Incubation of cultured skin substitutes in reduced humidity promotes cornification in vitro and stable engraftment in athymic mice

Cultured skin substitutes have been used successfully for adjunctive treatment of excised burns and chronic skin wounds. However, limitations inherent to all models of cultured skin include deficient barrier function in vitro, and delayed keratinization after grafting in comparison to native skin autografts. Experimental conditions for incubation of skin substitutes were tested to stimulate barrier development before grafting, and measure responses in function and stability after grafting. Cultured skin substitutes consisted of human keratinocytes and fibroblasts attached to collagen‐glycosaminoglycan biopolymer substrates. Parallel cultured skin substitutes were incubated at the air–liquid interface in ambient (48–61%) or saturated (79–91%) relative humidity, and grafted to athymic mice on culture day 14. Additional cultured skin substitutes were incubated in the experimental conditions for a total of 28 days. Cadaveric human skin and acellular biopolymer substrates served as controls. Epidermal barrier was evaluated as the change in surface hydration by surface electrical capacitance with the NOVA™ Dermal Phase Meter. Cultured skin substitutes and cadaveric skin incubated in ambient humidity had lower baseline surface electrical capacitance and less change in surface electrical capacitance than parallel samples incubated in saturated humidity at all time points in vitro. Data from healing cultured skin substitutes at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after grafting showed an earlier return to hydration levels comparable to native human skin, and more stable engraftment for skin substitutes from ambient humidity. The data indicate that cultured skin substitutes in ambient humidity have lower surface electrical capacitance and greater stability in vitro, and that they reform epidermal barrier more rapidly after grafting than cultured skin substitutes in saturated humidity. These results suggest that restoration of functional epidermis by cultured skin substitutes is stimulated by incubation in reduced humidity in vitro.

[1]  P. Elias,et al.  Exposure to a dry environment enhances epidermal permeability barrier function. , 1998, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[2]  S. Boyce,et al.  Regulation of pigmentation in cultured skin substitutes by cytometric sorting of melanocytes and keratinocytes. , 1997, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[3]  S. Boyce,et al.  Glutaraldehyde crosslinking of collagen substrates inhibits degradation in skin substitutes grafted to athymic mice. , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[4]  S. Boyce,et al.  Surface electrical capacitance as a noninvasive index of epidermal barrier in cultured skin substitutes in athymic mice. , 1996, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[5]  D. Greenhalgh,et al.  Comparative Assessment of Cultured Skin Substitutes and Native Skin Autograft for Treatment of Full‐Thickness Burns , 1995, Annals of surgery.

[6]  D. Greenhalgh,et al.  Surface electrical capacitance as an index of epidermal barrier properties of composite skin substitutes and skin autografts , 1995, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[7]  S. Hoath,et al.  Surface electrical capacitance as a noninvasive bedside measure of epidermal barrier maturation in the newborn infant. , 1995, Pediatrics.

[8]  S. Hoath,et al.  Effect of Prenatal Steroids on Skin Surface Hydrophobicity in the Premature Rat , 1995, Pediatric Research.

[9]  O. Ringdén,et al.  Ten years' experience of bone marrow transplantation for Gaucher disease. , 1995, Transplantation.

[10]  D. Greenhalgh,et al.  Pigmentation and microanatomy of skin regenerated from composite grafts of cultured cells and biopolymers applied to full-thickness burn wounds. , 1995, Transplantation.

[11]  D. Greenhalgh,et al.  Topical nutrients promote engraftment and inhibit wound contraction of cultured skin substitutes in athymic mice. , 1995, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[12]  D. M. Cooper,et al.  Definitions and guidelines for assessment of wounds and evaluation of healing , 1994, Archives of dermatology.

[13]  Philip L. Kelton,et al.  Physiology, Biochemistry, and Molecular Biology of the Skin , 1993 .

[14]  S. Boyce,et al.  Lipid supplemented medium induces lamellar bodies and precursors of barrier lipids in cultured analogues of human skin. , 1993, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[15]  J. Alexander,et al.  Histological, biochemical, and ultrastructural studies on hyperpigmented human skin xenografts. , 1993, Pigment cell research.

[16]  S. Boyce,et al.  Pigmentation and inhibition of wound contraction by cultured skin substitutes with adult melanocytes after transplantation to athymic mice. , 1993, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[17]  D. Greenhalgh,et al.  Skin anatomy and antigen expression after burn wound closure with composite grafts of cultured skin cells and biopolymers. , 1993, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[18]  A. Lerner,et al.  Physiology, Biochemistry, and Molecular Biology of the Skin , 1993 .

[19]  M. D. Harriger,et al.  Cornification and basement membrane formation in a bilayered human skin equivalent maintained at an air-liquid interface. , 1992, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[20]  S. Sakabu,et al.  Skin wound closure in athymic mice with cultured human cells, biopolymers, and growth factors. , 1991, Surgery.

[21]  R. Guy,et al.  Barrier function of human keratinocyte cultures grown at the air-liquid interface. , 1991, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[22]  T. Agner,et al.  Guidelines for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement , 1990, Contact dermatitis.

[23]  S. Boyce,et al.  Burn wound closure with cultured autologous keratinocytes and fibroblasts attached to a collagen-glycosaminoglycan substrate. , 1989, JAMA.

[24]  S. Boyce,et al.  Biologic attachment, growth, and differentiation of cultured human epidermal keratinocytes on a graftable collagen and chondroitin-6-sulfate substrate. , 1988, Surgery.

[25]  M. Prunieras,et al.  Wound healing of human skin transplanted on to the nude mouse , 1985, The British journal of dermatology.

[26]  D. Woodley,et al.  Methods for cultivation of keratinocytes with an air-liquid interface. , 1983, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[27]  H. Maibach,et al.  Transepidermal water loss as a function of skin surface temperature. , 1981, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[28]  H. Tagami,et al.  Evaluation of the skin surface hydration in vivo by electrical measurement. , 1980, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[29]  M. Sharratt,et al.  Skin temperature and transepidermal water loss. , 1971, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[30]  S. Hoath,et al.  Use of continuous electrical capacitance and transepidermal water loss measurements for assessing barrier function in neonatal rat skin. , 1995, Skin pharmacology : the official journal of the Skin Pharmacology Society.

[31]  S. Hoath,et al.  Human Newborn Skin: The Effect of Isopropanol on Skin Surface Hydrophobicity , 1994, Pediatric Research.

[32]  M. Prunieras,et al.  Wound healing of human skin transplanted onto the nude mouse. I. An immunohistological study of the reepithelialization process. , 1986, Developmental biology.

[33]  P. Elias,et al.  Epidermal lipids, barrier function, and desquamation. , 1983, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[34]  A. Kligman,et al.  CHAPTER XX – The Biology of the Stratum Corneum , 1964 .