Optimization of electrical stimulation parameters for enhanced cell proliferation on biomaterial surfaces.

From the point of view of biocompatibility of bone analog materials, cell-material interaction is of fundamental importance. In this article, we report the effect of pulse electric field stimulation on cell-material interaction by analyzing cellular functionality and viability. An in-house fabricated pulse electric field setup was used for the application of electric field during cell culture experiments. To optimize voltage/electric field, the first set of exploratory experiments was conducted with varying field strength at fixed frequency, and subsequently, the frequency of the electrical stimulation was varied to study its influence on the proliferation of L929 mouse fibroblast cells on gelatin-coated control disc. Subsequently, L929 cells were cultured on hydroxyapatite (HA) and HA-40 wt % BaTiO₃ composite. Cell-cultured samples were analyzed qualitatively as well as quantitatively using fluorescence microscope and scanning electron microscope. It has been demonstrated that due to the application of electric field during the cell culture experiment, the cell proliferation and the cell spreading on the surface of the biomaterials were enhanced within a narrow window of voltage/frequency of electrical stimulation. At lower field intensities, the energy density is quite low and increases parabolically with field strength. There is no significant increase in the temperature (ΔT ~10⁻⁵ K) of the medium due to the application of short duration pulse electric field. This led us to believe that electric field with appropriate strength and duration can enhance the cell-material interaction.

[1]  Iseult Lynch,et al.  Are there generic mechanisms governing interactions between nanoparticles and cells? Epitope mapping the outer layer of the protein-material interface , 2007 .

[2]  K. Schoenbach,et al.  Self-consistent simulations of electroporation dynamics in biological cells subjected to ultrashort electrical pulses. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  C. Hung,et al.  Roles of microtubules, cell polarity and adhesion in electric-field-mediated motility of 3T3 fibroblasts , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[4]  K. Sakaguchi,et al.  Basic and clinical evaluation of the measurement of bone resonant frequency , 2006, Calcified Tissue International.

[5]  D. Miklavčič,et al.  Modified cell proliferation due to electrical currents , 1992, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[6]  F. Grinnell,et al.  Fibroblast adhesion to fibrinogen and fibrin substrata: Requirement for cold-insoluble globulin (plasma fibronectin) , 1980, Cell.

[7]  M. S. Cooper,et al.  Perpendicular orientation and directional migration of amphibian neural crest cells in dc electrical fields. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Zhiqing Chen,et al.  Effects of surface microstructure of hydroxyapatite on protein adsorption and biological performance of osteoblasts , 2008 .

[9]  Juergen F Kolb,et al.  Nanosecond pulsed electric field generators for the study of subcellular effects , 2006, Bioelectromagnetics.

[10]  J. Aubin,et al.  Osteoclasts and osteoblasts migrate in opposite directions in response to a constant electrical field , 1986, Journal of cellular physiology.

[11]  N G Maroudas,et al.  Adhesion and spreading of cells on charged surfaces. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  Dimitris J. Panagopoulos,et al.  A mechanism for action of oscillating electric fields on cells. , 2000, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[13]  J. Schimmelpfeng,et al.  The action of 50 Hz magnetic and electric fields upon cell proliferation and cyclic AMP content of cultured mammalian cells , 1993 .

[14]  V R Singh,et al.  Role of natural frequency of bone as a guide for detection of bone fracture healing. , 1989, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[15]  K. Schoenbach,et al.  The effect of pulsed electric fields on biological cells: experiments and applications , 1997 .

[16]  T. Webster,et al.  Greater osteoblast proliferation on anodized nanotubular titanium upon electrical stimulation , 2008, International journal of nanomedicine.

[17]  Sandra Downes,et al.  Protein adsorption and human osteoblast-like cell attachment and growth on alkylthiol on gold self-assembled monolayers. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[18]  L. Bourguignon,et al.  Electric stimulation of protein and DNA synthesis in human fibroblasts , 1987, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[19]  W. Dai,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Nanopulse Penetration of Biological Matter Using the z-Transform , 2005, J. Math. Model. Algorithms.

[20]  A. Dubey,et al.  Characterization of hydroxyapatite-perovskite (CaTiO3) composites: phase evaluation and cellular response. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[21]  S. Hui,et al.  Response of C3H/10T1/2 fibroblasts to an external steady electric field stimulation. Reorientation, shape change, ConA receptor and intramembranous particle distribution and cytoskeleton reorganization. , 1984, Experimental cell research.

[22]  C. Schmidt,et al.  Electrical stimulation alters protein adsorption and nerve cell interactions with electrically conducting biomaterials. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[23]  R. Nuccitelli,et al.  Embryonic fibroblast motility and orientation can be influenced by physiological electric fields , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[24]  K. Schoenbach,et al.  Sub-microsecond, intense pulsed electric field applications to cells show specificity of effects. , 2003, Bioelectrochemistry.

[25]  Eiichi Fukada,et al.  On the Piezoelectric Effect of Bone , 1957 .

[26]  D. Deligianni,et al.  Effect of surface roughness of hydroxyapatite on human bone marrow cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation and detachment strength. , 2001, Biomaterials.