Clinical and Radiological Outcomes With the Charité™ Artificial Disc: A 10-Year Minimum Follow-Up

This is the first report of clinical and radiologic outcomes for the CHARITÉ™ artificial disc with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. A total of 107 patients indicated for total lumbar disc replacement were implanted with the CHARITÉ™ prosthesis. Of these 107, 100 were followed for a minimum of 10 years (range 10-13.4 years). A total of 147 prostheses were implanted with 54 one-level and 45 two-level procedures and 1 three-level procedure. The prostheses were placed through a standard anterior retroperitoneal approach. Clinically, 62% had an excellent outcome, 28% had a good outcome, and 10% had a poor outcome. Of the 95 eligible to return to work, 88 (91.5%) either returned to the same job as prior to surgery or a different job. These included 63.2% (12) of those working in heavy labor employment returning to the same job. Mean flexion/extension motion was 10.3° for all levels (12.0° at L3-L4, 9.6° at L4-L5, 9.2° at L5-S1). Mean lateral motion was 5.4°. In the sagittal plane, 9 (6.1%) were anterior of geometric center, 50 (34.0%) were centered, and 88 (59.9%) were posterior of center. In the frontal plane, 110 (75%) were centered, and 37 (25%) were noted to be lateral to center. Slight subsidence was observed in two patients, but they did not require further surgery. No subluxation of the prostheses and no cases of spontaneous arthrodesis were identified. There was one case of disc height loss of 1 mm. Five patients required a secondary posterior arthrodesis. A good or excellent clinical outcome rate of 90% and a return to work rate of 91.5% compare favorably with results described in the literature for fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease. With a minimum follow-up of 10 years, the CHARITÉ™ artificial disc demonstrated excellent flexion/extension and lateral range of motion with no significant complications.

[1]  Jeffrey C. Wang,et al.  Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  M. Pfeiffer,et al.  Standardized evaluation of long-term results after anterior lumbar interbody fusion , 2004, European Spine Journal.

[3]  P. Eysel,et al.  Clinical efficacy of pedicle instrumentation and posterolateral fusion in the symptomatic degenerative lumbar spine , 2004, European Spine Journal.

[4]  D. Grob,et al.  Circumferential fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spinet , 2004, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[5]  Warren D. Yu,et al.  Perioperative Complications of Threaded Cylindrical Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices: Anterior Versus Posterior Approach , 2003, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[6]  D. Spengler,et al.  The Impact of Adjacent Level Disc Degeneration on Health Status Outcomes Following Lumbar Fusion , 2003, Spine.

[7]  Bryan W Cunningham,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Total Disc Replacement Arthroplasty: An In Vitro Human Cadaveric Model , 2003, Spine.

[8]  B. Cunningham,et al.  General Principles of Total Disc Replacement Arthroplasty: Seventeen Cases in a Nonhuman Primate Model , 2003, Spine.

[9]  Patrick Tropiano,et al.  Long-Term Flexion-Extension Range of Motion of the Prodisc Total Disc Replacement , 2003, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[10]  Sang-Ho Lee,et al.  Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Disc Disease Using a Minimally Invasive B-Twin Expandable Spinal Spacer: A Multicenter Study , 2003, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[11]  Philippe Gillet,et al.  The Fate of the Adjacent Motion Segments After Lumbar Fusion , 2003, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[12]  Jie Zhao,et al.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using one diagonal fusion cage with transpedicular screw/rod fixation , 2003, European Spine Journal.

[13]  Huilin Yang,et al.  Complications associated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion using Bagby and Kuslich method for treatment of spondylolisthesis. , 2003, Chinese medical journal.

[14]  Jie Zhao,et al.  One Versus Two BAK Fusion Cages in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion to L4–L5 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Randomized, Controlled Prospective Study in 25 Patients With Minimum Two-Year Follow-up , 2002, Spine.

[15]  R. Balderston,et al.  Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 , 2002, Spine.

