Evaluating the productivity and costs of five energywood harvesting operations in the lower Mid-Atlantic region of the U.S

ABSTRACT Woody biomass is an important feedstock for renewable energy production in the United States. Residues are produced by forest harvests, and some operations utilize this material for energywood. Energywood requires additional processing and is often the lowest value product generated. Additional research quantifying the productivity and costs of energywood operations could allow stakeholders to evaluate the efficiency of those operations and identify areas for improvement. This study evaluated five energywood harvesting operations in the Lower Mid-Atlantic region of the United States (two Appalachian Mountain harvests and three Coastal Plain harvests). Each harvesting operation was observed for 4–7 days, and productivity data were collected on each harvesting function using time study and activity sampling methods. Productivity and costs of each operation were estimated, and equipment mixes and harvesting methods were evaluated to determine efficiency. Interviews were also conducted with each logging contractor to understand operating strategies and decision making. Cut and haul costs averaged (USD) $32.07/tonne and ranged from $26.19 to $38.28/tonne. Hauling consistently comprised the largest function cost at an average of $12.24/tonne. Machines handling energywood were less productive than those harvesting roundwood because of the large effect average stem size had on productivity levels. Harvesting system analysis also highlighted the importance of ensuring a balanced equipment mix to lower costs and ensure efficiency. This research provides stakeholders with a valuable comparison of energywood harvesting operations in the Lower Mid-Atlantic region of the United States that can be used to make better-informed decisions regarding the efficient and economical harvest of energywood.

[1]  Dominik Röser,et al.  Recovering Energy Biomass in Conventional Forest Operations: a Review of Integrated Harvesting Systems , 2019, Current Forestry Reports.

[2]  Elizabeth M. Dodson,et al.  Harvesting forest biomass in the US southern Rocky Mountains: cost and production rates of five ground-based forest operations , 2019, International Journal of Forest Engineering.

[3]  Joseph L. Conrad, IV.  Costs and Challenges of Log Truck Transportation in Georgia, USA , 2018, Forests.

[4]  Conrad,et al.  Costs and Challenges of Log Truck Transportation in Georgia, USA , 2018 .

[5]  J. R. Saucier,et al.  Total-Tree Weight, Stem Weight, and Volume Tables for Hardwood Species in the Southeast , 2018 .

[6]  J. Munsell,et al.  Characteristics of Logging Businesses across Virginia’s Diverse Physiographic Regions , 2017 .

[7]  Mark Brown,et al.  An international review of the most productive and cost effective forest biomass recovery technologies and supply chains , 2017 .

[8]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  2016 Billion-Ton Report: Advancing Domestic Resources for a Thriving Bioeconomy , 2016 .

[9]  Scott M. Barrett,et al.  Productivity and costs of utilizing small-diameter stems in a biomass-only harvest , 2016 .

[10]  D. Murray,et al.  An Analysis of the Operational Costs of Trucking: 2017 Update , 2014 .

[11]  Scott M. Barrett,et al.  Characteristics of Logging Businesses that Harvest Biomass for Energy Production , 2014 .

[12]  Timothy P. McDonald,et al.  Implementing residue chippers on harvesting operations in the southeastern US for biomass recovery , 2013 .

[13]  W. Michael Aust,et al.  Harvesting productivity and costs when utilizing energywood from pine plantations of the southern Coastal Plain USA , 2013 .

[14]  Han-Sup Han,et al.  Productivity and Cost of Integrated Harvesting of Wood Chips and Sawlogs in Stand Conversion Operations , 2012 .

[15]  W. Dale Greene,et al.  Productivity and Product Quality Measures for Chippers and Grinders on Operational Southern US Timber Harvests , 2011 .

[16]  Francisco X. Aguilar,et al.  Perspectives of Woody Biomass for Energy: Survey of State Foresters, State Energy Biomass Contacts, and National Council of Forestry Association Executives , 2009 .

[17]  W. D. Greene,et al.  Utilizing forest biomass by adding a small chipper to a tree-length southern pine harvesting operation. , 2007 .

[18]  John Sessions,et al.  Machine Rate Estimates and Equipment Utilization , 2021 .

[19]  J. Laitila.  Performance of a small and a medium sized professional chippers and the impact of storage time on Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) stem wood chips characteristics , 2015 .

[20]  Loren D. Kellogg,et al.  Productivity and costs of an integrated mechanical forest fuel reduction operation in southwest Oregon , 2009 .

[21]  B. L. Lanford,et al.  Wildfire fuel harvesting and resultant biomass utilization using a cut-to-length/small chipper system , 2005 .

[22]  Ray A. Newbold,et al.  Benchmark roundwood delivery cycle-times and potential efficiency gains in the southern United States , 2003 .

[23]  R. W. Brinker,et al.  Machine Rates for Selected Forest Harvesting Machines , 2002 .

[24]  Edwin S. Miyata,et al.  Determining fixed and operating costs of logging equipment. , 1980 .