New approaches to generating comprehensive all-day activity-travel schedules

Activity-based travel demand models derive travel demand from people’s desire to pursue ac-tivities in time and space. They generate activity-travel schedules for individual travellers orhomogeneous groups of travellers. Comprehensive activity-travel schedules hold informationon which activities are performed, in which order, where and for how long, and which travelmodes are used between the activities including corresponding routes. This paper presentsPlanomatX, a new scheduling algorithm based on Tabu Search that generates comprehen-sively optimized all-day schedules. The paper furthermore presents a new concept of sched-ule recycling that significantly reduces simulation runtimes by re-using schedules of opti-mized travellers for other non-optimized travellers. Both PlanomatX and schedule recyclingare part of the agent-based microsimulation MATSim (Multi-Agent Transport Simulation,http://matsim.org). MATSim’s utility function has been adapted to cope with the enhancedfunctionality of PlanomatX and schedule recycling. First test results on the greater Zurich sce-nario with more than 170,000 agents show that PlanomatX achieves significantly better op-timization results than MATSim’s existing scheduling algorithms. However, it also leads todisproportional simulation runtimes. Schedule recycling relieves this drawback and allows forgenerating comprehensively optimized all-day schedules for large-scale scenarios at affordableruntimes.

[1]  Karthik K. Srinivasan,et al.  Analysis of within-household effects and between-household differences in maintenance activity allocation , 2005 .

[2]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  ACTIVITY-BASED TRAVEL FORECASTING , 1997 .

[3]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  WORK TRAVEL MODE CHOICE AND NUMBER OF NON-WORK COMMUTE STOPS , 1997 .

[4]  Satoshi Fujii,et al.  TWO COMPUTATIONAL PROCESS MODELS OF ACTIVITY-TRAVEL BEHAVIOR1 , 1997 .

[5]  W.W. Recker,et al.  A MODEL OF COMPLEX TRAVEL BEHAVIOR: PART I. THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENT , 1985 .

[6]  Hjp Harry Timmermans,et al.  A learning-based transportation oriented simulation system , 2004 .

[7]  Peter Vovsha,et al.  Microsimulation in Travel Demand Modeling: Lessons Learned from the New York Best Practice Model , 2002 .

[8]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  A GA-based household scheduler , 2005 .

[9]  S. Srinivasan,et al.  Modeling household interactions in daily in-home and out-of-home maintenance activity participation , 2005 .

[10]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Location Choice Modeling for Shopping and Leisure Activities with MATSim , 2010 .

[11]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Location choice modeling for shopping and leisure activities with MATSim , 2009 .

[12]  Talal M. Alkhamis,et al.  A comparison between simulated annealing, genetic algorithm and tabu search methods for the unconstrained quadratic Pseudo-Boolean function , 2000 .

[13]  Nicolas Lefebvre,et al.  Fast shortest path computation in time-dependent traffic networks , 2007 .

[14]  Frank S. Koppelman,et al.  Modeling household activity–travel interactions as parallel constrained choices , 2005 .

[15]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Modeling intra-household interactions and group decision-making , 2005 .

[16]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Agent-based simulation of travel demand: Structure and computational performance of MATSim-T , 2008 .

[17]  Ta Theo Arentze,et al.  Experiences with developing ALBATROSS: a learning-based transportation oriented simulation system , 1998 .

[18]  C H Chang-Hyeon Joh,et al.  Measuring and predicting adaptation in multidimensional activity-travel patterns , 2004 .

[19]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Comprehensive Econometric Microsimulator for Daily Activity-Travel Patterns , 2004 .

[20]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  PII: S0965-8564(99)00043-9 , 2000 .

[21]  R. Kitamura APPLICATIONS OF MODELS OF ACTIVITY BEHAVIOR FOR ACTIVITY BASED DEMAND FORECASTING , 1997 .

[22]  Frederick S. Hillier,et al.  Introduction of Operations Research , 1967 .

[23]  Toshiyuki Yamamoto,et al.  Florida activity mobility simulator - Overview and preliminary validation results , 2005 .

[24]  M. Meyer,et al.  Urban transportation planning , 1984 .

[25]  Harry Timmermans,et al.  Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis , 1997 .

[26]  K. Nagel,et al.  Generating complete all-day activity plans with genetic algorithms , 2005 .

[27]  Gunnar Flötteröd,et al.  Enhancing MATSim with capabilities of within-day re-planning , 2007, 2007 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference.

[28]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  COMPUTATIONAL PROCESS MODELING OF HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL DECISIONS USING A GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM , 2005 .

[29]  T. Gärling,et al.  Computational-Process Modelling of Household Travel Decisions Using a Geographical Information System , 1994 .

[30]  Konstadinos G. Goulias,et al.  Transportation Systems Planning : Methods and Applications , 2002 .

[31]  Rachid Saad,et al.  Solving Timetabling Problems by Hybridizing Genetic Algorithms and Tabu Search , 2006 .

[32]  Khandker Nurul Habib,et al.  Modelling daily activity program generation considering within-day and day-to-day dynamics in activity-travel behaviour , 2008 .

[33]  Marcel Rieser,et al.  Anwendung eines agentenbasierten Modells der Verkehrsnachfrage auf die Schweiz / Application of an agent-based model of travel demand to the case of car traffic in Switzerland , 2007 .

[34]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Eine ereignisorientierte Simulation von Aktivitätenketten zur Parkstandswahl , 1989 .

[35]  Chandra R. Bhat A model of post home-arrival activity participation behavior , 1998 .

[36]  Francesco Ciari,et al.  Anwendung eines agentenbasierten Modells der Verkehrsnachfrage auf die Schweiz; ; Strassenverkehrstechnik; , 2009 .

[37]  M. Bradley,et al.  A model for joint choice of daily activity pattern types of household members , 2005 .

[38]  Fred Glover,et al.  Tabu Search - Part II , 1989, INFORMS J. Comput..