Modelling collective opinion formation by means of active Brownian particles

Abstract:The concept of active Brownian particles is used to model a collective opinion formation process. It is assumed that individuals in community create a two-component communication field that influences the change of opinions of other persons and/or can induce their migration. The communication field is described by a reaction-diffusion equation, the opinion change of the individuals is given by a master equation, while the migration is described by a set of Langevin equations, coupled by the communication field. In the mean-field limit holding for fast communication we derive a critical population size, above which the community separates into a majority and a minority with opposite opinions. The existence of external support (e.g. from mass media) changes the ratio between minority and majority, until above a critical external support the supported subpopulation exists always as a majority. Spatial effects lead to two critical “social” temperatures, between which the community exists in a metastable state, thus fluctuations below a certain critical wave number may result in a spatial opinion separation. The range of metastability is particularly determined by a parameter characterizing the individual response to the communication field. In our discussion, we draw analogies to phase transitions in physical systems.

[1]  John K. Tomfohr,et al.  Lecture Notes on Physics , 1879, Nature.

[2]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[3]  Miss A.O. Penney.  (b) , 1974, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[4]  W. Weidlich,et al.  Concepts and Models of a Quantitative Sociology , 1983 .

[5]  F. Schweitzer.  A Stochastic Approach to Nucleation in Finite Systems , 1988 .

[6]  Thermodynamics of finite systems and the kinetics of first-order phase transitions , 1987 .

[7]  F. Schweitzer,et al.  Kinetics of Phase Transitions in Finite Systems — A Stochastic Approach , 1988 .

[8]  H. Lorenz.  Nonlinear Dynamical Economics and Chaotic Motion , 1989 .

[9]  Michael Sonis,et al.  Chaos and socio-spatial dynamics , 1990 .

[10]  B. Latané,et al.  From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. , 1990 .

[11]  S. Galam.  Social paradoxes of majority rule voting and renormalization group , 1990 .

[12]  S. Galam,et al.  Towards a theory of collective phenomena: Consensus and attitude changes in groups , 1991 .

[13]  Wolfgang Weidlich,et al.  Physics and social science — The approach of synergetics , 1991 .

[14]  Wolfgang Weidlich,et al.  Models of selforganization in complex systems : MOSES , 1991 .

[15]  B. Latané,et al.  Statistical mechanics of social impact. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[16]  Harvey Gould,et al.  Active‐Walker Models: Growth and form in Nonequilibrium Systems , 1993 .

[17]  Dirk Helbing.  Stochastic and Boltzmann-like models for behavioral changes, and their relation to game theory , 1993 .

[18]  Robin R. Vallacher,et al.  Dynamical Systems in Social Psychology , 1994 .

[19]  Didier Sornette,et al.  The Black-Scholes option pricing problem in mathematical finance : generalization and extensions for a large class of stochastic processes , 1994 .

[20]  Louise K. Comfort,et al.  Self-Organization in Complex Systems , 1994 .

[21]  Lutz Schimansky-Geier,et al.  Clustering of “active” walkers in a two-component system , 1994 .

[22]  Andrzej Nowak,et al.  Measuring emergent social phenomena: Dynamism, polarization, and clustering as order parameters of social systems , 1994 .

[23]  Lui Lam,et al.  Active walker models for complex systems , 1995 .

[24]  Lutz Schimansky-Geier,et al.  Structure formation by active Brownian particles , 1995 .

[25]  Günter Haag,et al.  How to control a chaotic economy? , 1996 .

[26]  K. Kacperski,et al.  Phase transitions and hysteresis in a cellular automata-based model of opinion formation , 1996 .

[27]  L. Amaral,et al.  Can statistical physics contribute to the science of economics , 1996 .

[28]  Günter Haag,et al.  Destructive role of competition and noise for control of microeconomical chaos , 1997 .

[29]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Active Walker Model for the Formation of Human and Animal Trail Systems , 1997 .

[30]  Frank Schweitzer,et al.  Self-Organization of Complex Structures: From Individual to Collective Dynamics - Some Introductory , 1997 .

[31]  S. Galam.  Rational group decision making: A random field Ising model at T = 0 , 1997, cond-mat/9702163.

[32]  F Schweitzer,et al.  Active random walkers simulate trunk trail formation by ants. , 1997, Bio Systems.

[33]  Frank Schweitzer,et al.  Active brownian particles: Artificial agents in physics , 1997 .

[34]  Frank Schweitzer.  Modelling Migration and Economic Agglomeration with Active Brownian Particles , 1998, Adv. Complex Syst..

[35]  Yicheng Zhang,et al.  On the minority game: Analytical and numerical studies , 1998, cond-mat/9805084.

[36]  Werner Ebeling,et al.  Complex Motion of Brownian Particles with Energy Depots , 1998 .

[37]  Dariusz Plewczynski,et al.  Landau theory of social clustering , 1998 .

[38]  D. Sornette,et al.  Stretched exponential distributions in nature and economy: “fat tails” with characteristic scales , 1998, cond-mat/9801293.

[39]  K. Kacperski,et al.  Opinion formation model with strong leader and external impact: a mean field approach , 1999 .

[40]  W. Ebeling,et al.  Active Brownian particles with energy depots modeling animal mobility. , 1999, Bio Systems.

[41]  Rosario N. Mantegna,et al.  Book Review: An Introduction to Econophysics, Correlations, and Complexity in Finance, N. Rosario, H. Mantegna, and H. E. Stanley, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. , 2000 .