Characterization of the stress sensitivity of pores for different rank coals by nuclear magnetic resonance

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments of stress sensitivity on the pore and fracture systems of coal samples with different ranks were performed. Pore compressibility was calculated based on the NMR results. The relationship between pore compressibility and effective stress was discussed and a mathematical model for pore compressibility was developed to describe the experimental data. The experimental results showed different characteristics of NMR T2 distributions, which were in good accordance to the diverse pore and fracture structures for the different rank coals. Medium and high rank coals have more developed pore space for adsorption, and the main peak of T2 spectra locate at the low T2 value section; while for the low rank coals, all the pores and fractures are well developed, with peaks corresponding to them are all obvious on the T2 spectra. Furthermore, the pore spaces showed different stress sensitivity for different rank coals. For low rank coals, seepage space changes dramatically as the confining pressure changes, and seepage space is the main controlling factor of stress sensitivity. As the metamorphism degree increasing, adsorption space becomes dominant in the pore and fracture structure of coals. Thus adsorption space in high and medium rank coals decreases significantly with the increase of the confining pressure, and stress sensitivity is controlled by their adsorption space, as suggested by the experimental results. The pore compressibility of the coals decreases with confining pressure increase and the experimental data can be accurately described by the new developed stress dependant pore compressibility model.

[1]  R. A. Schraufnagel,et al.  Shrinkage of coal matrix with release of gas and its impact on permeability of coal , 1990 .

[2]  X. Su,et al.  The characteristics and origins of cleat in coal from Western North China , 2001 .

[3]  J. Howard,et al.  Application of NMR Logging to Reservoir Characterization of Low-Resistivity Sands in the Gulf of Mexico1 , 1999 .

[4]  L. Connell,et al.  A theoretical model for gas adsorption-induced coal swelling , 2007 .

[5]  W. E. Kenyon,et al.  Petrophysical Principles of Applications of NMR Logging , 1997 .

[6]  Ian D. Palmer,et al.  How Permeability Depends on Stress and Pore Pressure in Coalbeds: A New Model , 1998 .

[7]  Yiwen Ju,et al.  New research progress on the ultrastructure of tectonically deformed coals , 2009 .

[8]  Zhihua Liu,et al.  Fractal characterization of seepage-pores of coals from China: An investigation on permeability of coals , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[9]  Zhaoping Meng,et al.  In-situ stress, pore pressure and stress-dependent permeability in the Southern Qinshui Basin , 2011 .

[10]  A. C. Bumb,et al.  Stress-Dependent Permeability and Porosity of Coal , 1988 .

[11]  Luke D. Connell,et al.  Laboratory characterisation of coal reservoir permeability for primary and enhanced coalbed methane recovery , 2010 .

[12]  Kevin P. Munn,et al.  A NMR technique for the analysis of pore structure: Numerical inversion of relaxation measurements , 1987 .

[13]  Junqian Li,et al.  Advanced characterization of pores and fractures in coals by nuclear magnetic resonance and X-ray computed tomography , 2010 .

[14]  Sevket Durucan,et al.  A model for changes in coalbed permeability during primary and enhanced methane, recovery , 2005 .

[15]  Luke D. Connell,et al.  Modelling of anisotropic coal swelling and its impact on permeability behaviour for primary and enhanced coalbed methane recovery , 2011 .

[16]  Yanbin Yao,et al.  Coal reservoir characteristics and coalbed methane resource assessment in Huainan and Huaibei coalfields, Southern North China , 2009 .

[17]  Jonny Rutqvist,et al.  A New Coal-Permeability Model: Internal Swelling Stress and Fracture–Matrix Interaction , 2010 .

[18]  J. P. Seidle,et al.  Application of Matchstick Geometry To Stress Dependent Permeability in Coals , 1992 .

[19]  R. Chalaturnyk,et al.  Permeability and porosity models considering anisotropy and discontinuity of coalbeds and application in coupled simulation , 2010 .

[20]  Hao Xu,et al.  Porosity and Permeability Models for Coals Using Low-Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance , 2012 .

[21]  Robert W. Zimmerman,et al.  Compressibility of porous rocks , 1986 .

[22]  W. H. Somerton,et al.  Effect of stress on permeability of coal , 1975 .

[23]  W. E. Kenyon,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance as a petrophysical measurement , 1992 .

[24]  K. Sing,et al.  Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Provisional) , 1982 .

[25]  Hao Xu,et al.  Analysis of pore system model and physical property of coal reservoir in the Qinshui Basin , 2005 .

[26]  Sevket Durucan,et al.  Drawdown Induced Changes in Permeability of Coalbeds: A New Interpretation of the Reservoir Response to Primary Recovery , 2004 .

[27]  A. C. Bumb,et al.  Stress-Dependent Permeability and Porosity of Coal and Other Geologic Formations , 1988 .

[28]  D. Tang,et al.  Petrophysical characterization of coals by low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) , 2010 .

[29]  Hao Xu,et al.  Dynamic variation effects of coal permeability during the coalbed methane development process in the Qinshui Basin, China , 2012 .

[30]  Sevket Durucan,et al.  Exponential Growth in San Juan Basin Fruitland Coalbed Permeability With Reservoir Drawdown—Model Match and New Insights , 2009 .

[31]  L. Connell,et al.  Modelling permeability for coal reservoirs: A review of analytical models and testing data , 2012 .

[32]  Roger Beckie,et al.  Flow of Coal-Bed Methane to a Gallery , 2000 .

[33]  Zhongwei Chen,et al.  Laboratory Study of Gas Permeability and Cleat Compressibility for CBM/ECBM in Chinese Coals , 2012 .