Virtual performance assessment of 3D quantification systems

This work presents a system for realistic computer simulations of quantification systems from three-dimensional (3D) medical images. The system is based on accurate computer models of anatomical parts derived from 3D medical images. The models can be realistically manipulated in the virtual domain reflecting actual scan-rescan situations. The manipulated object can be used to reconstruct 3D images. Furthermore, the model can be used to simulate observer segmentations of the reconstructed anatomy. Because segmentations are fundamental for comprehensive quantification of anatomical structures quantifications performances can be derived from the simulated segmentations. The proposed simulation system has been used to predict joint space width variations between two different imaging protocols without the need of analyzing several volunteers' scans. The system has been used to predict intra observer performance helping in the selection of the best imaging protocol. Performance results and comparison with actual scan rescan performance evaluations are presented.

[1]  F Eckstein,et al.  Repeatability of patellar cartilage thickness patterns in the living, using a fat‐suppressed magnetic resonance imaging sequence with short acquisition time and three‐dimensinal data processing , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[2]  Heiko Graichen,et al.  Quantitative cartilage imaging of the human hind foot: Precision and inter‐subject variability , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[3]  Lydia Ng,et al.  Quantitative image analysis: software systems in drug development trials. , 2003, Drug discovery today.

[4]  Hideki Yoshikawa,et al.  Limits on the accuracy of 3-D thickness measurement in magnetic resonance images-effects of voxel anisotropy , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Kevin J. Parker,et al.  Segmentation, surface extraction, and thickness computation of articular cartilage , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[6]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  Comparison and reproducibility of fast and conventional spoiled gradient‐echo magnetic resonance sequences in the determination of knee cartilage volume , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[7]  Monica Barbu-McInnis,et al.  Knee cartilage extraction and bone-cartilage interface analysis from 3D MRI data sets , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[8]  Owen D Williamson,et al.  Determining the sample size in a clinical trial , 2003, The Medical journal of Australia.

[9]  Maximilian Reiser,et al.  Femoro‐tibial cartilage metrics from coronal MR image data: Technique, test–retest reproducibility, and findings in osteoarthritis , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Amy L. Lerner,et al.  Evaluation of distance maps from fast GRE MRI as a tool to study the knee joint space , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[11]  Chris A McGibbon,et al.  Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of subchondral bone and cartilage thickness measurement from MRI. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[12]  Claude Kauffmann,et al.  Computer-aided method for quantification of cartilage thickness and volume changes using MRI: validation study using a synthetic model , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  K.J. Parker,et al.  The integration of automatic segmentation and motion tracking for 4D reconstruction and visualization of musculoskeletal structures , 1998, Proceedings. Workshop on Biomedical Image Analysis (Cat. No.98EX162).

[14]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Quantitative image analysis: software systems in drug development trials. , 2003, Drug discovery today.