[16]  S. Blumenthal,et al.  Artificial disc: preliminary results of a prospective study in the United States , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[17]  Helmut D. Link,et al.  History, design and biomechanics of the LINK SB Charité artificial disc , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[18]  S. Madan,et al.  Outcome of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Posterolateral Fusion for Spondylolytic Spondylolisthesis , 2002, Spine.

[19]  T. Zdeblick,et al.  A Prospective Comparison of Surgical Approach for Anterior L4–L5 Fusion: Laparoscopic Versus Mini Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion , 2000, Spine.

[20]  Y. Shimada,et al.  Outcome of One-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis and Postoperative Intervertebral Disc Degeneration Adjacent to the Fusion , 2000, Spine.

[21]  J. Brantigan,et al.  Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system: two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption clinical trial. , 2000, Spine.

[22]  J. van Limbeek,et al.  Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with threaded fusion cages and autologous bone grafts , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[23]  B. Subach,et al.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion: indications, techniques, and results. , 2000, Clinical neurosurgery.

[24]  W C Lauerman,et al.  A randomized prospective study of posterolateral lumbar fusion. Outcomes with and without pedicle screw instrumentation. , 1999, Spine.

[25]  T. Whitecloud,et al.  Degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine treated with intervertebral titanium cages and posterior instrumentation for circumferential fusion. , 1998, Journal of spinal disorders.

[26]  S. Gertzbein,et al.  Analysis of circumferential lumbar fusion outcome in the treatment of degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine. , 1998, Journal of spinal disorders.

[27]  S. Gertzbein,et al.  Pseudarthrosis of the Lumbar Spine: Outcome After Circumferential Fusion , 1998, Spine.

[28]  R. Fraser,et al.  Instrumented Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion: Results and Comparison With Anterior Interbody Fusion , 1998, Spine.

[29]  P. Renton,et al.  Simultaneous combined anterior and posterior lumbar fusion with femoral cortical allograft , 1998, European Spine Journal.

[30]  S. Eiskjær,et al.  1997 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: The Effect of Pedicle Screw Instrumentation on Functional Outcome and Fusion Rates in Posterolateral Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study , 1997, Spine.

[31]  M. Aebi,et al.  Adult spondylolisthesis treated with posterolateral lumbar fusion and pedicular instrumentation with AO DC plates. , 1997, Journal of spinal disorders.

[32]  W. Skalli,et al.  Intervertebral Disc Prosthesis: Results and Prospects for the Year 2000 , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[33]  P. Guigui,et al.  [Long-term outcome at adjacent levels of lumbar arthrodesis]. , 1997, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur.

[34]  Y. Yun,et al.  Posterior pedicular screw instrumentation and anterior interbody fusion in adult lumbar spondylolysis or grade I spondylolisthesis with segmental instability. , 1996, Journal of spinal disorders.

[35]  K. Herrlin,et al.  Posterolateral lumbar fusion. Outcome of 71 consecutive operations after 4 (2-7) years. , 1994, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[36]  D. E. Swartz,et al.  Posterolateral lumbar and lumbosacral fusion with and without pedicle screw internal fixation. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[37]  J. O'Brien,et al.  Simultaneous Combined Anterior and Posterior Fusion, An Independent Analysis of A Treatment for the Disabled Low‐Back Pain Patient , 1990, Spine.

[38]  T. C. Howard,et al.  Roentgenographic Evaluation of Lumbar Spine Flexion‐Extension in Asymptomatic Individuals , 1989, Spine.

[39]  A Plamondon,et al.  Application of a Stereoradiographic Method for the Study of Intervertebral Motion , 1988, Spine.

[40]  A. Deburge,et al.  [Long-term results of the surgical treatment of lumbar stenosis]. , 1985, Revue du rhumatisme et des maladies osteo-articulaires.

[41]  M. Pearcy,et al.  Axial rotation and lateral bending in the normal lumbar spine measured by three-dimensional radiography. , 1984, Spine.