Development of process model for Serbian cadastre

Abstract Identifying the processes in the cadastre enables understanding the principles on which the cadastre works. Processes in cadastre define the way how the cadastre manages information and what are the prerequisites for the data to be stored in the appropriate data structure. In order to explicitly specify cadastral procedures and workflows to support their automatization, we developed a process model for Serbian cadastre. The main reason for developing the process model is to ensure the framework which will provide possible integration and interoperability with other systems outside traditional cadastral system and between cadastral subsystems themselves. The process model is based on hierarchical decomposition of two basic groups of processes: processes for changing cadastral data and processes for displaying cadastral data. Each group of processes is further decomposed step by step until the workflow of a single process is shown. The developed process model is an abstract model, i.e. it is independent of the implementation. However, in order to instantiate such process model, it is necessary to provide binding of the abstract process model to its underlying implementation. Cadastral registration of spatial units may be beneficial for activities that relay on land administration, such as taxation, spatial planning, obtaining a building permit or legalization of buildings. This relation to the processes under jurisdiction of other organizations justifies the use of cadastral process model and its implementation into SOA environment. Traditionally, cadastral processes include alphanumeric data and 2D spatial data on cadastral maps that contain 2D borders of parcels and buildings. However, recent advancements in 3D technology bring the opportunity to enhance such processes with 3D information. In particular, the aim is to extend current 2D process model to support data maintenance and transactions in the upgrade towards 3D cadastre. Therefore, these 3D data supported workflows are introduced to the process model. For the processes that include 3D information the choice has to be made which specifications will be used and how representations of 3D spatial units will be resolved. In this paper, we first develop an abstract process model of Serbian cadastre. After that, we extend the process model to include 3D information, discuss the options for using the encodings of 3D spatial units (legal spaces) and select buildingSMART openBIM IFC standard for this purpose.

[1]  Miro Govedarica,et al.  Integration of modern remote sensing technologies for faster utility mapping and data extraction , 2015 .

[2]  P. V. Oosterom,et al.  The possibilities of using CityGML for 3D representation of buildings in the cadastre , 2011 .

[3]  R. Roschlaub,et al.  AN INSPIRE-KONFORM 3D BUILDING MODEL OF BAVARIA USING CADASTRE INFORMATION, LIDAR AND IMAGE MATCHING , 2016 .

[4]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  The New Industrial Engineering: Information Technology and Business Process Redesign , 2011 .

[5]  Mohamed El-Mekawy,et al.  Integration of 3D Cadastre, 3D Property Formation and BIM in Sweden , 2014 .

[6]  Filip Biljecki,et al.  Registration of Multi-Level Property Rights in 3D in The Netherlands: Two Cases and Next Steps in Further Implementation , 2017, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[7]  P.J.M. van Oosterom,et al.  A Taxonomy of Spatial Units in a Mixed 2D and 3D Cadastral Database , 2015 .

[8]  Tf Thomas Krijnen,et al.  Using the BIM collaboration format in a server based workflow , 2014 .

[9]  Miro Govedarica,et al.  Towards 3D Cadastre in Serbia: Development of Serbian Cadastral Domain Model , 2017, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[10]  J. Stoter,et al.  Integration of land administration domain model with CityGML for 3D Cadastre , 2014 .

[11]  Abbas Rajabifard,et al.  Extending a BIM-based data model to support 3D digital management of complex ownership spaces , 2017, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[12]  Erik Stubkjær,et al.  A socio-technical analysis of cadastral systems , 2007 .

[13]  Ruth Sara Aguilar-Savén,et al.  Business process modelling: Review and framework , 2004 .

[14]  Mojca Kosmatin Fras,et al.  Transition from 2D to 3D real property cadastre: The case of the Slovenian cadastre , 2017, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[16]  Umit Isikdag,et al.  Enhanced Building Information Models: Using IoT Services and Integration Patterns , 2015 .

[17]  Peter van Oosterom,et al.  LandXML Encoding of Mixed 2D and 3D Survey Plans with Multi-Level Topology , 2017, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[18]  Miro Govedarica,et al.  3D Visualization of Urban Area Using Lidar Technology and CityGML , 2017 .

[19]  Shen Ying,et al.  Chapter 2. Initial Registration of 3D Parcels , 2018 .

[20]  Abbas Rajabifard,et al.  Building Information Modelling for High‐rise Land Administration , 2017, Trans. GIS.

[21]  Abbas Rajabifard,et al.  Towards 3D-enabled urban land administration: strategic lessons from the BIM initiative in Singapore , 2016 .

[22]  Abbas Rajabifard,et al.  Assessing Performance of Three BIM-Based Views of Buildings for Communication and Management of Vertically Stratified Legal Interests , 2017, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[23]  Peter van Oosterom,et al.  Overview of the Croatian Land Administration System and the Possibilities for Its Upgrade to 3D by Existing Data , 2017, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[24]  Jarosław Bydłosz,et al.  The application of the Land Administration Domain Model in building a country profile for the Polish cadastre , 2015 .

[25]  Sisi Zlatanova,et al.  Supporting Indoor Navigation Using Access Rights to Spaces Based on Combined Use of IndoorGML and LADM Models , 2017, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[26]  Karel Janecka,et al.  A Country Profile of the Czech Republic Based on an LADM for the Development of a 3D Cadastre , 2017, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[27]  P.J.M. van Oosterom,et al.  A Conceptual Model Supporting a Range of 3D Parcel Representations Through all Stages: Data Capture, Transfer and Storage , 2016 .

[28]  Miodrag Roić,et al.  Initial Registration of 3D Parcels , 2016 .

[29]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  Processes in a cadastre , 2004, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[30]  Sisi Zlatanova,et al.  Indoor Abstract Spaces: Linking IndoorGML and LADM , 2016 .

[31]  Richard J. Mayer,et al.  IDEF Family of Methods for Concurrent Engineering and Business Re-engineering Applications , 1994 .

[32]  Rohan Bennett,et al.  The land administration domain model , 2015 .

[33]  Thomas Krijnen,et al.  Working with Open BIM Standards to Source Legal Spaces for a 3D Cadastre , 2017, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[34]  S. Karki,et al.  Initial analysis of the second FIG 3D cadastres questionnaire: Status in 2014 and expectations for 2018 , 2014 .

[35]  P.J.M. van Oosterom,et al.  Towards a New Working Item Proposal for Edition II of LADM , 2018 .

[36]  Abbas Rajabifard,et al.  Towards integration of 3D legal and physical objects in cadastral data models , 2013 .