermel,et al.  Guidelines for the Management of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections , 2001, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[3]  I. Raad,et al.  Optimal Frequency of Changing Intravenous Administration Sets: Is It Safe to Prolong Use Beyond 72 Hours? , 2001, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[4]  M. Corey,et al.  A Randomized Trial of 72- Versus 24-Hour Intravenous Tubing Set Changes in Newborns Receiving Lipid Therapy , 1999, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[5]  J. Van Aerde,et al.  Changing parenteral nutrition administration sets every 24 h versus every 48 h in newborn infants. , 1999, Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie.

[6]  L. Jensen,et al.  Changing i.v. administration sets: is 48 versus 24 hours safe for neutropenic patients with cancer? , 1998, Oncology Nursing Forum.

[7]  D. Merante,et al.  A prospective study evaluating the effects of extending total parenteral nutrition line changes to 72 hours. , 1995, Journal of Intravenous Nursing.

[8]  M. Weiman Changing central venous catheter lines: evaluation of a modification to clinical practice. , 1992, Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing.

[9]  Cohen Dm A replication study: analysis of bacterial contamination of intravenous administration sets in use for 72 hours. , 1989 .

[10]  D. Cohen A replication study: analysis of bacterial contamination of intravenous administration sets in use for 72 hours. , 1989, The Journal of the New York State Nurses' Association.

[11]  D. Maki,et al.  Prospective study of replacing administration sets for intravenous therapy at 48- vs 72-hour intervals. 72 hours is safe and cost-effective. , 1987, JAMA.

[12]  D. Snydman,et al.  Intravenous Tubing Containing Burettes Can Be Safely Changed at 72 Hour Intervals , 1987, Infection Control.

[13]  T. Højbjerg,et al.  Contamination of intravenous infusion systems--the effect of changing administration sets. , 1986, The Journal of hospital infection.

[14]  S. Gallagher,et al.  Microbial growth patterns in a total parenteral nutrition formulation containing lipid emulsion. , 1986, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[15]  M. F. Sierra,et al.  The Relationship Between Intravenous Fluid Contamination and the Frequency of Tubing Replacement , 1985, Infection Control.

[16]  K. Kudsk,et al.  Op-Site dressing study: a prospective randomized study evaluating povidone iodine ointment and extension set changes with 7-day Op-Site dressings applied to total parenteral nutrition subclavian sites. , 1985, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[17]  E. Jaurrieta,et al.  A randomized trial on the effect of tubing changes on hub contamination and catheter sepsis during parenteral nutrition. , 1985, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[18]  S. Gorman,et al.  GROWTH OF MICROORGANISMS IN TOTAL PARENTERAL NUTRITION MIXTURES AND RELATED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS , 1985, Journal of clinical and hospital pharmacy.

[19]  D. Snydman,et al.  Intravenous tubing with burettes can be safely changed at 48-hour intervals. , 1984, JAMA.

[20]  D. Maki,et al.  Safety of changing intravenous delivery systems at longer than 24-hour intervals. , 1979, Annals of internal medicine.

[21]  A. Buxton,et al.  Contamination of intravenous infusion fluid: effects of changing administration sets. , 1979, Annals of internal medicine.

[22]  W. Schaffner,et al.  Microbiol growth in lipid emulsions used in parenteral nutrition. , 1975, Archives of surgery.