A contrast effect between the concurrent production and perception of movement directions

With three experiments, we explored the nature of specific interference between the concurrent production and perception of movements. Participants were asked to move one of their hands in a certain direction while simultaneously trying to identify the direction of an independent and non-biological stimulus motion. Perceived direction of the stimulus was assessed with either above/below judgements (Experiment 1), same/different judgements (Experiment 2), or the adjustment of a line (Experiment 3). The results revealed a form of contrast effect: Perceived directions were repulsed by produced directions. Moreover, the size of the effect was comparable across the three experiments, which points to its robustness and allowed us to control for potential confounds associated with some of the perceptual measures. These results alleviate concerns regarding the interpretation of related findings and demonstrate that effects of this type are not tied to the processing of biological motion, as previously proposed.

[1]  W. Prinz.  A common-coding approach to perception and action , 1990 .

[2]  Y. Paulignan,et al.  An Interference Effect of Observed Biological Movement on Action , 2003, Current Biology.

[3]  Uta Frith,et al.  Your Own Action Influences How You Perceive Another Person's Action , 2004, Current Biology.

[4]  Claire F. Michaels,et al.  An ecological approach to stimulus-response compatibility , 1997 .

[5]  K. Doya,et al.  A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[6]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Space and selective attention , 1994 .

[7]  Romeo Chua,et al.  Dynamical explorations of compatibility in perception-action coupling , 1997 .

[8]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility: Editors' introduction , 1997 .

[9]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Perceiving while acting: action affects perception , 2004, Psychological research.

[10]  Robert L. Mason,et al.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 2003 .

[11]  Jeff Miller,et al.  A computer program for Spearman-Kärber and probit analysis of psychometric function data , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[12]  Gerald Westhhmer,et al.  Simultaneous orientation contrast for lines in the human fovea , 1990, Vision Research.

[13]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Threshold estimation in two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) tasks: The Spearman-Kärber method , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  W. Prinz.  Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[15]  de Ritske Jong,et al.  Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility , 1997 .

[16]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Stimulus-Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective , 1990 .

[17]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Effects of voluntary movements on early auditory brain responses , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  G Westheimer,et al.  Simultaneous orientation contrast for lines in the human fovea. , 1990, Vision research.

[19]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  Interactions between perception and action in a reaction task with overlapping S-R assignments , 2001, Psychological research.

[20]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective Reaching to Grasp: Evidence for Distractor Interference Effects , 1997 .

[21]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Mutual repulsion between moving visual targets. , 1979, Science.

[22]  Pierre Jolicœur,et al.  Dual-task interference and visual encoding , 1999 .

[23]  G. Chapman,et al.  Contrast Effects in Judgments of Health Hazards , 2003, The Journal of social psychology.

[24]  P. Viviani,et al.  Biological movements look uniform: evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  A. Wohlschläger,et al.  Visual motion priming by invisible actions , 2000, Vision Research.

[26]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Revisiting motion repulsion: evidence for a general phenomenon? , 1999, Vision Research.

[27]  V. Dilollo.  CONTRAST EFFECTS IN THE JUDGMENT OF LIFTED WEIGHTS. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Where does your own action influence your perception of another person's action in the brain? , 2006, NeuroImage.

[29]  Jeff Miller,et al.  On the analysis of psychometric functions: The Spearman-Kärber method , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  J. Danckert.  Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance XIX Wolfgang Prinz, Bernhard Hommel (Eds.), Oxford University Press, 2002, Price: £ 65.00, ISBN: 0-19-851069 , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Action influences spatial perception: Neuropsychological evidence , 2004 .

[32]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.

[33]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Attention and Performance 15: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing , 1994 .

[34]  D. W. Joyce,et al.  Kinematic cues in perceptual weight judgement and their origins in box lifting , 2007, Psychological research.

[35]  R. D. de Jong,et al.  Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Maggie Shiffrar,et al.  Walking perception by walking observers. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  B. Hommel,et al.  Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  Jochen Müsseler,et al.  How independent from action control is perception? An event-coding account for more equally ranked crosstalks , 1999 .

[39]  H. Heuer,et al.  The modulation of intermanual interactions during the specification of the directions of bimanual movements , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[41]  Natalia Dounskaia,et al.  Constraints during bimanual coordination: the role of direction in relation to amplitude and force requirements , 2001, Behavioural Brain Research.

[42]  T. Bachmann,et al.  Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (Advances in Psychology, Vol. 129) , 1999 .

[43]  H. Pashler.  Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[44]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  Can blindness to response-compatible stimuli be observed in the absence of a response? , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  R. Ward.  Independence and integration of perception and action: An introduction , 2002 .

[46]  D Kerzel,et al.  Visual short-term memory is influenced by haptic perception. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[47]  Robert Patterson,et al.  Direction-selective adaptation and simultaneous contrast induced by stereoscopic (cyclopean) motion , 1996, Vision Research.