Pilot Trial of Selecting Molecularly Guided Therapy for Patients with Non–V600 BRAF-Mutant Metastatic Melanoma: Experience of the SU2C/MRA Melanoma Dream Team

Targeted therapies and immunotherapies have led to significant improvements in the treatment of advanced cancers, including metastatic melanoma. However, new strategies are desperately needed to overcome therapeutic resistance to these agents, as well as to identify effective treatment approaches for cancer patients that fall outside major targetable mutational subtypes (e.g., non–V600 BRAF melanoma). One such strategy is to extend the paradigm of individually tailored, molecularly targeted therapy into a broader spectrum of melanoma patients, particularly those bearing tumors without commonly recognized therapeutic targets, as well as having failed or were ineligible for immunotherapy. In this nontreatment pilot study, next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies were utilized, including whole genome and whole transcriptome sequencing, to identify molecular aberrations in patients with non–V600 BRAF metastatic melanoma. This information was then rationally matched to an appropriate clinical treatment from a defined pharmacopeia. Five patients with advanced non–V600 BRAF metastatic melanoma were enrolled. We demonstrated successful performance of the following during a clinically relevant time period: patient tumor biopsy, quality DNA/RNA extraction, DNA/RNA-based sequencing for gene expression analysis, analysis utilizing a series of data integration methodologies, report generation, and tumor board review with formulated treatment plan. Streamlining measures were conducted based on the experiences of enrolling, collecting specimens, and analyzing the molecular signatures of patients. We demonstrated the feasibility of using NGS to identify molecular aberrations and generate an individualized treatment plan in this patient population. A randomized treatment study utilizing lessons learned from the conduct of this pilot study is currently underway. Mol Cancer Ther; 14(8); 1962–71. ©2015 AACR.

[1]  G. Linette,et al.  Nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab in untreated melanoma. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Theresa Zhang,et al.  Personalized genomic analyses for cancer mutation discovery and interpretation , 2015, Science Translational Medicine.

[3]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  J. Wolchok,et al.  Survival, response duration, and activity by BRAF mutation (MT) status of nivolumab (NIVO, anti-PD-1, BMS-936558, ONO-4538) and ipilimumab (IPI) concurrent therapy in advanced melanoma (MEL). , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  J. Wolchok,et al.  Efficacy and safety of the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody MK-3475 in 411 patients (pts) with melanoma (MEL). , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  J. Sosman,et al.  A phase 1b/2 study of LEE011 in combination with binimetinib (MEK162) in patients with NRAS-mutant melanoma: Early encouraging clinical activity. , 2014 .

[7]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Discovery and saturation analysis of cancer genes across 21 tumor types , 2014, Nature.

[8]  F. André,et al.  The genetic complexity of common cancers and the promise of personalized medicine: is there any hope? , 2014, The Journal of pathology.

[9]  P. Stephens,et al.  BRAF Fusions Define a Distinct Molecular Subset of Melanomas with Potential Sensitivity to MEK Inhibition , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[10]  Winnie S. Liang,et al.  A Pilot Study Using Next-Generation Sequencing in Advanced Cancers: Feasibility and Challenges , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  Levi A Garraway,et al.  Genomics-driven oncology: framework for an emerging paradigm. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  C. Berking,et al.  MEK162 for patients with advanced melanoma harbouring NRAS or Val600 BRAF mutations: a non-randomised, open-label phase 2 study. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[13]  Razelle Kurzrock,et al.  Personalized Medicine in a Phase I Clinical Trials Program: The MD Anderson Cancer Center Initiative , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[14]  A. Sivachenko,et al.  A Landscape of Driver Mutations in Melanoma , 2012, Cell.

[15]  Matthew J. Davis,et al.  Exome sequencing identifies recurrent somatic RAC1 mutations in melanoma , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[16]  William Pao,et al.  Routine Multiplex Mutational Profiling of Melanomas Enables Enrollment in Genotype-Driven Therapeutic Trials , 2012, PloS one.

[17]  T. Fennell,et al.  Melanoma genome sequencing reveals frequent PREX2 mutations , 2012, Nature.

[18]  M. Herlyn New dream team for melanoma therapy , 2012, Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research.

[19]  Lee T. Sam,et al.  Personalized Oncology Through Integrative High-Throughput Sequencing: A Pilot Study , 2011, Science Translational Medicine.

[20]  C. Robert,et al.  New drugs in melanoma: it's a whole new world. , 2011, European journal of cancer.

[21]  A. Hauschild,et al.  Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  R. Scolyer,et al.  BRAF mutations in cutaneous melanoma are independently associated with age, anatomic site of the primary tumor, and the degree of solar elastosis at the primary tumor site , 2011, Pigment cell & melanoma research.

[23]  G. Mann,et al.  Prognostic and clinicopathologic associations of oncogenic BRAF in metastatic melanoma. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  Michael Bittner,et al.  Pilot study using molecular profiling of patients' tumors to find potential targets and select treatments for their refractory cancers. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  K. Flaherty,et al.  Inhibition of mutated, activated BRAF in metastatic melanoma. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  R. Kurzrock,et al.  Cancer: the road to Amiens. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  Joshua M. Korn,et al.  Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways , 2008, Nature.

[29]  David S. Wishart,et al.  DrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[30]  H. Heng Cancer genome sequencing: the challenges ahead. , 2007, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[31]  Sieger Leenstra,et al.  Novel somatic and germline mutations in cancer candidate genes in glioblastoma, melanoma, and pancreatic carcinoma. , 2007, Cancer research.

[32]  R. Kurzrock,et al.  Uncommon tumors and exceptional therapies: paradox or paradigm? , 2007, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[33]  John P. Overington,et al.  How many drug targets are there? , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[34]  J. Fridlyand,et al.  Distinct sets of genetic alterations in melanoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  G. Batist,et al.  Use of statins and the risk of death in patients with prostate cancer. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.